Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
FAA rules regarding cockpit photography >

FAA rules regarding cockpit photography

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

FAA rules regarding cockpit photography

Old 03-08-2023, 10:42 AM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 4
Default FAA rules regarding cockpit photography

Greetings all,

I am wondering if anybody has any FAR reference for the use of GoPro cameras in the cockpit.

I am not interested in photography with an SLR but does leaving a gopro fixed to the side of the cockpit window violate any FAA rules?

It can go unattended from top of descent until shutdown so I cant imagine any issues with distraction/sterile cockpit etc.

Any guidance would be appreciated,

EW
Eurowanderer is offline  
Old 03-08-2023, 01:40 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,221
Default

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-1...ection-121.306
trip is offline  
Old 03-08-2023, 02:14 PM
  #3  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

This is the specific rule which applies to 121 cockpits: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-1...ection-121.542

Executive summary:

You cannot use any electronic device during block time which has the *ability* to connect via a wireless system, unless it's approved per your OPSPEC. Examples of approved devices: EFB's, and typically personal cell phones while on the ground with the brake set, to contact the company.

So you can use old school film cameras, and older digital cameras which don't have any wireless. Obviously not during sterile cockpit though.

People have gotten in trouble over this, usually after they post stuff on SM. I have a buddy who had his career derailed by such an event years ago.

That's the cliff's notes, and should keep you out of trouble. But you can go down a lot of rabbit holes with this...
there may be some unintended consequence with the wording of the law. You cannot use a device in airplane mode, doesn't matter if it's connected or not.

While the genesis of this was two NWA pilots who supposedly got distracted by a laptop and overflew their destination, the other concern behind the rule is that PEDs might interfere with aircraft systems.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-08-2023, 05:20 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: 777 all
Posts: 64
Default

Some years ago a jump seater filmed the approach and landing (I was unaware they were recording with their phone).

2 weeks later the chief pilot called me. The jump seater posted the landing without my knowledge, and our HR dept intercepted her social media post.

minor carpet dance and a letter to the company and FAA on my part cleared it up.

There are some in the regulatory side of the industry who will slap you for this potentially..
Dubiousbrother is offline  
Old 03-13-2023, 04:41 PM
  #5  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks all for the feedback and links provided, I appreciate the efforts.

However, I am still a little unclear about this.

FAR 121.306 does not refer to a particular stage of flight and therefore implies that at no stage can a PED be operated in flight (with the exceptions listed)?

FAR 121.542 is logical in prohibiting non essential duties during critical phases of flight. But the reference to a “personal wireless communications device” upon further exploration relates to “commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services” (332(c)(7)(C)(i) of the Com- munications Act)

Im not sure this really applies to non cellular blue tooth and wi fi that many cameras and GoPros have?

And FAR 121.542 refers to “duties” and “activities” under taken during critical phases of flight however a fixed GoPro suction cupped to the rear window does not require any operation from the pilot once it starts running and can be start and forget from cruise level to the gate.

Im just spit balling this and sorry to split hairs.
Eurowanderer is offline  
Old 03-15-2023, 07:15 AM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

Originally Posted by Eurowanderer View Post
Thanks all for the feedback and links provided, I appreciate the efforts.

However, I am still a little unclear about this.

FAR 121.306 does not refer to a particular stage of flight and therefore implies that at no stage can a PED be operated in flight (with the exceptions listed)?
Correct. The PED FAR and matching federal law apply from block out to block in.

The sterile cockpit rule does not *specifically* address PED use but ANY PED use other than company tools like EFB apps is obviously a sterile violation because it's non-essential to flight ops. That's well established. So basically you can't do any photography in sterile, using any type of camera. You also cannot bring an analog type-writer and type up your term paper in sterile, etc.

Originally Posted by Eurowanderer View Post
FAR 121.542 is logical in prohibiting non essential duties during critical phases of flight. But the reference to a “personal wireless communications device” upon further exploration relates to “commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services” (332(c)(7)(C)(i) of the Com- munications Act)

Im not sure this really applies to non cellular blue tooth and wi fi that many cameras and GoPros have?
Yes, this is one of the rabit holes I referred to. The problem is any regulatory action on the part of the FAA falls under admin law abd they have wide discretion to interpret intent. The NTSB almost always sides with the FAA. I can guarantee you that your penalties would be upheld. You might be able to appeal to the courts based on the FCC language, but that would be a long and expensive process, and you'd be out of work the whole time. And I kind of doubt you'd win.

Originally Posted by Eurowanderer View Post
And FAR 121.542 refers to “duties” and “activities” under taken during critical phases of flight however a fixed GoPro suction cupped to the rear window does not require any operation from the pilot once it starts running and can be start and forget from cruise level to the gate.
The problem as I see it is that you are still "using" the device even if it requires no operator intervention. If it has wifi capability, you're probably hosed. People have gotten in trouble and fired for this, and I know one personally.

You might be able to get permission from the company to use a static film setup like that, one that you don't touch between block out and block in, but that's the only way I'd feel comfortable. And it would have to have no wireless functionality at all; the company cannot waive federal law. But another problem is your suction cup setup isn't certified by any regulatory agency not to say fall off and create a distraction or damage something in turbulence. I don't think you'd get approval.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-15-2023, 07:17 AM
  #7  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,781
Default

We spend generations trying to keep cameras OUT of the cockpit, and all of the sudden the young folks want to bring their own and film EVERYTHING. 🙄
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 03-18-2023, 01:38 PM
  #8  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Correct. The PED FAR and matching federal law apply from block out to block in.

The sterile cockpit rule does not *specifically* address PED use but ANY PED use other than company tools like EFB apps is obviously a sterile violation because it's non-essential to flight ops. That's well established. So basically you can't do any photography in sterile, using any type of camera. You also cannot bring an analog type-writer and type up your term paper in sterile, etc.



Yes, this is one of the rabit holes I referred to. The problem is any regulatory action on the part of the FAA falls under admin law abd they have wide discretion to interpret intent. The NTSB almost always sides with the FAA. I can guarantee you that your penalties would be upheld. You might be able to appeal to the courts based on the FCC language, but that would be a long and expensive process, and you'd be out of work the whole time. And I kind of doubt you'd win.



The problem as I see it is that you are still "using" the device even if it requires no operator intervention. If it has wifi capability, you're probably hosed. People have gotten in trouble and fired for this, and I know one personally.

You might be able to get permission from the company to use a static film setup like that, one that you don't touch between block out and block in, but that's the only way I'd feel comfortable. And it would have to have no wireless functionality at all; the company cannot waive federal law. But another problem is your suction cup setup isn't certified by any regulatory agency not to say fall off and create a distraction or damage something in turbulence. I don't think you'd get approval.
Thanks very much for your detailed reply, I appreciate your efforts.

And yes I think it is better not to push up against some of these rules, fighting city hall just isnt worth it.

Its such a shame, the reults I have seen with very little effort can be rather impressive with modern 4K cameras and in reality can be obtained without any threat to flight safety.

Its a far cry from driving the old three holer with my Ricoh camera taking massively over exposed cockpit windows and under exposed cockpit interiors!

Thanks again.
Eurowanderer is offline  
Old 03-18-2023, 04:46 PM
  #9  
Speed Verified
 
Beech Dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 998
Default

Just fly the damn plane people. Geez.
Beech Dude is offline  
Old 03-18-2023, 05:36 PM
  #10  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude View Post
Just fly the damn plane people. Geez.
Yes indeed, thats exactly what I do, been doing it almost 40 years now.

But strapping a gopro to the cockpit and pressing play in no way distracts you from that task.

I do it all the time on my race car and dont even know its there until one of the mechanics reminds me to switch it off when the car is on the trailer!
Eurowanderer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FEtrip7
Cargo
38
02-16-2012 02:25 PM
vagabond
Safety
2
03-26-2011 10:36 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
2
12-10-2010 06:56 AM
Turbinebound
Major
4
09-12-2009 08:01 AM
forgot to bid
Major
15
11-25-2008 09:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices