Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Hangar Talk (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/hangar-talk/)
-   -   Healthcare and health (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/hangar-talk/148934-healthcare-health.html)

ReluctantEskimo 12-16-2024 03:24 AM

Healthcare and health
 

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield (Post 3861982)
There’s a lot of bloat in the giant bureaucracy that allows money to go to waste.See NextGen.

There's a lot of bloat in privatization that allows money to into shareholder's pockets. See the American healthcare system.

OOfff 12-16-2024 07:47 AM


Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo (Post 3861984)
There's a lot of bloat in privatization that allows money to into shareholder's pockets. See the American healthcare system.

i’m just here waiting for sonic to claim that the american healthcare system would work great if not for the government boot on the neck of united healthcare preventing them from helping people.

DogPit 12-16-2024 09:25 AM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3862035)
i’m just here waiting for sonic to claim that the american healthcare system would work great if not for the government boot on the neck of united healthcare preventing them from helping people.

We should model the Canadians system where euthanasia is now higher on a per capita basis than gun deaths in the US.

OOfff 12-16-2024 09:43 AM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862069)
We should model the Canadians system where euthanasia is now higher on a per capita basis than gun deaths in the US.

yeah, we probably should allow people to die on their own terms with medical assistance if they want to.

symbian simian 12-16-2024 10:37 AM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862069)
We should model the Canadians system where euthanasia is now higher on a per capita basis than gun deaths in the US.

Average age over 77 with foreseeable death in the future is a slightly different target audience (pun intended) than the about 20k pepole a year that didn't volunteer in the USA.

DogPit 12-16-2024 12:05 PM


Originally Posted by symbian simian (Post 3862101)
Average age over 77 with foreseeable death in the future is a slightly different target audience (pun intended) than the about 20k pepole a year that didn't volunteer in the USA.

What about them expanding it to mental health patients? Are they really volunteering?

OOfff 12-16-2024 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862126)
What about them expanding it to mental health patients? Are they really volunteering?

serious question: how much time have you spend reading candian law on the subject so you understand what guardrails are being proposed? i’m betting zero, but you still have a fully formed opinion on it.

Whoopsmybad 12-16-2024 12:13 PM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3862077)
yeah, we probably should allow people to die on their own terms with medical assistance if they want to.

I would assume he’s referring to the death panels.

DogPit 12-16-2024 12:13 PM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3862127)
serious question: how much time have you spend reading candian law on the subject so you understand what guardrails are being proposed? i’m betting zero, but you still have a fully formed opinion on it.

so the thing that’s happening isn’t happening? Typical response.

ReluctantEskimo 12-16-2024 12:50 PM


Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad (Post 3862128)
I would assume he’s referring to the death panels.

We have death panels here.

It's called "claim denied."

SonicFlyer 12-16-2024 12:52 PM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3862035)
i’m just here waiting for sonic to claim that the american healthcare system would work great if not for the government boot on the neck of united healthcare preventing them from helping people.


Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo (Post 3861984)
There's a lot of bloat in privatization that allows money to into shareholder's pockets. See the American healthcare system.

The US healthcare system is one of the most over regulated industries on the planet. Look up the phrases "Rent seeking" and "Regulatory capture"

SonicFlyer 12-16-2024 12:55 PM


Originally Posted by jerryleber (Post 3861949)
So, you can't name any in the last 110 years. I wonder why nobody uses the Austrian school's principles? Too funny.NASA? WTF?

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon

OOfff 12-16-2024 02:42 PM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3862145)
The US healthcare system is one of the most over regulated industries on the planet. Look up the phrases "Rent seeking" and "Regulatory capture"

yes, the only thing keeping them from providing a good service is that dang ol’ government stopping them from treating customers well and covering more illnesses and medications.

the fact that they’re rent-seeking sh**bag middlemen is purely because the government makes them be that.

symbian simian 12-16-2024 06:36 PM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862126)
What about them expanding it to mental health patients? Are they really volunteering?

That is delayed till 2027 to further study, so no guarantee that that will happen. A requirement for assisted suicide in Canada is that the patient has to request it, an independent observer has to acknowledge that, and two health proffesionals have to sign off. Yes, with the mentally ill it is possible that they are not acting in their own best interest. I am personally less worried about the mentally ill being treated, than all the people with mental health issues not receiving any treatment because they don't have health insurance.

symbian simian 12-17-2024 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862126)
What about them expanding it to mental health patients? Are they really volunteering?

And also, while we are talking about it:

The United States ranks last among 16 high-income, industrialized nations when it comes to deaths that could potentially have been prevented with timely access to effective health care, according to a Commonwealth Fund–supported study that appeared online in the journal Health Policy. According to the analysis, other nations lowered their preventable death rates an average of 31 percent between 1997–98 and 2006–07, while the U.S. rate declined by only 20 percent, from 120 to 96 per 100,000. At the end of the decade, the preventable mortality rate in the U.S. was almost twice that in France, which had the lowest rate—55 per 100,000.

DogPit 12-17-2024 07:52 AM


Originally Posted by symbian simian (Post 3862355)
And also, while we are talking about it:

The United States ranks last among 16 high-income, industrialized nations when it comes to deaths that could potentially have been prevented with timely access to effective health care, according to a Commonwealth Fund–supported study that appeared online in the journal Health Policy. According to the analysis, other nations lowered their preventable death rates an average of 31 percent between 1997–98 and 2006–07, while the U.S. rate declined by only 20 percent, from 120 to 96 per 100,000. At the end of the decade, the preventable mortality rate in the U.S. was almost twice that in France, which had the lowest rate—55 per 100,000.

Because a large majority of Americans don’t put a high priority on their health.

Hubcapped 12-17-2024 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862361)
Because a large majority of Americans don’t put a high priority on their health.

Do you think our current “for profit” healthcare system is working out?

2 truths can exist at the same time:
.gov is bloated and spends too much
some services should be handled by the government and not “for profit”

dmeg13021 12-17-2024 10:23 AM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862361)
Because a large majority of Americans don’t put a high priority on their health.

Or any other American's health. My choice, amirite?

OOfff 12-17-2024 10:46 AM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862361)
Because a large majority of Americans don’t put a high priority on their health.

what is it about americans that makes them place a lower priority on health than, say, residents of the uk or canada or chile?

DogPit 12-17-2024 12:31 PM


Originally Posted by Hubcapped (Post 3862408)
Do you think our current “for profit” healthcare system is working out?

2 truths can exist at the same time:
.gov is bloated and spends too much
some services should be handled by the government and not “for profit”

It was working a hell of a lot better before the "Affordable Care Act".

DogPit 12-17-2024 12:32 PM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3862435)
what is it about americans that makes them place a lower priority on health than, say, residents of the uk or canada or chile?

Considering I'm not in that group you are asking the wrong person.

OOfff 12-17-2024 02:50 PM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862473)
Considering I'm not in that group you are asking the wrong person.

but you made the claim

Gone Flying 12-17-2024 02:58 PM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862472)
It was working a hell of a lot better before the "Affordable Care Act".

lifetime maximums were great thing, amirite?

Same with people getting denied coverage because actuaries decided their health wasn’t profitable.

so great

Cyio 12-17-2024 03:32 PM


Originally Posted by Gone Flying (Post 3862529)
lifetime maximums were great thing, amirite?

Same with people getting denied coverage because actuaries decided their health wasn’t profitable.

so great

Our regular plan at WN in pre ACA and rocks. It’s the best one I have ever had.

Gone Flying 12-17-2024 04:44 PM


Originally Posted by Cyio (Post 3862539)
Our regular plan at WN in pre ACA and rocks. It’s the best one I have ever had.

That’s cool and all, but it does not address the fact plenty of people were dealing with things like reaching their lifetime max due to cancer, and no longer having health insurance. Or being denied any coverages due to complications from a bad accident.

Hubcapped 12-17-2024 06:21 PM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862472)
It was working a hell of a lot better before the "Affordable Care Act".

please answer the question

DogPit 12-18-2024 04:03 AM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3862526)
but you made the claim

And what’s your point?

DogPit 12-18-2024 04:05 AM


Originally Posted by Gone Flying (Post 3862553)
That’s cool and all, but it does not address the fact plenty of people were dealing with things like reaching their lifetime max due to cancer, and no longer having health insurance. Or being denied any coverages due to complications from a bad accident.

And now they can’t afford coverage.

OOfff 12-18-2024 06:59 AM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862619)
And what’s your point?

you claimed americans don’t care about their health as a reason the country falls behind in medically-preventable deaths. so what is it about americans that makes them care less than chileans or britons?

or were you just saying something without evidence or logic behind it as a way to avoid facing a hard issue?

DogPit 12-18-2024 11:44 AM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3862655)
you claimed americans don’t care about their health as a reason the country falls behind in medically-preventable deaths. so what is it about americans that makes them care less than chileans or britons?

or were you just saying something without evidence or logic behind it as a way to avoid facing a hard issue?

Are you clueless or do you not live here because it's pretty damned obvious.

OOfff 12-18-2024 12:18 PM


Originally Posted by DogPit (Post 3862775)
Are you clueless or do you not live here because it's pretty damned obvious.

what a great answer. since it’s so obvious, what specifically makes americans less likely to prioritize their health than the others i listed?

OpieTaylor 12-18-2024 01:24 PM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3862655)
you claimed americans don’t care about their health as a reason the country falls behind in medically-preventable deaths. so what is it about americans that makes them care less than chileans or britons?

Why are they so fat?

FangsF15 12-18-2024 04:11 PM

THREAD DRIFT
 
[mod input] Folks, please keep thread drift to a minimum. It's in the Forum rules to start a new thread. 32 posts is way too long to go before doing so.

RJSAviator76 12-29-2024 05:22 AM

Fundamental problem with healthcare industry, and food industry for that matter is that everything is profit-oriented vs. result-oriented. There's way more money to be made in treatments than in actual cures.

It's very similar with the food industry... I don't agree with Bernie Sanders on much, but I do agree with him when he talks about the food industry and how they're poisoning us. Next time you go to a grocery store, go take a look at your favorite products and see how much "added sugar" is there in the list of ingredients. Insane! Hell, go look at your regular beef jerky at the store or at the airport. The food industry puts sugar is in EVERYTHING. As a society, we've grown obese... why is that? Sugar. Cancer rates have also skyrocketed.... why is that? Obesity. Look at all these kids with various health issues. It wasn't like that before. What's changed? Obesity rates in our society.

It's pretty hard for Americans to "take care of themselves" when the entire food supply is riddled with foods that invariably lead to obesity, though it's not impossible. Next time at the grocery store, pay attention to the labels and steer clear of anything that has "added sugar." I think if we as society start rejecting sugar, the food industry being profit-driven will adapt as well, and not only that, but we'll also be healthier in general.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands