Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Airbus:Autonomous Taxi, Take-Off and Landing >

Airbus:Autonomous Taxi, Take-Off and Landing

Search
Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Airbus:Autonomous Taxi, Take-Off and Landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2020, 06:58 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 360
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast View Post
The automation won't have to be perfect. Just better than human.It will get there. The incidents and accidents that do happen will get a lot of attention. But when the public finally realizes that while it is imperfect, it's still better, full automation will take off everywhere.



It took the feds YEARS just to certify an ipad, and more years to ditch all paper. You think that anything less than perfect to carry the general public around in the sky is going to happen in our lifetimes?

First you need to prove that these things will actually work. Then you need to prove they'll work in our airspace system with other manned aircraft. Then you need to prove beyond a shadow of any doubt that there are enough fail safes to not kill hundreds of people at a time in a crash. Then you need to sell the actual things to airlines.

Finally, you have 50,000+ ALPA and other union pilots who would be facing job losses. No way that they're gonna sit idly by allowing it to happen. Between the red tape and the political side of it, I'm pretty confident that I won't see an automated airliner carrying people in the US in my career (30ish years).
AYLflyer is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 07:14 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,870
Default

AI in a controlled environment works better than any human ever could. Lucky for us we don’t operate in such an environment. This technology will just another tool for pilots to use, not replace us.

Of course this will also be used a crutch for some yahoo operators, or mandatory SOP for some real dumb ones. But even then there will be pilots on board.
AllYourBaseAreB is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 08:43 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TheFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 2,300
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB View Post
AI in a controlled environment works better than any human ever could. Lucky for us we don’t operate in such an environment. This technology will just another tool for pilots to use, not replace us.

Of course this will also be used a crutch for some yahoo operators, or mandatory SOP for some real dumb ones. But even then there will be pilots on board.
yeah, but how many pilots on board? Asking for all the former flight engineers out there.
TheFly is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 08:57 AM
  #14  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,271
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast View Post
The automation won't have to be perfect. Just better than human. It will get there. The incidents and accidents that do happen will get a lot of attention. But when the public finally realizes that while it is imperfect, it's still better, full automation will take off everywhere.
The "Public" won't realize anything. They are inherently sympathetic to humans and human error.

Plaintiff's attorneys (and opportunistic pols) will play up the evil corporation and corrupt regulator angles to reap billions from automation accidents. Pilots, ATC, airlines will share none of the blame, it will be laid 100% at the feet of the manufacturers.

"Safer" isn't safe enough. It has to be a lot safer. And somehow that has to be proven.

Even then, good luck with certification. Government bureaucrats don't get paid to take chances to enhance corporate profits. And even then, some politicians would drum up a wave of public hysteria just for the media attention.

And MCAS probably set autonomous aircraft back by 20 years.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 10:59 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
C17B74's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: No Hats No Jackets No PAX
Posts: 1,504
Default

Totally agree, MAX debacle sets everything back as well as the 797 and COVID19 didn’t accelerate anything but empty seats. 797 had a 1 seat future variant to start chipping away the human form. No doubt it will happen, I just need to be retired when that does. 15-20 yrs left = probably safe. Those with more will be quite lonely prior to eventual dismissal or ground duty if it were to happen. Never discount possibilities - remember your dial phone. If someone successfully comes up with a molecular transporter we’re all through. “The Fly” had some growing pains so there’s that. Wouldn’t worry now, Cargo will be your first guinea pig anyways so there will be an actual heads up most likely. Besides, prior to execution COVID27 will rear it’s head.
C17B74 is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 12:34 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 399
Default

Originally Posted by C17B74 View Post
. 15-20 yrs left = probably safe. Those with more will be quite lonely prior to eventual dismissal or ground duty if it were to happen.
Lonely? The single seat fighter guys will be in their glory!

As mentioned, I don’t think it’s a technical issue. Liability will be a big part of it. That, and once one inevitably glitches and plummets to the earth, passengers will avoid it even more than they avoided the MAX.
firefighterplt is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 11:17 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
C17B74's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: No Hats No Jackets No PAX
Posts: 1,504
Default

Originally Posted by firefighterplt View Post
Lonely? The single seat fighter guys will be in their glory!.
True, domestically speaking as they are used to short legs and for the most part being busy. Being international that’s when the boredom, etc will set in. Granted lots of Netflix, Books, etc. Just did 5 legs this past week and 3 of them were 8, 9, and 10+ hour legs. I would miss the banter. Fun with good crews, a bad crew - rather be alone so there’s that if I ran into one, speaking cargo of course and not 10-20 crew members so the odds are against you...
C17B74 is offline  
Old 07-28-2020, 09:17 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,622
Default

A pilot will always be there. It is even written in the article in the last paragraph. This is just another level of automation.

Once we can be assured that our NAS system isn't susceptible to Sensor Attacks, Actuator Attacks, Insider Sabotage or C3 Attacks, then our airplanes will have no pilots. But that is a long time from now.
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 07-28-2020, 04:17 PM
  #19  
Super Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,549
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Airbus did a publicity stunt. It's not hard at all to taxi. TO, and land the military has been doing it for years.
And we've still managed to crash lots of them.

Originally Posted by firefighterplt View Post
Lonely? The single seat fighter guys will be in their glory!
Single seat guy here...having another pilot up there to BS with is one of the things I love about this job. That and being able to stand up, stretch and pee comfortably.
crewdawg is offline  
Old 07-28-2020, 04:30 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,916
Default NASA Chief: Uncrewed Aircraft 'Safer'

https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...r4IvrLs88kHstQ

Former F-18 Pilot and NASA Administrator says uncrewed aircraft will be safer than crewed. Right. I will say there will be no "gray" area with uncrewed as there is with crewed. No fudging wind limits, approach mins, etc. It'll be black and white. And probably some red when the computers encounter something they're not programmed for
AirBear is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices