How does coronavirus affect QX?
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 370
hoping this will go away fast
#23
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: smoke and spider season
Posts: 93
They really need to bite the bullet and put pay differential beyond the 4.2 rig to get more demand for the Q positions, although that was before C19 blew everything up...
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: B777, Right Side or Panda-side. Or Pandacide.
Posts: 119
Yeah I was surprised as well, although they have been tap-dancing around how we are short on 175 CAs trying to drive upgrades to the Q and more than they anticipated said 'pass' when offered a Q CA slot.
They really need to bite the bullet and put pay differential beyond the 4.2 rig to get more demand for the Q positions, although that was before C19 blew everything up...
They really need to bite the bullet and put pay differential beyond the 4.2 rig to get more demand for the Q positions, although that was before C19 blew everything up...
This is an honest question, please help me understand your point.
Bill's "all pilots" email was definitely a surprise. And the virus is obviously a wild card, but later or much later things will be back to "normal"...
#25
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: smoke and spider season
Posts: 93
Can you expand on your comments about pay differential? When I do a quick scan of bid results it looks like the credit hours are about the same, with inefficiencies/long sits/short stages for both fleets. Though less block on the Q is undeniable...
This is an honest question, please help me understand your point.
Bill's "all pilots" email was definitely a surprise. And the virus is obviously a wild card, but later or much later things will be back to "normal"...
This is an honest question, please help me understand your point.
Bill's "all pilots" email was definitely a surprise. And the virus is obviously a wild card, but later or much later things will be back to "normal"...
More legs on average per day (pre-C19).
Less integrated systems.
Lower altitude ceilings, requiring more weather SA/avoidance.
More legs into SEA, which was a zoo pre-C19.
No one else flies the Q in the US for pax ops so its also a "dead" type rating should QX suddenly cease operations (meteorite to HQ) and you have to find work somewhere else.
Yet we all get paid the same per hour. That's why no one is jumping at the chance to upgrade into the Q IMHO.
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
If we actually used logic to determine pay (hah), the Q would be paid more/hr because lets be honest here, its more work and higher workload than the jet hands down.
More legs on average per day (pre-C19).
Less integrated systems.
Lower altitude ceilings, requiring more weather SA/avoidance.
More legs into SEA, which was a zoo pre-C19.
No one else flies the Q in the US for pax ops so its also a "dead" type rating should QX suddenly cease operations (meteorite to HQ) and you have to find work somewhere else.
Yet we all get paid the same per hour. That's why no one is jumping at the chance to upgrade into the Q IMHO.
More legs on average per day (pre-C19).
Less integrated systems.
Lower altitude ceilings, requiring more weather SA/avoidance.
More legs into SEA, which was a zoo pre-C19.
No one else flies the Q in the US for pax ops so its also a "dead" type rating should QX suddenly cease operations (meteorite to HQ) and you have to find work somewhere else.
Yet we all get paid the same per hour. That's why no one is jumping at the chance to upgrade into the Q IMHO.
Also, the Q pays 0.5% less as of December 2019. The gap increases by 0.5% every year until December 2023 (the Q will pay 2.5% less by then).
...should QX suddenly cease operations (meteorite to HQ)...
https://sweetmeteorofdeath.com/
#29
The "last time"? When was the last time AS parked 152 airplanes all at once for an undetermined amount of time? not including the very temporary complete shutdown after 911, even then, did we even have a 152 total airplanes?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post