Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Anyone see "Oppenheimer" film? >

Anyone see "Oppenheimer" film?

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Anyone see "Oppenheimer" film?

Old 07-26-2023, 09:26 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,373
Default

Originally Posted by Pervis View Post
The Japanese would have fought to the death, including women and children.
Only if the US government decided to invade, which was unnecessary. The Japanese government wanted to surrender.

Originally Posted by Pervis View Post
And I believe another big reason to use them was a demonstration to regimes like the Soviet Union, that they were indeed fearsome weapons and we would be willing to use them against any new aggressors.
I think the best course of action would have been to offer a live public demonstration in the south Pacific somewhere for both the Japanese and Soviet governments to see. No need to kill tens of thousands of civilians over a "demonstration."
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 07-26-2023, 09:38 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2021
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Only if the US government decided to invade, which was unnecessary. The Japanese government wanted to surrender.

I think the best course of action would have been to offer a live public demonstration in the south Pacific somewhere for both the Japanese and Soviet governments to see. No need to kill tens of thousands of civilians over a "demonstration."
They wanted to surrender with concessions. Considering the brutality the Japanese demonstrated in more than a decade of war killing millions, we refused to even consider them. Except for allowing the emperor to remain. A demonstration would not have convinced the Japanese or potential future aggressors that we had the resolve to use nukes for real.

Bill OReily, who was a historian before he became a talking head, did a good job with his book “Killing The Rising Sun”. It outlines the path that led to the decision to use them.
Pervis is offline  
Old 07-26-2023, 10:42 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,373
Default

Originally Posted by Pervis View Post
They wanted to surrender with concessions. Considering the brutality the Japanese demonstrated in more than a decade of war killing millions, we refused to even consider them.
Which was monumentally stupid and unjust on the part of the US government (to be expected).... especially since the US government provoked the Japanese government into attacking Hawaii in the first place.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 07-26-2023, 12:22 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,183
Default

Sonic flypaper. Monumentally stupidest troll post hangar talk 2023 twat award
METO Guido is offline  
Old 07-26-2023, 12:30 PM
  #25  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 37,798
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Do you have a source for that?
He's correct, but as others pointed out their position was not unconditional.

After PH, years of war, and various atrocities in various theaters the US was simply not in the mood for half measures. It was very personal.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-26-2023, 12:31 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2021
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Which was monumentally stupid and unjust on the part of the US government (to be expected).... especially since the US government provoked the Japanese government into attacking Hawaii in the first place.
I suppose the invasion of Manchuria in 1931 followed soon after of China and the slaughter of innocents had nothing to do with the sanctions we imposed upon Japan.
Pervis is offline  
Old 07-26-2023, 12:33 PM
  #27  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 37,798
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Which was monumentally stupid and unjust on the part of the US government (to be expected).... especially since the US government provoked the Japanese government into attacking Hawaii in the first place.
No the USG did not "provoke" anything. They simply stopped selling oil to a Nazi ally who was conducting imperialist expansion by force of arms in Asia. Duh.

JPN leadership was moronic if they thought they could engage in large-scale industrial warfare without having secured the key resources to fuel that. Actually I think they got backed into a corner by their own pride. Same would have precluded unconditional surrender most likely.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-26-2023, 12:40 PM
  #28  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 37,798
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
I think the best course of action would have been to offer a live public demonstration in the south Pacific somewhere for both the Japanese and Soviet governments to see. No need to kill tens of thousands of civilians over a "demonstration."
I suspect that's what we would opt to do today, with 20/20 hindsight.

But America was effing pizzed off in 1945, and everybodies loved ones had been coming home in body bags for four years.

Also they had very limited numbers of weapons at the time, with unknown reliability, and it's obvious that a single demo would not have been enough anyway. Hiroshima was actually the demo, and even that wasn't enough...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-26-2023, 02:00 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,373
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
No the USG did not "provoke" anything. They simply stopped selling oil to a Nazi ally who was conducting imperialist expansion by force of arms in Asia. Duh.
The Japanese government clearly considered the embargo by the US government an act of war and reacted as such. Granted it was ultimately a miscalculation on their part, but the US government provoked them into attacking Hawaii. If the US government hadn't embargoed Japan, then the Japanese government wouldn't have attacked Hawaii. Straight and simple.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 07-26-2023, 02:04 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,373
Default

Originally Posted by Pervis View Post
I suppose the invasion of Manchuria in 1931 followed soon after of China and the slaughter of innocents had nothing to do with the sanctions we imposed upon Japan.
None of the US government's business what the Japanese government was up to so long as it wasn't attacking or harming Americans.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
girlwithstyle
Hangar Talk
3
03-19-2011 03:01 AM
wrxsteve
Hangar Talk
0
12-24-2008 11:54 AM
wrxsteve
Hangar Talk
13
07-08-2008 12:33 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-29-2005 05:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread