Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
America just got fatter >

America just got fatter

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

America just got fatter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2007, 03:44 PM
  #1  
Che Guevara
Thread Starter
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default America just got fatter

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070319/...380_to_america

NEW YORK - The latest jetliner to claim the title of world's biggest passenger aircraft completed its inaugural flight to the United States on Monday, flying on football field-length wings and a prayer that airlines will want to shell out $300 million to buy the behemoth double-decker jet.
ADVERTISEMENT

The four-engine Airbus A380 descended from a sunny sky and touched down at John F. Kennedy International Airport at about 12:10 p.m. EDT, to the cheers of onlookers. As the plane made its way toward the terminal, a pilot waved an American flag. Minutes later, a separate A380 arrived in Los Angeles, with just a crew and no passengers.

The first U.S. flights are a chance for plane builder Airbus and German airline Lufthansa AG to show off the jewel of Airbus' offerings to potential American buyers and to the airports they hope to turn into flight bases for the jet.

The 239-foot-long jet can seat as many as 550 passengers, hold 81,890 gallons of fuel, cruise at 560 mph and fly some 8,000 nautical miles.

Despite the plane's impressive statistics, Airbus has yet to sell any of the planes to U.S. carriers. The A380 comes with a pricetag of about $300 million, although that figure varies depending on the airline's order, said John Leahy, chief of operations for Airbus.

Leahy called the A380 the flagship jetliner for the 21st century, much like the Boeing 747 was in the last century. Airbus has about 160 global orders from 15 airlines for the new plane, which has already made tests flights in Europe and to Asia.

Waiting in the wings, however, is Boeing Co., which now has competitors to the A380 in early production.

The U.S. flight marked one of the highest-profile maiden trans-Atlantic voyages since 1969, when the Concorde, the world's first and only commercial supersonic transport, arrived at JFK from London. The European-made Concorde was retired from British and French service in 2005.

Airbus has been beset by management and financial problems, including a two-year delay to the A380 that wiped out more than $6.61 billion in forecast profits. The flight is a chance to prove that the plane will be ready when the first deliveries are made in October.

Airbus is seeking to recoup its losses by cutting 10,000 jobs and spinning off or closing six of its European manufacturing plants. Louis Gallois, co-chief executive of parent company European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co., said Airbus has endured "the worst year" in its history.

Lufthansa chief pilot Juergen Raps, who flew the A380 to New York, said that despite the superjumbo jet's size, it was nimble and responsive.

"If I were to compare it to driving, you would think this would be like driving a truck or a bus," he said inside the plane's cockpit. "It's like driving a Ferrari."

The air show began early Monday at Frankfurt International Airport when the plane took off as Lufthansa Flight 8940 for the eight-hour trip to Kennedy. Onboard were nearly 500 people, including pilots, Airbus crew members, 23 Lufthansa cabin crew and several hundred passengers, mostly Airbus and Lufthansa employees along with some reporters.

The flight operated as if it were a commercial one with full dining and entertainment services.

A separate inaugural Los Angeles flight originated in Toulouse, France. With only 23 people aboard, an Airbus crew flew the A380 to Los Angeles for airport "compatibility" tests.

About a thousand onlookers lined up along fences at that airport to see the plane make its West Coast debut. The facility nearly lost out on the highly anticipated landing after Airbus announced plans to land the jet in New York instead. The company revised its plan to allow for arrival at both locations.

France-based Airbus said the plane will perform tests at the California airport, including airfield maneuvers and docking at the terminal gate. The airport, the fifth-busiest worldwide, is expected to be the first U.S. destination for the A380 when it enters commercial service.

Paul Haney, deputy executive director for airport and security of Los Angeles World Airports, called the plane a "beautiful landing."

"Although it's the largest commercial airline in the sky, it's quiet and fuel efficient. That means less noise and lower emissions," Haney said, speaking by telephone from inside the aircraft.

Anthony Coscia, chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, said Monday's flight marked the beginning of a new era in meeting the New York City area's transportation needs. He says the A380 will generate millions of dollars in economic activity each year.
I had always been told it couldn't land at any US airports except Denver. Guess whoever was saying that was wrong. LA and JFK are some pretty big hubs to lose to this thing.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 03:55 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Velocipede's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 737NG CA
Posts: 766
Default

LAX has been undergoing some major reconstruction to handle the superjumbos. So has YVR.
Velocipede is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 04:23 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryane946's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: FO, looking left
Posts: 1,057
Default

SFO was one of the few that could handle it before any construction was done.

Denver's longest runway is 16,000ft by 200ft. This runway runs north/south. The 200ft wide is good for the A380, but I don't know if the 16,000ft will cut it year round. It is typically 80 degrees or warmer in May, June, July, August, and September, and that can translate into 8-9,000ft density altitudes. Even higher on those 100 degree days. The density altitude on a day where it is 90 degrees or warmer will probably prohibit a loaded A380 from operating on this massive runway!!

The other thing is Denver's east/west runways are 12,000ft long. For those of you who have lived/know the Denver area, you know VERY strong mountain winds often rip in from the west. On those windy days, airplanes may only be using the east/west runways, prohibiting the A380 from operating there.
ryane946 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyingA320
Major
195
09-19-2007 09:15 AM
fireman0174
Major
3
12-27-2006 03:14 PM
Sir James
Major
13
05-24-2006 06:16 AM
Sir James
Major
1
01-05-2006 07:59 PM
Gordon C
Regional
0
04-21-2005 06:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices