Airline Pilot Central Forums
1  2  3  4  5  11 
Page 1 of 21
Go to

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Hangar Talk (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/hangar-talk/)
-   -   Notable developments in Russo-Ukraine War 2 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/hangar-talk/152222-notable-developments-russo-ukraine-war-2-a.html)

Excargodog 02-04-2026 06:42 AM

Notable developments in Russo-Ukraine War 2
 
So far, on the diplomatic front, this sorts of covers it:

Quote:

A peace deal between Russia and Ukraine looks close, except on everything that matters

Three issues still block an agreement to end the war.
An excerpt:


Quote:

​​​​​​​As negotiators gear up for another round of U.S.-brokered talks to end the war in Ukraine, Moscow and Kyiv remain deadlocked over the core disagreements that have defined the conflict since it began.

On Monday, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said his negotiating team could meet with the Russians and Americans as soon as Sunday. The Ukrainian president is ready to sit down with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, according to his foreign minister Andrii Sybiha. But, Sybiha acknowledged, “the most sensitive issues are still unresolved.”

​​​​​​​

At this point the ‘sunk expense fallacy’ is working heavily on both sides. Nobody wants to concede anything because of how much this war has already cost them in casualties. And neither had great demographics even before they started taking casualties by the hundreds of thousands and - at least in the case of Ukraine - from massive outmigration of refugees.

MaxQ 02-04-2026 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Excargodog (Post 4000294)
So far, on the diplomatic front, this sorts of covers it:



An excerpt:





At this point the ‘sunk expense fallacy’ is working heavily on both sides. Nobody wants to concede anything because of how much this war has already cost them in casualties. And neither had great demographics even before they started taking casualties by the hundreds of thousands and - at least in the case of Ukraine - from massive outmigration of refugees.

What is the source?

Excargodog 02-04-2026 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaxQ (Post 4000352)
What is the source?

Ooops, sorry

https://www.politico.eu/article/peac...lenskyy-putin/



MaxQ 02-04-2026 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Excargodog (Post 4000354)

Thank you.

METO Guido 02-04-2026 03:38 PM

Bitter with the sweet. Anybody saying this thing’s near over is either up for election, paid to say it, naive or special needs frequent flyer. All of the above. Otoh, another Spring still sees KGB chest deep in killing fields.

Excargodog 02-04-2026 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by METO Guido (Post 4000519)
Bitter with the sweet. Anybody saying this thing’s near over is either up for election, paid to say it, naive or special needs frequent flyer. All of the above. Otoh, another Spring still sees KGB chest deep in killing fields.

Maybe yes, maybe no. When NATO nations are deporting Russian conscripts who deserted rather than fight in Ukraine back to Russia, you have to believe the Western European support for Ukraine is becoming…tenuous.


https://www.politico.eu/article/geor...ladimir-putin/FEBRUARY 4, 2026 4:00 AM CET
BY EVA HARTOG AND NETTE NÖSTLINGERWhen Russia sent Georgy Avaliani to fight in Ukraine, he did exactly what German leaders proposed: He ran.

A pacifist who fled the front after being forcibly conscripted, he says he survived beatings and mock executions in a “torture basement” before escaping Russia altogether.

Last week, Germany told him it would be safe to go back.


Some excerpts::

Quote:

Fleeing the war

Avaliani was among tens of thousands of Russians who were served call-up papers in September 2022 as part of Putin’s “partial mobilization” drive.

A construction engineer and father of three, Avaliani said he had made it clear from the outset that he wouldn’t fight. “This is not my war. I’m a pacifist,” he told POLITICO. But his appeals for an exemption on health and family grounds were rejected.“It’s useless to try to fight the system,” he said. “If it wants to devour you, it will devour you. So I decided I had to act.”

Within weeks of arriving at the front in eastern Ukraine, Avaliani fled — only to be captured and taken to what he describes as a “torture basement” in Russian-occupied Luhansk. There, he says, he was beaten and subjected to mock executions.

The conditions, he said, were “inhumane.”Returned to the front, he escaped again and was captured a second time. Finally, on his third try, he crossed into Belarus and from there traveled to Uzbekistan.

While Avaliani lived in hiding abroad, he said, police visited his home and questioned his wife. In 2025 he and his family were reunited and applied for political asylum in Germany.

Change of tune

The decision to return Avaliani marks a stark reversal from Germany’s stance at the start of Russia’s full-on invasion of Ukraine.

In September 2022, Marco Buschmann, then Germany’s justice minister, hailed the exodus of Russians of fighting age, saying on X that “anyone who hates Putin’s policies and loves liberal democracy is very welcome here in Germany.”

The interior minister at the time, Nancy Faeser, echoed that sentiment, telling the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung newspaper that “anyone who courageously opposes President Vladimir Putin’s regime and therefore puts themselves in grave danger can apply for asylum in Germany on grounds of political persecution.”

In 2022 and 2023 about one in 10 Russian men of military age who reached Germany received some form of legal protection from the country. In 2024 and 2025 that number dropped sharply to around 4 percent.The change coincided with a shift in the political climate.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s government, which took office last May, has led a crackdown on migration, hoping to lure voters away from the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) — now the largest opposition party in Germany’s Bundestag.

The rejection letter that Avaliani received, seen by POLITICO, stated he was unlikely to face persecution in Russia beyond a fine. Russia, it added, is no longer actively mobilizing men.When it comes to defectors like Avaliani, the letter concludes, there is no “considerable likelihood of concrete and sustained interest in them on the part of the Russian state or other actors.”

Carbon copy

Rights activists argue that the assessment of the German authorities denies what is going on in Russia.

Many who were mobilized and sent to the front in 2022 have yet to come home. Russia continues to recruit some 30,000 soldiers monthly.

The letter to Avaliani reads like a carbon copy of rejections sent to other defectors, said Artyom Klyga, a lawyer with Connection, an organization that helps conscientious objectors.
“It’s like they [the authorities] use a single Word document, a template that they slightly adapt,” Klyga said.
He argued that German authorities fail to distinguish between draft dodgers — men who fled the country to avoid being mobilized — and defectors like Avaliani, who were actually served call-up papers.

​​​​​​
Quote:

Out of 8,201 Russian men of military age who have applied for asylum in Germany since 2022, just 416 — about 5 percent — were granted some form of protection, such as being given asylum status, according to figures provided by the government in response to a parliamentary question.

Deserters presumably comprise a small minority of those cases, given the significant barriers faced by those who have already been drafted to make their way out of Russia and then on to Europe.

Alshansky, the A Farewell to Arms co-founder, argued that deporting people like Avaliani undercuts Europe’s promise to support Ukraine in its fight against Russia.

The asylum rejection “helps Putin to maintain the idea that it’s useless to run.” In fact, he said, the calculus is simple: “The more deserters there are, the easier it will be to defend Ukraine.”

METO Guido 02-05-2026 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Excargodog (Post 4000623)
Maybe yes, maybe no. When NATO nations are deporting Russian conscripts who deserted rather than fight in Ukraine back to Russia, you have to believe the Western European support for Ukraine is becoming…tenuous.:

Won’t extinguish resolve radiating like Chernobyl from the command bunker at Kiev. As Russia confronts a generation’s hardest resistance movement and its stoic prince, even they know one hundred years must pass until a becquerel of commitment to her fallen’s memory fades.



rickair7777 02-05-2026 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by METO Guido (Post 4000651)
Won’t extinguish resolve radiating like Chernobyl from the command bunker at Kiev. As Russia confronts a generation’s hardest resistance movement and its stoic prince, even they know one hundred years must pass until a becquerel of commitment to her fallen’s memory fades.

Unfortunately, RU's prospects are looking up to a degree.

Somewhat so for long-term resilience in the UA conflict, and also as a plausible threat to certain other east European countries, especially EE/LV/LT.

The unexpected twist (to me anyway) is that the RU people seem to have just gone along with converting the country into a war economy...

So we'd be looking at a somewhat dysfunctional, second-world economy spending 10+ % of GDP on combat power vs. some enlightened, somewhat more functional socialist utopias spending 1.2% of *their* GDP on said combat power.

Also RU has now developed a combat-experienced, combat-hardened cadre of soldiers. For those not aware, brutal conflicts are especially good at distilling out highly competent warriors... those who survive their early inexperience mostly keep surviving, and getting better.

Flip side of that is that the Ukrainians are probably the most competent EU-aligned military right now, along with PL (which has remained deeply suspicious of RU since 1989). While other EU militaries are staffed with conscripts obligated for a few months (but with labor union rules!).

Where RU wised up was with their own conscription... drafting youth to go die in a foreign war meat grinder is bad local politics. They still have mandatory national service (always have), but the invol conscripts are used in support roles away from the front lines while they now recruit volunteers (with money) for the combat part.

But the big thing still going against RU is massive attrition, at some point the tyranny of math will make future adventures untenable... might almost be better to just continue paying UA to keep attriting fighting-age russians for a while longer :rolleyes:

METO Guido 02-05-2026 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 4000666)
Unfortunately, RU's prospects are looking up to a degree.

Somewhat so for long-term resilience in the UA conflict, and also as a plausible threat to certain other east European countries, especially EE/LV/LT.

The unexpected twist (to me anyway) is that the RU people seem to have just gone along with converting the country into a war economy...

So we'd be looking at a somewhat dysfunctional, second-world economy spending 10+ % of GDP on combat power vs. some enlightened, somewhat more functional socialist utopias spending 1.2% of *their* GDP on said combat power.

Also RU has now developed a combat-experienced, combat-hardened cadre of soldiers. For those not aware, brutal conflicts are especially good at distilling out highly competent warriors... those who survive their early inexperience mostly keep surviving, and getting better.

Flip side of that is that the Ukrainians are probably the most competent EU-aligned military right now, along with PL (which has remained deeply suspicious of RU since 1989). While other EU militaries are staffed with conscripts obligated for a few months (but with labor union rules!).

Where RU wised up was with their own conscription... drafting youth to go die in a foreign war meat grinder is bad local politics. They still have mandatory national service (always have), but the invol conscripts are used in support roles away from the front lines while they now recruit volunteers (with money) for the combat part.

But the big thing still going against RU is massive attrition, at some point the tyranny of math will make future adventures untenable... might almost be better to just continue paying UA to keep attriting fighting-age russians for a while longer :rolleyes:

I get that, believe me. Still, no tossing in the towel while there’s still time. That would render all we’ve given false. Time to rally, not cut & run. Kremlin blackmail can’t be perceived to win.

Excargodog 02-05-2026 08:35 AM

Highly unfortunate.
 
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/0...-tool-00766655

The loss of a good reference source for serious students of international politics. It will be missed.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:07 PM.
1  2  3  4  5  11 
Page 1 of 21
Go to


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands