Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Horizon Air
How does coronavirus affect QX? >

How does coronavirus affect QX?

Search
Notices
Horizon Air Regional Airline

How does coronavirus affect QX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2020, 04:51 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 370
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike View Post
For perspective, at Alaska Airlines we will have 152 airplanes parked by April 15th. We will be left operating 87 airplanes...The last time this went down Horizon was not flying any jets for us and Skywest was operating a few CRJ 700’s for us....
very bad news for everyone on the alaska tail, sad times.

hoping this will go away fast
Turboprop is offline  
Old 04-02-2020, 10:43 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
BigfatQ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 74
Default

Looks like we're upgrading 12 ppl maybe? Very surprising to get that email
BigfatQ is offline  
Old 04-02-2020, 11:55 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: smoke and spider season
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by BigfatQ View Post
Looks like we're upgrading 12 ppl maybe? Very surprising to get that email
Yeah I was surprised as well, although they have been tap-dancing around how we are short on 175 CAs trying to drive upgrades to the Q and more than they anticipated said 'pass' when offered a Q CA slot.

They really need to bite the bullet and put pay differential beyond the 4.2 rig to get more demand for the Q positions, although that was before C19 blew everything up...
PetRock is offline  
Old 04-03-2020, 07:51 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Stinger6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: B777, Right Side or Panda-side. Or Pandacide.
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by PetRock View Post
Yeah I was surprised as well, although they have been tap-dancing around how we are short on 175 CAs trying to drive upgrades to the Q and more than they anticipated said 'pass' when offered a Q CA slot.

They really need to bite the bullet and put pay differential beyond the 4.2 rig to get more demand for the Q positions, although that was before C19 blew everything up...
Can you expand on your comments about pay differential? When I do a quick scan of bid results it looks like the credit hours are about the same, with inefficiencies/long sits/short stages for both fleets. Though less block on the Q is undeniable...

This is an honest question, please help me understand your point.

Bill's "all pilots" email was definitely a surprise. And the virus is obviously a wild card, but later or much later things will be back to "normal"...
Stinger6 is offline  
Old 04-03-2020, 10:28 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: smoke and spider season
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by Stinger6 View Post
Can you expand on your comments about pay differential? When I do a quick scan of bid results it looks like the credit hours are about the same, with inefficiencies/long sits/short stages for both fleets. Though less block on the Q is undeniable...

This is an honest question, please help me understand your point.

Bill's "all pilots" email was definitely a surprise. And the virus is obviously a wild card, but later or much later things will be back to "normal"...
If we actually used logic to determine pay (hah), the Q would be paid more/hr because lets be honest here, its more work and higher workload than the jet hands down.

More legs on average per day (pre-C19).

Less integrated systems.

Lower altitude ceilings, requiring more weather SA/avoidance.

More legs into SEA, which was a zoo pre-C19.

No one else flies the Q in the US for pax ops so its also a "dead" type rating should QX suddenly cease operations (meteorite to HQ) and you have to find work somewhere else.

Yet we all get paid the same per hour. That's why no one is jumping at the chance to upgrade into the Q IMHO.
PetRock is offline  
Old 04-03-2020, 12:04 PM
  #26  
Anson Harris
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by PetRock View Post
If we actually used logic to determine pay (hah), the Q would be paid more/hr because lets be honest here, its more work and higher workload than the jet hands down.

More legs on average per day (pre-C19).

Less integrated systems.

Lower altitude ceilings, requiring more weather SA/avoidance.

More legs into SEA, which was a zoo pre-C19.

No one else flies the Q in the US for pax ops so its also a "dead" type rating should QX suddenly cease operations (meteorite to HQ) and you have to find work somewhere else.

Yet we all get paid the same per hour. That's why no one is jumping at the chance to upgrade into the Q IMHO.
Yeah, but it's your quickest route to upgrade and then on to Alaska. Oh, wait... dang it!

Also, the Q pays 0.5% less as of December 2019. The gap increases by 0.5% every year until December 2023 (the Q will pay 2.5% less by then).

...should QX suddenly cease operations (meteorite to HQ)...
SMOD 2020!!!
https://sweetmeteorofdeath.com/
 
Old 04-03-2020, 01:12 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 459
Default

Was the idea that the jet and the Q would be interchangeable on routes, so the jet needed a little more pay to make up for the extra speed? Because that's dumb as hell.
hydrostream is offline  
Old 04-03-2020, 01:45 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
BigfatQ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 74
Default

The easier your flying the more you get payed. Simple economics
BigfatQ is offline  
Old 04-04-2020, 02:32 PM
  #29  
In the dumpster fire
 
SIUav8er's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike View Post
For perspective, at Alaska Airlines we will have 152 airplanes parked by April 15th. We will be left operating 87 airplanes...The last time this went down Horizon was not flying any jets for us and Skywest was operating a few CRJ 700’s for us....
The "last time"? When was the last time AS parked 152 airplanes all at once for an undetermined amount of time? not including the very temporary complete shutdown after 911, even then, did we even have a 152 total airplanes?
SIUav8er is offline  
Old 04-05-2020, 12:32 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 42
Default

Is it wrong to assume furloughs are not a matter of if but when? I can't see how any airline can operate like this. Even with the govt bailout. Which has some pretty ridiculous stipulations as of now.
AirplanesRkewl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Excargodog
Union Talk
12
04-15-2020 01:08 PM
Roccosiffredi
United
1
03-11-2020 01:50 PM
Pivotman
United
6
03-07-2020 01:49 PM
The Hellion
United
6
01-31-2020 05:27 PM
ATPFlyer
Fractional
4
05-21-2006 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices