Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Yeager’s NF-104 Supersonic Spin >

Yeager’s NF-104 Supersonic Spin

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Yeager’s NF-104 Supersonic Spin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2019, 04:48 AM
  #1  
Moderate Moderator
Thread Starter
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Yeager’s NF-104 Supersonic Spin

USAF recently released ground footage of Yeager on his ill-fated NF-104 flight, dramatized in “The Right Stuff.”

While grainy with film quality of the era...impressive as hell. The suddenness of the initial yaw angles is amazing.

You can see an anti-spin drag chute towards the end (to me, it looks like he recovered, but was too low for the dive pullout), and the ejection, too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...rc4VrLSahdocUg
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 12-12-2019, 05:25 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 62
Default

This video is gold. Too bad it’s not accompanied with the audio. In test pilot George Marrett’s book “Contrails over the Mojave” he puts the blame for the accident squarely on Yeager for not following certain procedures. Of course I’m not 2% the pilot Yeager was/is, so I’m not judging. Amazing video. Interestingly, as has happened in other accidents, as soon as the seat left the aircraft, the jet stabilized on its own, probably from both change in CG and/or change in airflow due to now missing canopy.
Tandem46 is offline  
Old 12-12-2019, 05:48 AM
  #3  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,223
Default

Also consider that aerodynamic controls were insufficient for normal attitude control at altitude. Spacecraft attitude thrusters were used for at least yaw, you can see them on the nose during the preflight. Using those to control an F-104 has got to be a special kind of special.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-12-2019, 06:05 AM
  #4  
Moderate Moderator
Thread Starter
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Also consider that aerodynamic controls were insufficient for normal attitude control at altitude. Spacecraft attitude thrusters were used for at least yaw, you can see them on the nose during the preflight. Using those to control an F-104 has got to be a special kind of special.
In the video, they show the peroxide reaction ports during the preflight for roll AND yaw. I am assuming there were some for pitch as well. It shows the secondary stick for the thrusters...that had to be an unusual hand-eye-stick coordination drill...

An X-15 was lost in a spin in a similar incident (1967; Pilot Michael Adams, killed) at Mach 5; g-forces exceeded 15 vertical and 8 lateral, and it broke up.

It said either in the video, or the text below it, that the J79 was shut down prior to the zoom. I know this had to be done above about 65,000 with that engine; it was done so in the F-4 for record climbs. Accident report blamed it partially on gyroscopic precession during the rolldown. Seems questionable.

But it does appear he was recovered from the spin, and likely did not yet have an airstart...and possibly not enough windmilling rpm for flight controls to pull out of the dive.

Addendum: someone with more knowledge stated the spin WAS stopped, but the engine was down to 6%...not enough for an airstart in limited time.

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 12-12-2019 at 06:28 AM.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 06:58 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
klondike's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: in a Big Box that moves back,forth, up, down and makes cool sounds
Posts: 352
Default

I am not smart enough or knowledgeable enough or credible enough to come on here and formulate my own opinion on this accident- especially since I was never a test pilot and I was only 10 months old on the day of this accident.

That said, Frank Borman wrote his memoirs in a book called “Countdown.”

In that book he addressed this accident. He was very blunt and pulled no punches. I’m paraphrasing but, essentially, Borman’s take was that the flight was an unnecessary stunt(his word) that contributed nothing to research and/or development and was nothing more than an attempt to set another record. According to Borman, Yeager had not completed the full Aerospace Research Pilot School curriculum necessary to fly the NF-104 to its design envelope limits. In essence, his ego wrote a check that his body very nearly couldn’t cash. The feeling amongst the rank and file was that, because he was the C.O. Of ARPS, he could do whatever he wanted.
Borman’s final words on the subject were that Yeager’s actions destroyed a very valuable research tool.

To make matters worse, after the accident, top USAF brass figured (incorrectly, as it turned it) that if the airplane had nearly killed the “immortal Yeager”, it MUST be inherently dangerous and unsafe- so they grounded it for some time.
The post- Accident investigation showed that, among other mistakes, Yeager flew a completely incorrect zoom-climb profile.

The NF-104 was developed specifically for ARPS and without it, the school had no airborne platform for future USAF pilot/astronauts to develop space vehicle techniques.

Last edited by klondike; 01-01-2020 at 07:22 AM.
klondike is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 08:41 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 739
Default

Originally Posted by klondike View Post
I am not smart enough or knowledgeable enough or credible enough to come on here and formulate my own opinion on this accident- especially since I was never a test pilot and I was only 10 months old on the day of this accident.

That said, Frank Borman wrote his memoirs in a book called “Countdown.”

In that book he addressed this accident. He was very blunt and pulled no punches. I’m paraphrasing but, essentially, Borman’s take was that the flight was an unnecessary stunt(his word) that contributed nothing to research and/or development and was nothing more than an attempt to set another record. According to Borman, Yeager had not completed the full Aerospace Research Pilot School curriculum necessary to fly the NF-104 to its design envelope limits. In essence, his ego wrote a check that his body very nearly couldn’t cash. The feeling amongst the rank and file was that, because he was the C.O. Of ARPS, he could do whatever he wanted.
Borman’s final words on the subject were that Yeager’s actions destroyed a very valuable research tool.

To make matters worse, after the accident, top USAF brass figured (incorrectly, as it turned it) that if the airplane had nearly killed the “immortal Yeager”, it MUST be inherently dangerous and unsafe- so they grounded it for some time.
The post- Accident investigation showed that, among other mistakes, Yeager flew a completely incorrect zoom-climb profile.

The NF-104 was developed specifically for ARPS and without it, the school had no airborne platform for future USAF pilot/astronauts to develop space vehicle techniques.
You do realize that you will be burned at the stake for violating this area of Political Correctness.
MaxQ is offline  
Old 01-02-2020, 09:04 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
klondike's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: in a Big Box that moves back,forth, up, down and makes cool sounds
Posts: 352
Default

Originally Posted by klondike View Post
I am not smart enough or knowledgeable enough or credible enough to come on here and formulate my own opinion on this accident- especially since I was never a test pilot and I was only 10 months old on the day of this accident.

That said, Frank Borman wrote his memoirs in a book called “Countdown.”

In that book he addressed this accident. He was very blunt and pulled no punches. I’m paraphrasing but, essentially, Borman’s take was that the flight was an unnecessary stunt(his word) that contributed nothing to research and/or development and was nothing more than an attempt to set another record. According to Borman, Yeager had not completed the full Aerospace Research Pilot School curriculum necessary to fly the NF-104 to its design envelope limits. In essence, his ego wrote a check that his body very nearly couldn’t cash. The feeling amongst the rank and file was that, because he was the C.O. Of ARPS, he could do whatever he wanted.
Borman’s final words on the subject were that Yeager’s actions destroyed a very valuable research tool.

To make matters worse, after the accident, top USAF brass figured (incorrectly, as it turned it) that if the airplane had nearly killed the “immortal Yeager”, it MUST be inherently dangerous and unsafe- so they grounded it for some time.
The post- Accident investigation showed that, among other mistakes, Yeager flew a completely incorrect zoom-climb profile.

The NF-104 was developed specifically for ARPS and without it, the school had no airborne platform for future USAF pilot/astronauts to develop space vehicle techniques.
Originally Posted by MaxQ View Post
You do realize that you will be burned at the stake for violating this area of Political Correctness.
😊
Yes Sir. I know. But like I said, what I wrote was what Borman went on record as stating. According to other readings on the subject, many other highly respected and well-educated professional test pilots of the era felt the same way about it.
klondike is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
MartinBishop
Aviation Technology
8
06-13-2016 09:50 AM
R Banger
Flight Schools and Training
14
11-15-2011 06:28 PM
Jones14
Flight Schools and Training
14
02-19-2010 04:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices