Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums - Find your next job as a Pilot > >
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.

View Poll Results: Cirrus Vision SF50: Would You Buy This Jet?
Yes. 3 27.27%
No. But, I Might Consider a Competitor (Specify Which) 3 27.27%
No. 4 36.36%
Other ________ 1 9.09%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-11-2010, 07:17 AM   #21
Gets Weekends Off
ryan1234's Avatar
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,235

Call me crazy.. it'd say neither... give me an older Citation
ryan1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 08:16 AM   #22
Thread Starter
Cubdriver's Avatar
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 5,992

Let's gather all our guns and go for a little ride in this thing.

Cubdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2010, 04:26 PM   #23
On Reserve
Captain Krusty's Avatar
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Small Jet Captain
Posts: 18

As far as I am concerned the Cirrus Jet doesn't even exist yet. When they have delivered and have it fully certified it to do what they say it will do I will believe it. Otherwise, I am just waiting for another failure.

I would not buy one. Too many MUCH cheaper and better alternatives and too many far superior aircraft for around the same price.

If I had that much money to spend on a jet I would buy an older, Citation II, V, Bravo, CJ, or Sierra Mod 500/550 taking into consideration the increase in fuel burn and MX costs compared to the Cirrus Jet.

The service ceiling is only FL250. Less than a lot of turboprops and puts you right in the middle of most of the weather you don't want to be in.

It is very slow

It has 1 engine

Has no range

I doubt it has much payload with full fuel when it finally delivers.

I think this will be a great marketing opportunity for Cirrus to sell them to current Cirrus owners.

I fear for the aircraft's safety record. Another attempt to put non-professional pilots in an aircraft that may be too much to handle for them. The Cirrus SR22 has a very high number of fatal accidents. Now increase speed to 300 knots from 180, and let's see what happens.
Captain Krusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2010, 06:22 PM   #24
Gets Weekends Off
BushwickBill's Avatar
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: BE-20 PIC
Posts: 140

I risk IDing a few people by posting this but I had a good experience with VLJs a while back. I took an owner operator to go see his Adam 500 a few years ago. He eventually took delivery of the 500 and had a deposit on the 700. He wanted to fly the thing himself and in my opinion he didn't have the background to do that.

On the way out to APA I was talking with the captain and I said "you know he should forget the Adam500 and go buy a used Cj1 and have someone else fly it." Needless to say after the dust settled he has a very expensive Adam500 doorstop parked next to his hangar and a used Cj1 and a pro pilot.

Personally I don't give owner operators a lot of credit. It is just my opinion and I have that opinion purely from my own experience. If you have the money for a light jet get a pro pilot. After my experience with the TBM and listening to all of the accidents that my instructor told me about I don't think there are a lot of 180 knot plus airplanes out there that should be owner operated.

I would never ever buy a new unproven airplane from a manufacturer that did not have a significant amount of experience building the type of aircraft I was considering buying. Cirrus is a tough call because I think the single engine airplanes that they make are pretty nice. Although they have killed a lot of people. At the Palo Alto flying club we used to call them the dot com killer. The modern day version of the V tail doctor killer. I think this has more to do with the owner operator problem however.

This just seems like another bad idea destined for failure. I'd buy a used Cj1 or a TBM700 C2. Also I would get a pro pilot to fly it. Unless all I did was fly and there is no way you could make enough money flying to own any of the airplanes we are talking about.
BushwickBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 08:37 AM   #25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 233

SF-50 = junk.

Spend the 1-2 million on a B-200, Turbo Commander or TBM and get a real airplane.
quimby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 01:08 PM   #26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 436

I'm kind of a fan of the TBM or the PC-12.
Pratt REALLY needs a FADEC on those PT-6's though.
Add that and they would be PERFECT!!!

I also stand by the: "If it floats, flies, or fornicates, rent it"

(with notable exceptions)
CrimsonEclipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 10:22 PM   #27
Thread Starter
Cubdriver's Avatar
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 5,992

News clip on the HondaJet. I am always amazed how patient and thorough this pet-of-a-project is having witnessed the company attempt to make only one rather simple airplane for about a decade now. In about 2050 Honda will send out a press release saying, ok folks our little creation is truly and finally finished and we could certainly sell you one if we felt like it, but nobody really uses jets anymore because of all the teletransporters in existence, so you can't have one and don't need one anyway; but it was a lot of fun to work on this for 50 years!


Honda Flies Its Conforming Jet

(FLYING e-Newsletter, 12/23) The first HondaJet configured for production flew earlier this week from the company's research and development facility in Greensboro, North Carolina. The new Model HA-420 HondaJet differs from the proof of concept version in that it uses more powerful engines - GE Honda Aero HF120s replacing the earlier HF118 versions. It also has enhanced aerodynamics that improve static stability and decrease drag, according to Honda Aircraft President and CEO Michimasa Fujino. The HondaJet is most recognizable for its unusual over-the-wing engine pylons. The design was chosen over the conventional tail-mounted engines to maximize cabin interior volume by eliminating the need for engine-mount carry-through structure in the aft section of the fuselage. Wind tunnel testing has shown that by carefully arranging the shape and angle of the over-wing pylons, Fujino has been able to match the drag numbers of a clean wing. The HondaJet that flew this week also incorporates the Garmin G3000 touchscreen avionics suite. It shares with the Piper Altaire single-engine jet the distinction of being launch customers for the system. The first flight lasted 51 minutes, reaching 12,500 feet and about 180 knots. The landing gear was not retracted on the first flight. Honda Aircraft had predicted first flight of the conforming aircraft before year end and expects deliveries of the HA-420 to begin in the third quarter of 2012.
Cubdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 10:27 PM   #28
Gets Weekends Off
pokey9554's Avatar
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Cessna 150
Posts: 590

No, I would not buy this jet. I am short $1,720,000.

Last edited by pokey9554; 12-23-2010 at 11:02 PM.
pokey9554 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2010, 01:23 PM   #29
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 34

I would love me a PC-12 or TBM....Out of the jets, I'd take the Honda.
BeRich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 07:19 AM   #30
Thread Starter
Cubdriver's Avatar
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 5,992

Maybe I was wrong. HAC seems to be aggressively testing a few HA-420 prototypes in Greensboro and they claim they are going to deliver a few to customers in 2012. I wonder how the icing certification is coming along.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~

HondaJet Flies At Maximum Speed.

The Greensboro (NC) News & Record (3/30, Barron) reports, "The first HondaJet that conforms to FAA regulations for testing has now been flown at its maximum speed of 489 mph [425 kts] at 30,000 feet, the company said Tuesday." Furthermore, during the flight, the plane "hit a slightly higher speed than the company had predicted." Honda Aircraft CEO Michimasa Fujino "said that wings made of high-tech composites and new engines that are mounted on top of the wings have proven to make the aircraft especially maneuverable and responsive."

Diamond Suspends D-Jet Development.

Flight International (3/29, Sarsfield) reported, "Diamond has suspended development of its D-jet personal jet and temporarily laid off 213 employees at its London Ontario facility." The cuts had to be made because the industry was "severely hit by the financial downturn" and Diamond and other personal jet orders were "ravaged." Diamond president Peter Maurer said the company had hoped for "a positive response to our request for a federal government loan."

Last edited by Cubdriver; 03-30-2011 at 07:31 AM.
Cubdriver is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
anybody riding motorcycles? mxaexm Hangar Talk 146 01-03-2013 01:19 AM
My Cirrus Jet encounter abelenky Hangar Talk 7 09-29-2009 08:02 AM
Guitars Runner Hangar Talk 16 06-01-2009 09:34 AM
Jet University Out of Business TPROP4ever Flight Schools and Training 49 05-23-2009 03:36 PM
Cirrus Light Jet F172Driver Hangar Talk 9 01-20-2009 04:35 AM

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 AM.

vBulletin® v3.9.3.3, Copyright ©2000-2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Internet Brands, Inc.