Search
Notices

Atlas Air Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2017, 02:04 AM
  #16501  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Originally Posted by JackStraw View Post
It’s still better than Atlas, cliff.
I don't know much about Allegiant, just know one Capt there. I was just pointing out that Allegiant has their problems with recruiting, so you want to look into them in detail before going there.
atpcliff is offline  
Old 11-30-2017, 06:15 AM
  #16502  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Position: Wichita
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
I don't know much about Allegiant, just know one Capt there. I was just pointing out that Allegiant has their problems with recruiting, so you want to look into them in detail before going there.
They have problems recruiting because they are a worn out, shady junk airline that no one eagerly wants to go and work for, but my point is that they are better than Atlas.
JackStraw is offline  
Old 11-30-2017, 06:47 AM
  #16503  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by Davetastic View Post
Training as of late has been completely transformed by S.A. Classroom instruction has replaced the "teach yourself most everything" that 8 describes. It is true that during the classroom segments the "LQT" (line qualification training which covers class II and ETOPS) is only a TWO day affair but it is not difficult to plot or to check accuracy on the OFP or other equipment related elements, you just have to remember to do it.
You are speaking about the 767 training. I am referring to the 74. Yes, SA has reformed the 74 experience and it is slightly improved but the 767 training has always been much better than the 747 training ... and still is. Also, the 747 does not have a two day ETOPS training event. The difficulty the aforementioned crew had was not with plotting but with their clearance. As I heard it, it wasn't that they forgot what to do, they had simply never been trained in what to do.

Originally Posted by Davetastic View Post
Despite that during OE a new hire may only be required to make as many oceanic crossings as the check airman sees fit, it is NOT rocket science. What makes it difficult is when SHI* goes wrong!!! The LOFT training will truly demonstrate how behind you really may be if non-normal ops presents itself.
Only one crossing is required. Many OE's are done to this minimum and the particulars of crossing other oceanic areas do not get covered in the classroom or on OE.

Originally Posted by Davetastic View Post
It is contradictory to say that the CA in the aforementioned example ".....had never interviewed them...." and then say "....all of our captains do inquire....".
Obviously the captain on that flight did not ask about the crew's experience. That was the point of bringing up that example and it was only a part of the problem. The bigger part of the problem was the lack of training both in the classroom and on their OE.

Of course, the point of the example is not what you are interested in. You are more interested in disputing anything I say because we have a fundamental difference in our belief of the reality here at Atlas. I think it's bad. You think it's great. Pretty much no matter what I say, you'll disagree. That's fine - that's your prerogative. Most readers can see that the vast majority of posters on this thread feel much the same way that I do and you are in a small but annoying minority of company supporters who feel that things at Atlas are all sunshine and candy.

Don't get me wrong. I like the flying. I like the crews I fly with. What I don't like is the way Atlas treats us. Oh, I p*ss and moan about the company but probably less than most other pilots (there are far better things talk about than that). But what I don't do is try to dupe other pilots into coming to Atlas with the giggly squeals of a starry-eyed teenager. The pilots applying for a job should be informed about the reality here.

Originally Posted by Davetastic View Post
Rumors are cannon fodder and should be treated as such. Saying "one day it COULD create a disastrous incident", is just adding fuel to the union fire.
And obviously your goal is to douse the union's fire. That is clear. Again, that's your prerogative. Maybe one day, you'll be so abused by the company that your perspective will change. On the other hand, you may just end up with JC's job. Right now, it seems to be a toss-up.
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Old 11-30-2017, 03:15 PM
  #16504  
Ice-bagger
 
Davetastic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 273
Default

Originally Posted by DC8DRIVER View Post
You are speaking about the 767 training. I am referring to the 74. Yes, SA has reformed the 74 experience and it is slightly improved but the 767 training has always been much better than the 747 training ... and still is. Also, the 747 does not have a two day ETOPS training event. The difficulty the aforementioned crew had was not with plotting but with their clearance. As I heard it, it wasn't that they forgot what to do, they had simply never been trained in what to do.



Only one crossing is required. Many OE's are done to this minimum and the particulars of crossing other oceanic areas do not get covered in the classroom or on OE.



Obviously the captain on that flight did not ask about the crew's experience. That was the point of bringing up that example and it was only a part of the problem. The bigger part of the problem was the lack of training both in the classroom and on their OE.

Of course, the point of the example is not what you are interested in. You are more interested in disputing anything I say because we have a fundamental difference in our belief of the reality here at Atlas. I think it's bad. You think it's great. Pretty much no matter what I say, you'll disagree. That's fine - that's your prerogative. Most readers can see that the vast majority of posters on this thread feel much the same way that I do and you are in a small but annoying minority of company supporters who feel that things at Atlas are all sunshine and candy.

Don't get me wrong. I like the flying. I like the crews I fly with. What I don't like is the way Atlas treats us. Oh, I p*ss and moan about the company but probably less than most other pilots (there are far better things talk about than that). But what I don't do is try to dupe other pilots into coming to Atlas with the giggly squeals of a starry-eyed teenager. The pilots applying for a job should be informed about the reality here.



And obviously your goal is to douse the union's fire. That is clear. Again, that's your prerogative. Maybe one day, you'll be so abused by the company that your perspective will change. On the other hand, you may just end up with JC's job. Right now, it seems to be a toss-up.

There you go AGAIN 8......you are taking things way too personally. You are going to give yourself an aneurysm reading my posts. LMFAO.

But seriously, I did not personally attack you yet you presume to know me and what I am thinking by accusing me of being an anti-union company man. My response was purely neutral yet you conveniently left out the other half of my quote in your response. You can continue with your diatribe on what your opinion of me may be but it won't change the words that I have written on this forum.....You will not find one quote that corroborates your opinion that I am a company man, with the understanding that my quotes are taken in full context. Period. I have always dissected posts with responses shot right down the middle and I have NEVER posted any anti union opinions.

My original post was a continuation of those that had posted Q & A's both to and from prospective candidates about attitude and training. I went through initial on both the 747 and the 767 and the only discernible difference between the two was the additional day of ETOPs on the 767 IMO.

Rumors are nothing but garbage and it does nothing to advance our position with trying to secure a better contract. In my opinion, it does quite the opposite. Let me explain my theory....in the age of the internet, social media, and our ever voracious and insatiable appetite for litigation, less is more. Consequently, the more we say that may or may not have happened or that very well could happen, the more ammunition we give to our counterparts that will ultimately make it's way to an uninformed judge thereby making it harder for our union to extricate themselves and us from the tangled web of misinformation. And yet surprisingly, posters here and on other threads and FB and the multitude of other social media outlets, continue to refer to rumors as if they had happened and continue to spew an image of toxicity here.......to what end? Are we trying to keep pilots away? No one in the industry disputes that the Atlas pilots and Atlas management have a very contentious relationship but why are we intentionally or unintentionally adding to our staffing shortage? If that is the case, the problem I see is that we are keeping the potentially qualified candidates at bay and inviting the less than savory candidates (according to others on this thread) who have no other career option i.e. DUI and other things, of whom we will be stuck flying with when the dust settles!! So the net gain is what?? We get a contract sooner than later?...but we are still stuck with the dregs!!

How about this, "prospective candidates, Atlas totally sucks right now, but our union rocks and these are unprecedented times and we will get a contract to make those that choose to come here and stay a destination airline.....eventually". Instead of "everyone, stay away, this place is toxic", knowing that management will hire anyone who applies if they can't find qualified candidates(which is what is happening right now....part 91 turboprop operators and zero airline time). Personally, I'd rather fly with a guy that has options than one who doesn't.
Davetastic is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 08:52 PM
  #16505  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 83
Default

Training at Atlas is the bare minimum. They expect everything to happen online, weather during IOE or just online. There is zero training regarding oceanic crossings and the many other items you need to hop from one side of the planet to the next within a day.
Atlas experience is evaporating, being filled by people who have very little expieriwnce. Most coming from Regionals or less.
Follow that up with now having lots of hard landings, lots of minor issues that in a blink could of turned major metal in flames, atlas is a accident waiting to happen. They have been deemed a stressed carrier.
Maintenance and the company are putting pressure to keep aircraft flying. See newest injunction.
Schedulers are being forced to quit, being replaced by new ones that have zero experience. They now have to look after their own schedules to ensure you don't violate Faa rules because they will schedule you well beyond anything legal to keep aircraft flying.
Company refusing to negotiate. Don't believe the lies from HR.

If you're at atlas. Don't walk, run. IF you're lucky enough to not be at atlas, don't consider them. Your risking your ticket and your welll being.
Stratocruzr is offline  
Old 12-03-2017, 05:05 AM
  #16506  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RU4692's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Professional Monkey Trainer
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by Stratocruzr View Post
Training at Atlas is the bare minimum. They expect everything to happen online, weather during IOE or just online. There is zero training regarding oceanic crossings and the many other items you need to hop from one side of the planet to the next within a day.
Atlas experience is evaporating, being filled by people who have very little expieriwnce. Most coming from Regionals or less.
Follow that up with now having lots of hard landings, lots of minor issues that in a blink could of turned major metal in flames, atlas is a accident waiting to happen. They have been deemed a stressed carrier.
Maintenance and the company are putting pressure to keep aircraft flying. See newest injunction.
Schedulers are being forced to quit, being replaced by new ones that have zero experience. They now have to look after their own schedules to ensure you don't violate Faa rules because they will schedule you well beyond anything legal to keep aircraft flying.
Company refusing to negotiate. Don't believe the lies from HR.

If you're at atlas. Don't walk, run. IF you're lucky enough to not be at atlas, don't consider them. Your risking your ticket and your welll being.
Hummm..... Your tone of negativity and bitterness makes this hard to weigh as credible. Comes across more as a kid taking their basketball off the court because they weren't asked to play.

Have you done anything to help improve the situation at Atlas?
RU4692 is offline  
Old 12-03-2017, 09:09 AM
  #16507  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by RU4692 View Post
Hummm..... Your tone of negativity and bitterness makes this hard to weigh as credible. Comes across more as a kid taking their basketball off the court because they weren't asked to play.

Have you done anything to help improve the situation at Atlas?
If there is a difference between your statement and what a management troll would say, I can't spot it.
Crusoe is offline  
Old 12-03-2017, 09:28 AM
  #16508  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RU4692's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Professional Monkey Trainer
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by Crusoe View Post
If there is a difference between your statement and what a management troll would say, I can't spot it.
LOL- I'm no Management Troll. Trust me. I want things to improve as much as everyone else. Tired of all the whining though. The negativity just sucks the life out of you.

I'm a big fan of "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem" philosophy. Kind of had enough of all the naysayers.
RU4692 is offline  
Old 12-03-2017, 10:57 AM
  #16509  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Position: 747 F/O
Posts: 72
Default

Originally Posted by RU4692 View Post
LOL- I'm no Management Troll. Trust me. I want things to improve as much as everyone else. Tired of all the whining though. The negativity just sucks the life out of you.

I'm a big fan of "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem" philosophy. Kind of had enough of all the naysayers.
I somewhat agree with you RU4692 because its not too fun to come to work anymore, but if you think the moral/negativity is bad right now, we aren't even at rock bottom yet. It's got to get far worse and to the point where it strongly affects group decisions. Study the history of different pilot groups of where they've been and where their CBA's are now. Look at moral and naysaying specifically. UPS and UAL come to mind. You've got to hit rock bottom and right now the metal is still moving because things aren't bad enough yet. Prepare to be disappointed...again.
CaptainHvac is offline  
Old 12-03-2017, 12:03 PM
  #16510  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by RU4692 View Post
LOL- I'm no Management Troll. Trust me. I want things to improve as much as everyone else. Tired of all the whining though. The negativity just sucks the life out of you.

I'm a big fan of "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem" philosophy. Kind of had enough of all the naysayers.

Are you an Atlas pilot?
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AAL763
Atlas/Polar
112
12-10-2016 04:13 PM
ProceedOnCourse
Hiring News
23
08-16-2009 06:40 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 07:19 PM
astropilot92571
Hiring News
4
04-26-2005 08:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices