Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums - Find your next job as a Pilot > > >
Horizon Air Regional Airline
 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-27-2018, 10:31 PM   #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 265
Default Props affecting pilot career progression??

Is the career progression (success in being hired at legacy/major airlines) of Q400 pilots adversely affected by the fact that theyve flown turboprops, rather than jets? Or do QXs Q400 pilots advance similarly to their peers (ie, other regionals & QX E175 pilots) who fly RJs?

Understood that QX is transitioning to E175s (and retiring the Q400s), but this seems to be occurring on a timeline thats TBD and has already had some unforeseen challenges affect the transition.
fenix1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 11:17 PM   #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
snackysmores's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: fatigued
Posts: 1,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenix1 View Post
Is the career progression (success in being hired at legacy/major airlines) of Q400 pilots adversely affected by the fact that theyve flown turboprops, rather than jets? Or do QXs Q400 pilots advance similarly to their peers (ie, other regionals & QX E175 pilots) who fly RJs?

Understood that QX is transitioning to E175s (and retiring the Q400s), but this seems to be occurring on a timeline thats TBD and has already had some unforeseen challenges affect the transition.
We've had a bunch of people go to Delta, SWA, etc.

121 is 121. Alaska has hired a bunch of Lakers in the past too flying 1900s. It doesn't matter.
snackysmores is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 06:54 AM   #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,083
Default

The difficulty in choosing Horizon for the new guy is that if you go to the Q400 you will be flying an aircraft that is being phased out of the inventory, meaning you may be looking at short term future domicile and aircraft change and in the interim having to take the leavings as more and more of the longer routes go to the jet.

But if you go to the jet, every Q400 they do retire will shove about seven more FOs ahead of you in the bidding seniority for the lines available.

If the transition goes smoothly the extra extra e-jet flying that comes with the new aircraft ought to make that somewhat of a wash, but little of the process has gone all that smoothly thus far, IMHO anyway.

And the outsourcing of Horizon flying to Skywest is worrisome to say the least.
Excargodog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 08:09 AM   #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 22,417
Default

I found that prop 121 time alone was not enough, except for SWA. I observed after the brasilia retired at SKW, within one year former bro CAs were leaving in droves once they got a jet type and a few hundred hours to go with their years of prop experience.

There is more training risk for prop drivers going to an advanced jet. Although the Q is a lot more sophisticated than a bro.

Prop time is not wasted, all or almost all of the people in my legacy class had both prop and jet time. But I would have a plan to get jet time in your hip pocket if you're in a hurry.

If you're not in a hurry, they should be hiring everybody in five years.
rickair7777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 12:42 PM   #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 265
Default

Is there strong potential for Horizon to alter their domiciles (close and/or open) based solely on the transition from Q400's to E175's? It seems like the significant difference in performance between equipment could easily drive changes to the route structures or, at the least, schedules for pilots.

Is the outsourcing of flying to OO from QX indicative of real trouble for QX? (Would AS ever simply cut bait and sell them???) Or is this outsourcing simply a temporary solution to a near-term problem that QX can eventually solve & take back the 175 flying from OO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
The difficulty in choosing Horizon for the new guy is that if you go to the Q400 you will be flying an aircraft that is being phased out of the inventory, meaning you may be looking at short term future domicile and aircraft change and in the interim having to take the leavings as more and more of the longer routes go to the jet.

But if you go to the jet, every Q400 they do retire will shove about seven more FOs ahead of you in the bidding seniority for the lines available.

If the transition goes smoothly the extra extra e-jet flying that comes with the new aircraft ought to make that somewhat of a wash, but little of the process has gone all that smoothly thus far, IMHO anyway.

And the outsourcing of Horizon flying to Skywest is worrisome to say the least.
fenix1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 01:20 PM   #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenix1 View Post
Is there strong potential for Horizon to alter their domiciles (close and/or open) based solely on the transition from Q400's to E175's? It seems like the significant difference in performance between equipment could easily drive changes to the route structures or, at the least, schedules for pilots.

Is the outsourcing of flying to OO from QX indicative of real trouble for QX? (Would AS ever simply cut bait and sell them???) Or is this outsourcing simply a temporary solution to a near-term problem that QX can eventually solve & take back the 175 flying from OO?
Its a 12-15 year contract. And OO owns the aircraft. So unless they want to spend billions on new aircraft and get put of the contract some how, not going to happen. Bigger fish to fry. VX...
amcnd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 01:24 PM   #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: Captain
Posts: 238
Default

I would say does not matter. Look at the Jetstream 31, EMB-110 "Bandit", steam gage Metroliners, etc.

all those dudes paved the way to airlines before
BarrySeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 02:25 PM   #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 265
Default

Is this still true today, when almost 100% of regional 121 flying is done by jets?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarrySeal View Post
I would say does not matter. Look at the Jetstream 31, EMB-110 "Bandit", steam gage Metroliners, etc.

all those dudes paved the way to airlines before
fenix1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 02:29 PM   #9  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 265
Default

The AS/OO agreement is a 12-15 year agreement? QX is already in contract to take on 30 E175's (with options for 30-ish more), right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
Its a 12-15 year contract. And OO owns the aircraft. So unless they want to spend billions on new aircraft and get put of the contract some how, not going to happen. Bigger fish to fry. VX...
fenix1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 03:18 PM   #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 22,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarrySeal View Post
I would say does not matter. Look at the Jetstream 31, EMB-110 "Bandit", steam gage Metroliners, etc.

all those dudes paved the way to airlines before
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenix1 View Post
Is this still true today, when almost 100% of regional 121 flying is done by jets?
That's the problem. In the past majors hired prop pilots from commuters because that's all that was available on the 121 side.

Today there's so many jet pilots, who are less of a training risk. Jet time and multiple types help... a lot. The problem with single types is you might be a one trick pony, especially if you've been flying the same plane for 10+ years. It's not really a "rule", more of a trend.
rickair7777 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Seniority progression at Delta vs SWA FLY6584 Delta 64 08-18-2016 03:24 PM
considering career change mfdffp Career Questions 6 10-27-2015 10:57 AM
Pilot career ryane946 Major 47 03-26-2006 09:00 AM
SJS - The Career Killer (tv spot) mike734 Regional 72 02-27-2006 09:51 AM
Pilot career ryane946 Regional 15 02-16-2006 05:03 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:51 AM.


vBulletin® v3.9.3.5, Copyright ©2000-2019, MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright 2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1