Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Tool of the day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2018, 01:35 PM
  #10741  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Keizer Soze View Post
Flight instructor who openly discourages students love and passion for flying by commenting negatively on the students choice of apparel.
Save the Top Gun jackets for the ones that .....I don't know....actually serve in the military (or have served).

Bonus points if said person was involved in active combat.
smc2020 is offline  
Old 10-15-2018, 05:58 PM
  #10742  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,267
Default

Originally Posted by smc2020 View Post
Save the Top Gun jackets for the ones that .....I don't know....actually serve in the military (or have served).

Bonus points if said person was involved in active combat.
no. The military does not get a monopoly on leather jackets with fuzzy collars. If a civilian wants to look like a douche he’s free to as well.
Poser765 is offline  
Old 10-15-2018, 11:05 PM
  #10743  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,120
Default

Originally Posted by smc2020 View Post
Save the Top Gun jackets for the ones that .....I don't know....actually serve in the military (or have served).

Bonus points if said person was involved in active combat.
That's pretty lame. Most, if not all, civilian pilots back in the golden age of flying wore leather jackets with warm fuzzy liners. Because it worked. Military experience and combat had not a damned thing to do with wearing a leather jacket when flying. Any pilot who might experience weather or temperature extremes will be well prepared if they're wearing a leather flying jacket. Because that's what those jackets were designed for. Flying. Not military flying, but *flying*.

Prima donna wanna-be fighter pilots trying to tell young pilots what to wear, I tell you what...
flensr is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 05:06 AM
  #10744  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by flensr View Post
That's pretty lame. Most, if not all, civilian pilots back in the golden age of flying wore leather jackets with warm fuzzy liners. Because it worked. Military experience and combat had not a damned thing to do with wearing a leather jacket when flying. Any pilot who might experience weather or temperature extremes will be well prepared if they're wearing a leather flying jacket. Because that's what those jackets were designed for. Flying. Not military flying, but *flying*.

Prima donna wanna-be fighter pilots trying to tell young pilots what to wear, I tell you what...
The traditional brown leather flyer's jacket is issued by military aviation communities as a organizational clothing for esprit-de-corps purposes (the modern functional equivalent is a green synthetic parka jacket of very similar design).

So a modern military member wearing one (depending on time, place, and context) isn't necessarily "douchy", might just be enjoying a bit of living history that was issued to him. Same for a civilian, although wearing one with modern unit patches around an airport might hint of attempted valor theft.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 05:34 AM
  #10745  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 848
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Same for a civilian, although wearing one with modern unit patches around an airport might hint of attempted valor theft.
Meh.....I would never do it, but some civilians adorn their jackets with patches as a tribute. If the patch is something that signifies an accomplishment or milestone, I would agree with you. I still have my dad’s squadron patches and various items. I would consider sewing one of his “phantom” patches on my flight bag because the F-4 is an awesome plane and I love it (but I certainly never flew one) I would never wear one of his ribbons or sew his “400 carrier landings” patch on, because I didn’t earn it. In my mind, there’s a difference. Not trying to start a mil versus civ argument, but “thinking military stuff is cool” isn’t the same as “stolen valor”. Not to say that it’s not tacky to sport patches you had no involvement with, for sure.
PhantomHawk is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 06:23 AM
  #10746  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by PhantomHawk View Post
Meh.....I would never do it, but some civilians adorn their jackets with patches as a tribute. If the patch is something that signifies an accomplishment or milestone, I would agree with you. I still have my dad’s squadron patches and various items. I would consider sewing one of his “phantom” patches on my flight bag because the F-4 is an awesome plane and I love it (but I certainly never flew one) I would never wear one of his ribbons or sew his “400 carrier landings” patch on, because I didn’t earn it. In my mind, there’s a difference. Not trying to start a mil versus civ argument, but “thinking military stuff is cool” isn’t the same as “stolen valor”. Not to say that it’s not tacky to sport patches you had no involvement with, for sure.
Patches of historical airplanes is cool IMO. Wearing patches of current/recent in-service planes around the airport might hint at poser. Especially combined with dress, haircut, etc. One of those "know it when you see it" things.

20-something Rocker-chick with piercings wearing a jacket with an F-14 patch at the FBO: Not poser.

40- ish dude with F-35 patch, dockers, loafers, crew-cut and 'Bans: Might be a poser. Or an F-35 pilot.

These are actual real-world examples observed by me recently.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 02:53 PM
  #10747  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ItnStln's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,584
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Patches of historical airplanes is cool IMO. Wearing patches of current/recent in-service planes around the airport might hint at poser. Especially combined with dress, haircut, etc. One of those "know it when you see it" things.

20-something Rocker-chick with piercings wearing a jacket with an F-14 patch at the FBO: Not poser.

40- ish dude with F-35 patch, dockers, loafers, crew-cut and 'Bans: Might be a poser. Or an F-35 pilot.

These are actual real-world examples observed by me recently.
Do pilots still wear ‘Bans?
ItnStln is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 07:13 PM
  #10748  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,876
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Patches of historical airplanes is cool IMO. Wearing patches of current/recent in-service planes around the airport might hint at poser. Especially combined with dress, haircut, etc. One of those "know it when you see it" things.

20-something Rocker-chick with piercings wearing a jacket with an F-14 patch at the FBO: Not poser.

40- ish dude with F-35 patch, dockers, loafers, crew-cut and 'Bans: Might be a poser. Or an F-35 pilot.

These are actual real-world examples observed by me recently.
The badass F-14 pilots of yesterday rock black tennis shoes with their uniform at my shop. Time gets everyone. Maverick’s drink of choice is now metamucil.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 08:16 PM
  #10749  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 304
Default

Originally Posted by flensr View Post
Any pilot who might experience weather or temperature extremes will be well prepared if they're wearing a leather flying jacket. Because that's what those jackets were designed for. Flying.

Right. Flying. In open cockpit biplanes. The sole reason for leather was protection against the slipstream. In that era, leather was the only material that was truly windproof. Unless you're flying an open cockpit aircraft, a leather jacket is pure adornment, and not particularly practical adornment. The uniform at my airline includes an A-2 jacket. I was issued one in indoc. It's hanging in a closet. I don't think I've ever worn it other than to try it on. A leather jacket is a pain to drag around on the road, it's heavy, it doesn't fold compactly, and above all, it's not particularly warm. If you're actually experiencing the lower range of those " temperature extremes " you cite, then a leather jacket is about the last thing you'd want to have. It used to crack me up seeing the Horizon pilots wandering around on a Deadhorse turn in the winter in their leather jackets, looking completely miserable, back when Horizon was flying in Alaska.



Look, if you choose to adorn yourself with a leather jacket because of the way it looks, or the image you think it gives you, and you value decoration over practicality, that's cool, knock yourself out. But, when you try to claim that a leather jacket is some sort of practical necessity, you've crossed over into la-la land.
A Squared is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 08:40 PM
  #10750  
Line Holder
 
Lawn Boy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: 76 left
Posts: 30
Default

And I must say. I think it’s funny that some on here are defending this student pilot for his choice in flightwear. But when he shows up for his first flight as a regional FO wearing the jacket in question........
Lawn Boy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elvis90
Military
2
11-11-2010 09:25 AM
meloveboeing
Regional
5
10-02-2010 07:47 AM
kc135driver
United
119
08-24-2010 08:30 AM
exerauflyboy5
Flight Schools and Training
15
02-18-2009 08:29 PM
Busdriver
JetBlue
70
01-16-2006 10:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices