Search
Notices

NEO Perf. Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2019, 08:47 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
zippinbye's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: 320/A
Posts: 875
Default NEO Perf. Questions

Over at Delta, the 321 NEO is coming pretty soon. Our current vacancy bid brings the type to LAX, where we are told it will supplant some of the 757 flying to the islands as well as our transcons. Sounds like it has the legs to fly all the distances involved, but needs plenty of pavement to take the load to the sky ( half the tires & brakes compared to a 757 can’t help). Our rumor mill has the 321 graded unsat for west coast OGG and LIH. Otherwise, it’s supposed to become our Island airplane. That analysis comes from an organization that could not make the 73N work to HI, while Alaska and Westjet and others have made it work. As a potential bidder, I want to know if the NEO is a legit full-load ship for the likes of LAX- HNL and KOA. What do you guys think?
zippinbye is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 09:56 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 92
Default

321 guy at HAL and I’ve never been weight destructed to or from any of the islands yet. Performance wise seems to be the right aircraft. Few growing pains but what new plane doesn’t. Should be able to make it all work.
Donuthole is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 11:20 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 122
Default

Originally Posted by Donuthole View Post
321 guy at HAL and I’ve never been weight destructed to or from any of the islands yet. Performance wise seems to be the right aircraft. Few growing pains but what new plane doesn’t. Should be able to make it all work.


Or Restricted...
av8tor55 is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 11:26 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by av8tor55 View Post
Or Restricted...
I guess auto correct has done worse for me but yep you got me there.
Donuthole is offline  
Old 03-17-2019, 03:01 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Moonwolf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Sleeping
Posts: 1,036
Default

I like weight destructed better! Hey as long as the Motors don't shut down its a swell plane.
Moonwolf is offline  
Old 03-18-2019, 11:43 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: FO
Posts: 78
Default

I also fly the NEO! Never had to bump cargo , bags or people ! The airplane is great performance wise
LATIN is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 07:03 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 804
Default

Originally Posted by zippinbye View Post
Over at Delta, the 321 NEO is coming pretty soon. Our current vacancy bid brings the type to LAX, where we are told it will supplant some of the 757 flying to the islands as well as our transcons. Sounds like it has the legs to fly all the distances involved, but needs plenty of pavement to take the load to the sky ( half the tires & brakes compared to a 757 can’t help). Our rumor mill has the 321 graded unsat for west coast OGG and LIH. Otherwise, it’s supposed to become our Island airplane. That analysis comes from an organization that could not make the 73N work to HI, while Alaska and Westjet and others have made it work. As a potential bidder, I want to know if the NEO is a legit full-load ship for the likes of LAX- HNL and KOA. What do you guys think?
LAX-LIH no problem. LIH-LAX problem. A 6,500' runway does not work very well. On any given day you can make it work by taking off with fuel to get to Kona, and gassing up there. Doing this would probably blow the profit margin.

Scheduling the trip LAX-KOA-LIH-KOA-LAX works very well, with the crew L/O in either LIH or KOA.

If the company also schedules another trip SFO-KOA-OGG-KOA-SFO, with timing so that the two can swap connecting passengers in KOA in both directions, this can be quite efficient.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:22 AM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot View Post
LAX-LIH no problem. LIH-LAX problem. A 6,500' runway does not work very well. On any given day you can make it work by taking off with fuel to get to Kona, and gassing up there. Doing this would probably blow the profit margin.

Scheduling the trip LAX-KOA-LIH-KOA-LAX works very well, with the crew L/O in either LIH or KOA.

If the company also schedules another trip SFO-KOA-OGG-KOA-SFO, with timing so that the two can swap connecting passengers in KOA in both directions, this can be quite efficient.

Joe
This is not accurate for the 321NEO, however may be representative of the 321CEO.

The 321NEO has no problem with LIH to the west coast.
Southbay is offline  
Old 03-25-2019, 12:56 PM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 87
Default

What is the cabin configuration of the Hawaiian NEOs?
Sturbmaster is offline  
Old 03-25-2019, 06:00 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Speedbird2263's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by Sturbmaster View Post
What is the cabin configuration of the Hawaiian NEOs?
As per seatguru:

https://seatguru.com/airlines/Hawaii...s_A321neo.php#
Speedbird2263 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rvrabel2002
Career Questions
18
10-28-2021 12:04 PM
chrisreedrules
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-29-2012 07:27 AM
Stratapilot
Regional
685
02-21-2012 07:00 PM
cloudseer
Flight Schools and Training
2
07-12-2011 05:51 PM
Cosmik
Flight Schools and Training
9
02-08-2007 07:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices