Many being indirectly saved by the CVIrus...
According to this info, China has seen more people saved by the CVirus, than the number of deaths worldwide. There have also been a drastic reduction in traffic deaths in China indirectly because of the CVirus.
The two months of pollution reduction, Burke calculates, has probably saved the lives of 4,000 children under 5 and 73,000 adults over 70 in China. That's significantly more than the current global death toll from the virus itself. Here is the blog post with the data details... https://www.360dx.com/pcr/coronaviru...D#.XnR582hKhPY |
Yup, C-19 is actually a good thing.
SMH |
If we destroyed our economies and devolved them to a Medieval level there would be no traffic deaths (save the occasional oxcart) or pollution deaths (save the occasional second-hand smoke from witch-burning.)
Let's go for it. |
New Chinese green deal?
|
This is probably the dumbest troll post I've ever read.
Congrats! |
Originally Posted by AgentSmith
(Post 3007597)
This is probably the dumbest troll post I've ever read.
Congrats! If anything is a troll - it is the article. Just for a fun hypothetical exercise to pass the time - which part of the statistics behind the article do you disagree with and where is your research to write a counter-article? |
At least, someone understands the concept of trade-offs. World-wide pandemic collapsing the economy is balanced by some pollution reduction.
|
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 3007615)
At least, someone understands the concept of trade-offs. World-wide pandemic collapsing the economy is balanced by some pollution reduction.
I’m certainly not smart enough to think of them, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the trickledown effects are going be harder to deal with the virus itself in the end game. |
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
(Post 3007609)
Citing articles isn't trolling - at least the post nor the poster.
If anything is a troll - it is the article. Just for a fun hypothetical exercise to pass the time - which part of the statistics behind the article do you disagree with and where is your research to write a counter-article? It's still stupid. It's still a troll. You should feel stupid for trying to legitimize it. |
Originally Posted by AgentSmith
(Post 3007707)
You already read it.
It's still stupid. It's still a troll. You should feel stupid for trying to legitimize it. Good counterpoint! |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:19 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands