|
Originally Posted by N2264J
(Post 1098083)
There is a video series called "How It All Ends" that will provide insight into the
problem and answer many of his questions. It's an excellent primer on the subject. The whole series of free videos takes between 4 and 5 hours but he'll pick up a lot. The link below "The Mechanics of Global Climate Change" is a good place to start. This section takes 30 minutes: How It All Ends: Mechanics of GCC (pt 1 of 3) - YouTube Just a hint, but if it takes a guy in a clown suit five hours to "explain" what you want us to believe, then you may be limiting your audience. If it is all the same to you, I would much rather read something that contains actual results, proofs and data-not just pure speculation. Most of us are very open to reasonable evidence presented by people not intending to defraud the public. |
Re: Climategate--The Final Chapter
Originally Posted by jungle
(Post 1097425)
They can't respond, it ruins the magic spell.
Originally Posted by jungle
(Post 1098098)
Most of us are very open to reasonable evidence presented by people not intending to defraud the public.
I do. That pretty much sums up your rebuttal strategy, doesn't it? |
Originally Posted by N2264J
(Post 1098524)
So you mock me when I don't respond and then disparage my integrity when
I do. That pretty much sums up your rebuttal, doesn't it? It should be fairly simple, just explain as far back as the last two ice ages on Earth, describe the mechanism involved with those two massive climate changes. For extra credit: Has the Earth been both much cooler and much warmer during that period of time? What exactly is the proper temperature for Earth? What method do you use to determine that temperature? How would you alter that temperature if it was incorrect? |
Originally Posted by jungle
(Post 1098543)
We asked for a response on the geologic/climate record prior to man's existence and how it managed to be both warmer and cooler without people driving SUVs and practicing capitalism, what we got was five hours of a guy dressed like a clown who did not speak to this point.
It should be fairly simple, just explain as far back as the last two ice ages on Earth, describe the mechanism involved with those two massive climate changes. |
Originally Posted by N2264J
(Post 1098524)
So you mock me when I don't respond and then disparage my integrity when
I do. That pretty much sums up your rebuttal strategy, doesn't it? WW |
Originally Posted by Winged Wheeler
(Post 1098757)
at least he didn't call you a sociopath.
WW |
Even people that don't stay at a Holiday Inn Express are aware that Earth cools and warms in cycles. There is no point in arguing about that.
The debate is over how much, if any, man is contributing to the current level and rate of warming. Many of you geniuses seem to agree with the minute percentage of qualified scientists that believe humans are not a significant factor in global warming...Rather than the overwhelming majority of scientists, that believe "human induced green house warming" is now occurring. Now, unlike you APC climatology experts...I'm not completely sure. But, I'm inclined to go with the majority of people that are qualified to have an opinion that anyone should really care about. And, that group of people certainly doesn't include any of you. Just sayin'.:p |
THIS is what it's really about.
United Nations climate envoys have proposed the creation of a global "climate court" that would be responsible for enforcing a sprawling set of rules requiring developed countries to cut emissions while compensating poorer countries in order to pay off a "historical climate debt." In one section, the document calls for developed countries to help poorer countries with "finance, technology and capacity building" so they can "adapt to and mitigate climate change" while helping eliminate poverty. Another section provides that developing countries should receive an amount of money equal to the amount "developed countries spend on defense, security and warfare." Thats ALL you need to know. U.N. Floats Global 'Climate Court' To Enforce Emissions Rules | Fox News Durban: what the media are not telling you | Watts Up With That? It's all about the Benjamin's. WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION( with billions also pocketed by the usual crowd). |
Re: Climategate--The Final Chapter
Originally Posted by jungle
(Post 1098543)
We asked for a response on the geologic/climate record prior to man's existence and how it managed to be both warmer and cooler without people driving SUVs and practicing capitalism, what we got was five hours of a guy dressed like a clown who did not speak to this point.
|
Originally Posted by Zoot Suit
(Post 1099586)
THIS is what it's really about.
United Nations climate envoys have proposed the creation of a global "climate court" that would be responsible for enforcing a sprawling set of rules requiring developed countries to cut emissions while compensating poorer countries in order to pay off a "historical climate debt." In one section, the document calls for developed countries to help poorer countries with "finance, technology and capacity building" so they can "adapt to and mitigate climate change" while helping eliminate poverty. Another section provides that developing countries should receive an amount of money equal to the amount "developed countries spend on defense, security and warfare." Thats ALL you need to know. U.N. Floats Global 'Climate Court' To Enforce Emissions Rules | Fox News Durban: what the media are not telling you | Watts Up With That? It's all about the Benjamin's. WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION( with billions also pocketed by the usual crowd). "The main vice of capitalism is the uneven distribution of prosperity. The main vice of socialism is the even distribution of misery". Ally |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands