Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Closed
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-09-2016, 01:43 PM   #1061  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 7,981
Default

Will they allow you to shoot the polar bears from the deck, or do you have to hop on an ice berg?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 09-09-2016, 02:08 PM   #1062  
Moderator
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 5,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman49 View Post
What a horrible-looking cruise! They should compensate those unfortunate passengers with a free cruise to Cuba!
tomgoodman is online now  
Old 09-10-2016, 07:25 AM   #1063  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post

Will they allow you to shoot the polar bears from the deck?
Yes, provided that you are a eco-pilot concerned about man-made global warming while routinely firing up and flying your carbon-spewing jet (after driving to the airport, of course). Appearances and standards must be maintained after all.

SayAlt is offline  
Old 09-12-2016, 07:29 PM   #1064  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,623
Default

Data.GISS: GISTEMP Update: NASA Analysis Finds August 2016 Another Record Month
iceman49 is offline  
Old 09-12-2016, 10:47 PM   #1065  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 7,981
Default

There is no truth to the rumor that chicken little is the official NASA mascot, it remains the boy who cried "record warm temperature" every month. You would think after 27 years in a row of the hottest year on record the temperature would be approaching 130 in South Dakota.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 09-14-2016, 05:45 PM   #1066  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,500
Default

For those of us who were actually alive back in the 60's/70's and remember the hippies protesting nuclear power and such, not the wet-behind-the-ears youngsters of today drinking the Kool-Aid of revisionist's history...


Massive Cover-Up Exposed: Lying Alarmists Rebranded 70s Global Cooling Scare as a Myth

Everyone knows that before the global warming scare began in the 1980s, scientists were much more worried about global cooling and the coming ice age.

At least everybody did till a cabal of lying climate alarmists – one then a senior administrator at NOAA, now a president at the World Meteorological Association – hijacked Wikipedia, published a lying paper, and rewrote history by painting the 1970s Global Cooling Scare as an urban myth.

Now the full extent of these activist' skullduggery has been uncovered by researcher Kenneth Richard, writing at No Tricks Zone.

Richard shows that during the 1960s and 1970s, there was an 86 percent scientific consensus that the planet was on a cooling path. But this was airbrushed out of history so successfully that even now if you do a Google search on “70s global cooling scare” the top results claim it never really happened.

The top result is this one from Wikipedia on Global Cooling, which says:
This hypothesis had little support in the scientific community, but gained temporary popular attention due to a combination of a slight downward trend of temperatures from the 1940s to the early 1970s and press reports that did not accurately reflect the full scope of the scientific climate literature, which showed a larger and faster-growing body of literature projecting future warming due to greenhouse gas emissions.
This is flat-out untrue – in fact the vast majority of scientific papers (220 out of 264) supported the cooling thesis – and makes a mockery of Jimmy Wales’s oft-expressed desire to reduce Wikipedia’s outrageous left-wing bias.

Possibly, the misleading entry is a hangover from the extraordinary period in which William Connolley, a Green party member – then working for the British Antarctic Survey – was able to abuse his Wikipedia administrator status by rewriting thousands of Wikipedia articles in order to give them the ‘correct’ alarmist spin. This scandal was exposed by Lawrence Solomon in the National Post.

All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand.

When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions. Acolytes whose writing conformed to Connolley’s global warming views, in contrast, were rewarded with Wikipedia’s blessings. In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement.

The Medieval Warm Period disappeared, as did criticism of the global warming orthodoxy. With the release of the Climategate Emails, the disappearing trick has been exposed. The glorious Medieval Warm Period will remain in the history books, perhaps with an asterisk to describe how a band of zealots once tried to make it disappear.
Connolley was an associate of the alarmist propaganda site RealClimate which he co-founded with several of the world’s most egregious alarmists, among them, Michael “Hockey Stick” Mann and Gavin Schmidt, notorious for his data manipulations at NASA.

It was Connolley too who co-authored the hugely influential and utterly mendacious 2008 paper The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Consensus . Another of its authors Thomas C Peterson was formerly Principal Scientist at NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Education and now rejoices in the title President of the World Meteorological Association’s Commission for Climatology.

It falsely claimed:
[T]he following pervasive myth arose [among skeptics]: there was a consensus among climate scientists of the 1970s that either global cooling or a full-fledged ice age was imminent. A review of the climate science literature from 1965 to 1979 shows this myth to be false. … During the period from 1965 through 1979, our literature survey found 7 cooling, 20 neutral, and 44 warming papers. … There was no scientific consensus in the 1970s that the Earth was headed into an imminent ice age. Indeed, the possibility of anthropogenic warming dominated the peer-reviewed literature even then.
But as Kenneth Richard explains here, it did so by deliberately and cynically excluded many papers inconvenient to its lying thesis:
As will be shown here, the claim that there were only 7 publications from that era disagreeing with the presupposed CO2-warming “consensus” is preposterous. Because when including the papers from the 1960s and 1970s that indicated the globe had cooled (by -0.3 C between the 1940s and ’70s), that this cooling was concerning (leading to extreme weather, drought, depressed crop yields, etc.), and/or that CO2’s climate influence was questionable to negligible, a conservative estimate for the number of scientific publications that did not agree with the alleged CO2-warming “consensus” was 220 papers for the 1965-’79 period, not 7. If including papers published between 1960 and 1989, the “non-consensus” or “cooling” papers reaches 285.

Again, these estimates should be viewed as conservative. There are likely many dozen more scientific papers from the 1960s-’70s cooling scare era that would probably fall into the category of a “cooling” paper, but have not yet been made available to view in full online.
Perhaps the biggest irony of Connolley’s and Peterson’s trashy, junk-science paper is the bit where it pontificates about lousy scientists abusing data for political ends.

“Underlying the selective quotation of the past literature is an example of what political scientist Daniel Sarewitz calls ‘scientization’ of political debate: the selective emphasis on particular scientific ‘facts’ to advance a particular set of political values. In this case, the primary use of the myth is in the context of attempting to undermine public belief in and support for the contemporary scientific consensus about anthropogenic climate change by appeal to a past “consensus” on a closely related topic that is alleged to have been wrong.”
Scientization is, of course, what climate alarmists do all the time in order to support their bankrupt (but highly lucrative) thesis. Such is their brazen shamelessness, indeed, that you can’t help wondering whether – along with a worthless degree in something like environmental sciences from somewhere like the University of East Anglia – the main requirement for thriving in the world of climate science is the personality of a psychopath.


SayAlt is offline  
Old 09-14-2016, 09:21 PM   #1067  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,372
Default

So let me get this straight, there's a huge government conspiracy to make people believe in global warming, but the government is not laying down chemtrails? Since we are all pilots, you probably won't be able to understand the irony.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 09-15-2016, 05:03 AM   #1068  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,768
Default

xkcd: Earth Temperature Timeline

Scroll down to the bottom
Flytolive is offline  
Old 09-15-2016, 05:45 AM   #1069  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 7,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
So let me get this straight, there's a huge government conspiracy to make people believe in global warming, but the government is not laying down chemtrails? Since we are all pilots, you probably won't be able to understand the irony.
No, no one is in Government to make money. They all want to serve their fellow man. The Clintons and Harry Reid hate rich people and give away their cash as quick as they can. There is no money in global warming just ask Al Gore.

Why there isn't any money once you leave government either, particularly if you preach the right (left) sermons.

"Powell then went on a digression to complain that Clinton had ruined a planned speaking appearance of his at an unspecified university by visiting before him and charging an exorbitant fee."
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 09-15-2016, 09:50 AM   #1070  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 7,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flytolive View Post
xkcd: Earth Temperature Timeline

Scroll down to the bottom
From your chart it seems the Internet is causal why are you guys b!+(hing about CO2?
FDXLAG is offline  
 
 
 

 
Closed
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Part 135 change in personnel requirements CLewis Part 135 5 07-11-2011 07:35 PM
XJ 9E 9L SLI Thread FlyJSH Regional 666 05-22-2011 06:43 PM
Jeppesen Guided Flight Discovery DVDs Gajre539 The Boneyard 0 07-19-2010 02:45 PM
Mesa Chap 11 Filling hslightnin Mesa Airlines 207 01-07-2010 07:33 PM
Glide Slope... BEWELCH Flight Schools and Training 43 03-21-2007 10:42 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 PM.