Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Unluckiest Generation >

Unluckiest Generation

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Unluckiest Generation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2020, 07:35 AM
  #421  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,809
Default

Originally Posted by NE_Pilot View Post
I am using the term society in response to your usage of it. Civilization may be more appropriate?

You can’t have a division of labor, and therefore agricultural society, without some recognition of property rights. Division of labor requires trade, and trade requires a recognition of property rights. Groups that recognized this survived and thrived, while groups that did not died off.

Lastly, from a prior statement by you:




Did hunter-gatherers recognize rights or not? These two statements appear to contradict each other.
Sorry for the confusion. They had property rights within the tribe. It helped hold the tribe together. Anything outside the tribe was fair game. If someone was taken captive by another tribe or their possessions were stolen they didn't have an idea of an over-arching "human right" not to be captured. They had no recourse in that event anyway.
GogglesPisano is online now  
Old 08-03-2020, 07:52 AM
  #422  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido View Post
Why do I get the feeling you're the kind of guy who rigs his own ballyhoo?



^^^^ Key plot line of this thread. I'll agree it goes way back. So far back as, bite marks on this apple here don't look like birds done it. Any ideas you two? Universal right anything and everything but that one thing. Choices can be a real pi$$er.

Dominion over behavior is what sets us apart from beast and creates a basis for species survival. The U.S. Constitution is one country's framework for getting that done, on record, under terms of impartiality. Also namesake of the world's oldest commissioned frigate still afloat. Blasting deeper fault lines in the common ground that's served us so well only makes the job of confronting this crisis and the ones in trail, harder. Keep Old Ironsides shipshape you wonky AI master & commanders of tomorrow. She ain't lost yet.
I agree. Essentially all rights derive from property rights. The ultimate property you own is yourself. Groups that discovered and recognized property rights to some extent thrived, as opposed to groups that did not, this allowed society, civilization, or whatever you want to call it, to emerge. These groups passed down the recognition of property rights either as values and traditions or later codified as laws. These all are simply recognition of property rights.

In some sense property rights can be seen as an evolutionary trait. It emerges through people interacting with each other, those who succeeded recognized property rights. Maybe rights is not a great term, maybe something like natural law is better? Either way, property rights were not something decided from a human authority, but rather a natural emergence from human interaction.

If you look at the Bill of Rights, they all essentially deal with property rights. However, many “rights” today are not really rights and are simply constructs of “society”, and many actually work to deny property rights.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Old 08-03-2020, 08:01 AM
  #423  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
Sorry for the confusion. They had property rights within the tribe. It helped hold the tribe together. Anything outside the tribe was fair game. If someone was taken captive by another tribe or their possessions were stolen they didn't have an idea of an over-arching "human right" not to be captured. They had no recourse in that event anyway.
Ok, I think I see what you are saying now. I would say that those groups that recognized the property rights of other groups were more successful than those that saw everyone else as fair game. It would only be a matter of time until the fighting your group engaged in would wither your group away. Groups that engaged in trade advanced more quickly than those that did not, trade predates the agricultural revolution, and a necessary prerequisite to trade is a recognition of another groups property rights.

It does not need to be an explicit recognition of rights” I may recognize that my group is equal or at a disadvantage to the other group and decide that trade is better for our group’s safety, it can be an implicit recognition. Just like I do not need an explicit understanding of kinetic and potential energy to build and use a bow and arrow.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hurricane757
American
11
02-18-2014 12:59 PM
dino1pilot
Regional
104
08-24-2012 12:41 PM
gtechpilot
Regional
1
03-21-2012 06:18 AM
DYNASTY HVY
Hangar Talk
34
03-11-2009 03:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices