Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Just got reported to the FAA >

Just got reported to the FAA

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Just got reported to the FAA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2020, 04:59 AM
  #11  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot View Post
Uh, no. I really doubt that would happen.
How about we make a bet?
For....let’s say....your certificate?
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 06-28-2020, 05:19 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
How about we make a bet?
For....let’s say....your certificate?
Dude, did you even watch the video? The FAA ASI even told the Premier pilot that it was stupid and they weren’t following up any further.

I’ve done rides with 135 FAA POIs, and countless 121 checkrides. No, I do not think anyone is going to bust you on a checkride for saying you are clear of the runway as you are literally exiting the runway. At worst, it would be a debrief item.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 06-28-2020, 08:23 AM
  #13  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Taxi clear of the runway unless otherwise directed by ATC. An aircraft is considered clear of the runway when all parts of the aircraft are past the runway edge and there are no restrictions to its continued movement beyond the runway holding position markings. In the absence of ATC instructions, the pilot is expected to taxi clear of the landing runway by taxiing beyond the runway holding position markings associated with the landing runway, even if that requires the aircraft to protrude into or cross another taxiway or ramp area. Once all parts of the aircraft have crossed the runway holding position markings, the pilot must hold unless further instructions have been issued by ATC.

............

TiredSoul is offline  
Old 06-28-2020, 08:55 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post

............

Are you the guy that reported him?

Based only on his momentum and the takeoff roll of the Bonanza and his position he was clear before the Bonanza even got to full throttle. No harm, no foul.
pangolin is offline  
Old 06-28-2020, 10:42 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,075
Default

Oh, for Heaven's sake.

Hetman is offline  
Old 06-28-2020, 02:32 PM
  #16  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying View Post
I believe ATC can only do this on a forward high speed (not sure though I'm not on that side of the radio)

while I would not rat a guy out to the FAA for something like that(not by a longshot), the guy filming this was wrong as far as FAR/AIM is concerned.

moral of the story, don't post a video of you flying online unless you are willing to have every facet dissected by everyone out there.

There's no regulatory allowance for pilots to do it, but it's not unreasonable. An utterly irrelevant technical violation is not necessarily an actual violation of the law, and that is established legal precedent: De Minimis

He'll get nothing worse than compliance philosophy anyway. I have no problem with him standing up to this, it's BS and waste of taxpayer dollars.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-29-2020, 07:59 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot View Post
Dude, did you even watch the video? The FAA ASI even told the Premier pilot that it was stupid and they weren’t following up any further.

I’ve done rides with 135 FAA POIs, and countless 121 checkrides. No, I do not think anyone is going to bust you on a checkride for saying you are clear of the runway as you are literally exiting the runway. At worst, it would be a debrief item.
I wouldn’t bet my certificate on it. The FAA isn’t standard at all in individual POIs interpretation/enforcement of the rules. Talk to 5 different POIs, get 5 different answers. And some of them have little to no experience in the operation they are over-seeing, which has little bearing on this situation.
EMAW is offline  
Old 06-29-2020, 08:13 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 459
Default

That’s a really long winded video for saying, “I was incorrect, and it’s lame that someone reported me for it.”
hydrostream is offline  
Old 06-29-2020, 08:19 AM
  #19  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Originally Posted by hydrostream View Post
That’s a really long winded video for saying, “I was incorrect, and it’s lame that someone reported me for it.”
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 06-29-2020, 09:04 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,979
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
There's no regulatory allowance for pilots to do it, but it's not unreasonable. An utterly irrelevant technical violation is not necessarily an actual violation of the law, and that is established legal precedent: De Minimis

He'll get nothing worse than compliance philosophy anyway. I have no problem with him standing up to this, it's BS and waste of taxpayer dollars.
I don't see any regulation that was violated. If the action endangered someone else (would have to prove that part and it's a high standard) then 91.13 could be invoked for not following the AIM, but again, there'd have to be some kind of near-miss, accident or other egregious situation associated. A stand-alone 91.13 violation has a very high burden of proof standard. 91.13 is often thrown in to other regulatory violations when they happen, as a result of those violations, but stand-alone is a very different matter.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bilsch
Aviation Law
1
03-16-2017 03:22 AM
vagabond
Safety
1
02-16-2011 02:25 PM
USMC3197
Regional
66
11-12-2009 06:54 PM
corl737
Major
7
09-04-2009 05:41 PM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices