Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Where My Doomers At? >

Where My Doomers At?

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Where My Doomers At?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2022, 09:01 AM
  #121  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,263
Default

NATO allies under-shooting their treaty-obligated defense spending is nothing new, and not surprising to anyone. Even DJT made a lot of hay about it.

Their spending habits have little relevance to RU's behavior in this case. But RU's behavior is probably going to have real significance on future EU defense spending (it already has). The reason they were slacking in the first place was because they fooled themselves into thinking there was no real threat, and that RU had joined the responsible community of nations. That even seemed like a reasonable assumption 20 years ago.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-29-2022, 10:29 AM
  #122  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,501
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
NATO allies under-shooting their treaty-obligated defense spending is nothing new, and not surprising to anyone. Even DJT made a lot of hay about it.
My very point. After the EU was unable to stop genocide on their own doorstep in the former Yugoslavia back in19, the EU themselves identified the requirement for increased defense spending and a 50,000 man European Rapid Deployment Force in 1992. The major EU political powers of the era -France, Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands- all agreed it was an absolute necessity, but nobody funded it and it never happened. George Bush (both of them actually) complained to the Europeans they were underfunding their defense, as did Clinton and Obama.


Their spending habits have little relevance to RU's behavior in this case. But RU's behavior is probably going to have real significance on future EU defense spending (it already has). The reason they were slacking in the first place was because they fooled themselves into thinking there was no real threat, and that RU had joined the responsible community of nations. That even seemed like a reasonable assumption 20 years ago.
This state of affairs long preceded the last 20 years. This has NEVER been about thinking that Russia was not a threat or that they had adequate forces to prevent things like the Bosnian genocide, they freely admit that in their own military and civilian budget documents, this has always been about not HAVING to pay the price because the Americans are doing it for us. That is absolutely clear in their own open documents. It was bad during the Cold War and it got considerably worse after 1990. And perhaps it will this time make a future difference in their defense spending but in a realistic real-time sense, that doesn’t even matter, because you can not make up for 30+ years of underinvestment in a short (5-10 year) timeframe, even if you weren’t crippled by energy and supply chain shortages. Most weapon systems are long lead time acquisitions.


https://tfiglobalnews.com/2022/10/25...-its-military/


Excargodog is offline  
Old 10-29-2022, 06:14 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 741
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido View Post
Won't argue that.
Napalm girl is a B&W image taken in '72 of a maimed 9 yo running out a friendly fire air strike. Whatever the grounds, US entanglement in foreign conflicts means supplemental death from above most of the time. Going to shut up now & wait for someone to explain how bringing down one more psychopathic marionette is adequate rationale for what we're diving into here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phan_Thi_Kim_Phuc
METO, I think we are talking past each other. Talking about different things.

I will not disagree that aerial bombing almost always results in obscene levels of death and injury to people whose only sin is happening to live near the bombing.
I will not disagree that the USA should not have it's military personnel become involved in the Ukraine/Russian war.

However, I strongly believe that the USA should provide as much military aid to Ukraine as they can use. All with the full knowledge that the at-risk physical body wielding this aid is Ukrainian. They are the ones that are mortally involved.
This is a fight where there is moral clarity. Ukrainie people know what they are fighting for. They will NOT resubmit to being a colony of the Russian colonizer again. Even if defeated in the short term, there will be a generational resistance to this foreign occupier.
Despite the best efforts of DJT to destroy NATO, it has been re-bolstered by the current administration and is now in a position to prevent the widening of this war to the Baltic Republics. Kaliningrad is still on an island. Suwalki and Sejny and Lake Wigry still stand in the way of Pan Putin. Contrary to what some posters here think, they WILL fight any invading Russians. Like Ukraine, they will fight with or without Western aid. Even if defeated, they will not be conquered. I suspect the same of Litwo.

Neither of the 2 great powers have won a war since WW2 (I will except Grenada), even though they have faced supposedly weaker and more poorly armed opponents. At some point one would think all these war college trained experts, be they Russian or American, would reevaluate the premises they have of what is actually involved in winning a war. I am convinced that Ukraine knows what it takes to win. I am also convinced that Russian leadership hasn't a clue.

This is Democracy and Liberal values against Authoritarianism and Fascism. A world ruled by International Standards or Piracy.

Any Ukrainian is faced with the stark reality of Trotsky's quote: "You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you"
This quote made me reevaluate my desire for pacifism as an imperative, and see the dangers of being an isolationist.
A Ukrainian, or Pole, or Lithuanian has no such luxuries as I have parsing the fine points of a Trotsky quote. They will fight.
"For our Freedom and Yours" are not empty words to them.
MaxQ is offline  
Old 10-29-2022, 06:21 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 741
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I've been using the term Red Army with a sarcastic bent, referencing Vlad's ambitions (delusions?).
I think both you and METO mean Red Army in some sort of sarcastic intent. I just wanted to highlight that Putin is attempting to draw on the moral bank earned from WW2 when there is reference to the Red Army.
Some, unfortunately, buy into it.
MaxQ is offline  
Old 10-30-2022, 02:34 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

Originally Posted by MaxQ View Post
METO, I think we are talking past each other..
True. You support the massive transfer of arms for this war. I consider it yet another breach of authority to provide for the common defense. It really pi$$es me off to be honest. Been digging graves for shady politics since the Treaty of Ghent, 1814.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 12-05-2022, 09:38 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,268
Default

Ukraine officially announced they are going to press this winter. I think we will see the original lines (absent crimea) by summer. Russia just couldn’t get a handle on what limitless and unstoppable recon over your lines can do to you (amongst other things, but I feel this is the most salient point). I’m interested to see if the momentum can stay strong.
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 12-05-2022, 10:54 AM
  #127  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,263
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped View Post
Ukraine officially announced they are going to press this winter. I think we will see the original lines (absent crimea) by summer. Russia just couldn’t get a handle on what limitless and unstoppable recon over your lines can do to you (amongst other things, but I feel this is the most salient point). I’m interested to see if the momentum can stay strong.
I suspect UR momentum will stay strong. All they really have to do is stay more motivated than RU, which doesn't look hard.

UR has better support and friends than RU, which is now relying on Iran for some high tech hardware. Maybe they'll buy some tanks from DPRK next Even PRC won't help them out directly.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-05-2022, 11:27 AM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,268
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I suspect UR momentum will stay strong. All they really have to do is stay more motivated than RU, which doesn't look hard.

UR has better support and friends than RU, which is now relying on Iran for some high tech hardware. Maybe they'll buy some tanks from DPRK next Even PRC won't help them out directly.
Christ can you imagine dprk tanks manned by conscripts? I hope at some point russia has the courage to just pull back and save everyone the heartache. At this point any loss of life is just a waste. Russia doesn’t have the ability to prosecute its strategic goals.
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 12-05-2022, 01:12 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,476
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
All they really have to do is stay more motivated than RU, which doesn't look hard.
Which mostly means a lot of fresh dead to gawk at.. Putin or not, the whatever they call themselves now, Z army had better come out of this with something. No way they just turn for home & say oh well, we tried.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 12-05-2022, 01:37 PM
  #130  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,263
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido View Post
Which mostly means a lot of fresh dead to gawk at.. Putin or not, the whatever they call themselves now, Z army had better come out of this with something. No way they just turn for home & say oh well, we tried.
Yeah that's a problem.
rickair7777 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices