Warning Memphis Runway 9/27
This is a warning to all FedEx pilots who land at Memphis International on Runway 9/27. My name is Guy Cobb and I am a former FedEx Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery coordinator. In 2006 I discovered a defect with Runway 9/27 and presented it to FedEx Express Management. Immediately following the meeting I was told not to let this information get out into the public and to shred my documentation which I did but kept my original files. In November of 2008 I re-submitted my findings to Randy DiGirolamo of FedEx Express. Three weeks later the Memphis Airport Authority announced that the 65 year old runway would be completely replaced. Most of you may not realize that Runway 9/27 has a massive tunnel running directly beneath it. The defect is specific to this tunnel and it’s ability to support the runway above it. Because Express fast tracked the new runway to start in March of 2010 and had to be completed by December they made no provisions to reinforce the Hurricane Creek tunnel. I have asked the Memphis Airport Authority to allow for a public inspection of the tunnel for the past four months but they have refused. ALPA, Express, the Memphis Airport Authority and the FAA all know about the defect. All I am asking is that all of you read my Hurricane Creek Master Document on my documentation website and decide for yourselves. My documentation includes all structural diagrams, engineering studies and photographs of the tunnel and runway. The site address is here:
www.guycobb.com/coverup.htm Thank you and be safe. |
Well that explains why there was always a dip in the landing zone of 27. So we can expect it to sink again?
thanks for the info, Gary. Hope your efforts don't go unheeded. |
Originally Posted by guycobb
(Post 796335)
This is a warning to all FedEx pilots who land at Memphis International on Runway 9/27. My name is Guy Cobb and I am a former FedEx Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery coordinator. In 2006 I discovered a defect with Runway 9/27 and presented it to FedEx Express Management. Immediately following the meeting I was told not to let this information get out into the public and to shred my documentation which I did but kept my original files. In November of 2008 I re-submitted my findings to Randy DiGirolamo of FedEx Express. Three weeks later the Memphis Airport Authority announced that the 65 year old runway would be completely replaced. Most of you may not realize that Runway 9/27 has a massive tunnel running directly beneath it. The defect is specific to this tunnel and it’s ability to support the runway above it. Because Express fast tracked the new runway to start in March of 2010 and had to be completed by December they made no provisions to reinforce the Hurricane Creek tunnel. I have asked the Memphis Airport Authority to allow for a public inspection of the tunnel for the past four months but they have refused. ALPA, Express, the Memphis Airport Authority and the FAA all know about the defect. All I am asking is that all of you read my Hurricane Creek Master Document on my documentation website and decide for yourselves. My documentation includes all structural diagrams, engineering studies and photographs of the tunnel and runway. The site address is here:
www.guycobb.com/coverup.htm Thank you and be safe. |
The original structural studies by the AFRAM corporation commissioned by the Memphis Airport Authority to determine if the airport's runways, taxiways and overpasses could handle FedEx's A380's (on order at the time) stated that the rebar in the support walls should be #8 at six inches. The actual size is #4 at 12 inches. The photographs on my documentation page taken only ten days after the new runway reopened show a circular pattern directly over the tunnel. My concern is that this is being caused by the runway beginning to sink. The problem is no one will let me or anyone else inspect the tunnel and runway.
The other issue I'm concerned with is the NTSB's findings related to the FedEx MD-11 accident on Runway 9/27 in 2004. I do not believe it was pilot error but no one with ALPA will connect me to the pilots who were involved. The NTSB keeps saying it was a "bounced landing" but I believe the condition of the runway at the time caused the aircraft to suddenly pitch upward first after what was perceived by the pilots as a normal landing, and then the bounce took place, followed by the tailstrike. This tailstrike would have dragged directly across the tunnel crossing and I believe was the likely cause for the damage to the tunnel's ceiling that the Airport Authority has been trying to hide for so long. |
Have you brought this to the media?
|
Might also want to post this in the majors. I don't work for Fedex but I go into MEM weekly and I don't think I'll be accepting 27.
|
Originally Posted by The Walrus
(Post 796405)
Have you brought this to the media?
Get it to Andy Wise or Mike Matthews. I don't know which stations they work for. And then if it goes to national media something will change. I can see purple accepting the risk but the pax carriers could never accept it if the media gets hold of it. I hope you are watching your back very carefully Guy. |
Originally Posted by The Walrus
(Post 796405)
Have you brought this to the media?
|
Originally Posted by shfo
(Post 796407)
Might also want to post this in the majors. I don't work for Fedex but I go into MEM weekly and I don't think I'll be accepting 27.
|
I KNEW there was a reason I couldn't grease it in on runway 9/27.............and 18/36 L,R and Center. You had me at hello...........
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands