Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Hiring News
Still convinced there's no pilot shortage? >

Still convinced there's no pilot shortage?

Notices
Hiring News Latest news and rumors

Still convinced there's no pilot shortage?

Old 11-22-2016, 05:49 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Scraggly Heron View Post
Pilots spend thousands of dollars on interview preparation and resume reviews. The legacy airlines spend nothing on recruiting pilots, because they don't have to. Regional airlines still have pilots flying for them despite pay that's on par with brewing coffee for Starbucks.

So yes, I'm still convinced that there's no pilot shortage.
Of course there is a shortage, but the shortage is on the low (less-experienced) end of the labor market. There are simply not enough pilots to fly all of the flights that the market needs flown.

Regionals have raised pay considerably, and it still isn't fixing the problem. Even if they started FOs at $150k/yr there would not be enough pilots in the next few years to fill the slots.

There is a big buffer that is empty, and it is going to get a lot worse. To fix it:

- pay needs to increase (currently in progress)
- the 1500 hour rule needs to be reduced or eliminated
- the mandatory retirement age needs to be raised or eliminated
- cost of training needs to decrease

Any one of those coming in to reality will not solve the problem, all of them have to happen in order for the pilot shortage to meet levels of demand
NMuir is offline  
Old 11-22-2016, 05:50 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies View Post
Can you explain?
What regulatory burden?
Many of the rules that are not safety related, and even some of the indirect that are.
NMuir is offline  
Old 11-22-2016, 05:53 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Barriers to entry helps drive wages up.
Artificially. But they also create shortages, as seen here.




Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Allowing 250 hr commercial pilots not the right seat of a regional helps keep wages low.
Maybe, it depends on how supply and demand.

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Also - if 1500 is arbitrary - what is your plan for setting a better standard or are you one who likes to complain about things but has no answer?
The way it was seemed to work ok. Or perhaps some sort of merit/skills based test at 500 hrs. Dunno really, but the more regulation the government piles on, the worse it gets.

Eventually profits will decrease and/or ticket prices will increase and we'll start to see some elasticity of demand due to higher prices.
NMuir is offline  
Old 11-22-2016, 06:11 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,276
Default

Originally Posted by NMuir View Post
The way it was seemed to work ok.
Um.. no it didn't. I'm going out on a limb and assume that you are one of the people who think the 1500 hour rule "hurt" your career. If that is the case, then I can understand your frustration, but history has proven that regionals will hire any one when they need to and a 250 hour pilot will pay to be an FO in an RJ. You just haven't been around long enough to see companies compromise safety to make a buck or a new pilot throw another pilot under the bus just to get ahead.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 11-22-2016, 06:19 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,276
Default

Originally Posted by NMuir View Post
Or perhaps some sort of merit/skills based test at 500 hrs.
That would be a waste. I have probably only met 1 pilot who was good enough to be an effective FO at 500 hours. I have plenty of experince as an FO, captain, airline pilot, charter pilot, and current CFI. Trust me, even the best 1500 pilot still has a lot to learn when the start flying a jet professionally. They might do a great job 99.999% of the time. but that 0.001% of the time, their lack of acutal experince will affect safety.

I have even seen someone's career ruined becuase he assumed that meeting the minimum flight time for upgrade was the same as being qualifed. If he had delayed that upgrade by 6 months he would have had the oppurtunity to have an experinced captain teach him an important lesson before he started flying with new FOs.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 11-22-2016, 08:16 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Admiral
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Muir -
Allowing 250 hr commercial pilots not the right seat of a regional helps keep wages low
Originally Posted by NMuir View Post
Artificially. But they also create shortages, as seen here.
One could argue that the major airlines caused artificially low wages by whipshawing regionals against each other. Which in turn created a vacuum within the pilot pipe line. Which is now finally starting to self correct itself.

Using the 1500 hr rule really is a weak argument. Looking at the history within the industry, the 400 hr FO was just a blip on the radar. In the past, pilots needed well over 1500 hrs just to be considered at the regional level.
Flyhayes is offline  
Old 11-22-2016, 10:44 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 62
Default

The second there is a REAL pilot shortage, the airlines will push through the Multi-Crew Pilot license. (or whatever it was called)

In the mean time, keep dreaming.
AgentSmith is offline  
Old 11-23-2016, 02:02 AM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by NMuir View Post
A 4-year government college is going to be about $35k for tuition, probably another $10k for books and misc, and then living expenses ??$.

Flight training to get all one's tickets is around $60-90k including gear and check rides.

So $175k for a 4 year degree, plus flight training is not unrealistic. Granted the more one works while they are in training and college, the lower the number, but it is essentially impossible to do both these days for less than $140k without help (scholarships, angel donors, etc).

This is not even an aviation degree.


Getting a degree in aviation is a different ballgame all together (UND/Riddle/MTSU, etc).
If you spent $60-90K to get your ratings you got screwed!
Stihlsaw is offline  
Old 11-23-2016, 04:20 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,276
Default

Originally Posted by Stihlsaw View Post
If you spent $60-90K to get your ratings you got screwed!
That is a realistic cost these days. I constructed a bare bones syllabus to go from private to CFI in mostly a 152 and the price is $30,000 (and that is without the cost of the CFI).
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 11-23-2016, 04:54 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
That is a realistic cost these days. I constructed a bare bones syllabus to go from private to CFI in mostly a 152 and the price is $30,000 (and that is without the cost of the CFI).
Get **** out of here?!?! Really?? I did my private for less than $3000 in the early 90's Did the Instrument for around $14-1500? Did my COMM in less than a week!

Now I have to admit I did the PPL and then just flew for fun for a while before I decided to pursue a career so I had some TT built up

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 11-27-2016 at 02:51 AM. Reason: TOU
Stihlsaw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Opus
Major
46
04-04-2008 09:47 PM
Oldfreightdawg
Major
1
03-03-2008 06:43 PM
jelloy683
Major
9
08-03-2007 01:05 PM
jelloy683
Regional
3
08-02-2007 04:03 PM
aerospacepilot
Regional
59
07-01-2007 04:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices