Horizon Air SIC to Alaska Air SIC, how?
#1
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 690
Horizon Air SIC to Alaska Air SIC, how?
I have heard that Alaska will lower their minimums to Horizon air FO's if they have 2000 SIC with Horizon. I have a hard time believing this since Alaska would have to train two people for 1 pilot slot.
They would have to invest in the Horizon pilot to get him/her training at Alaska. In addition, they would have to invest in training a new Horizon pilot.
My question is: Will Alaska eat their own young despite the above comment?
Am I better off going to a carrier with quick upgrade and get my PIC time? (Republic, Skywest, Jetblue, Compass) Or get my 2000 SIC at Horizon and finally get based in SEA and have QOL? Thanks!
They would have to invest in the Horizon pilot to get him/her training at Alaska. In addition, they would have to invest in training a new Horizon pilot.
My question is: Will Alaska eat their own young despite the above comment?
Am I better off going to a carrier with quick upgrade and get my PIC time? (Republic, Skywest, Jetblue, Compass) Or get my 2000 SIC at Horizon and finally get based in SEA and have QOL? Thanks!
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 133
I have heard that Alaska will lower their minimums to Horizon air FO's if they have 2000 SIC with Horizon. I have a hard time believing this since Alaska would have to train two people for 1 pilot slot.
They would have to invest in the Horizon pilot to get him/her training at Alaska. In addition, they would have to invest in training a new Horizon pilot.
My question is: Will Alaska eat their own young despite the above comment?
Am I better off going to a carrier with quick upgrade and get my PIC time? (Republic, Skywest, Jetblue, Compass) Or get my 2000 SIC at Horizon and finally get based in SEA and have QOL? Thanks!
They would have to invest in the Horizon pilot to get him/her training at Alaska. In addition, they would have to invest in training a new Horizon pilot.
My question is: Will Alaska eat their own young despite the above comment?
Am I better off going to a carrier with quick upgrade and get my PIC time? (Republic, Skywest, Jetblue, Compass) Or get my 2000 SIC at Horizon and finally get based in SEA and have QOL? Thanks!
#3
I have heard that Alaska will lower their minimums to Horizon air FO's if they have 2000 SIC with Horizon. I have a hard time believing this since Alaska would have to train two people for 1 pilot slot.
They would have to invest in the Horizon pilot to get him/her training at Alaska. In addition, they would have to invest in training a new Horizon pilot.
My question is: Will Alaska eat their own young despite the above comment?
Am I better off going to a carrier with quick upgrade and get my PIC time? (Republic, Skywest, Jetblue, Compass) Or get my 2000 SIC at Horizon and finally get based in SEA and have QOL? Thanks!
They would have to invest in the Horizon pilot to get him/her training at Alaska. In addition, they would have to invest in training a new Horizon pilot.
My question is: Will Alaska eat their own young despite the above comment?
Am I better off going to a carrier with quick upgrade and get my PIC time? (Republic, Skywest, Jetblue, Compass) Or get my 2000 SIC at Horizon and finally get based in SEA and have QOL? Thanks!
Better to wait for some responses of pilots who are currently working there as I don't start until next month.
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 951
I heard that one reason Alaska does this is because they have a lot of FOs leave after the 1st year. If they hire SICs who don't meet the PIC requirement for other majors, perhaps they'll be less likely to leave. Dunno if it's true, just what somebody told me. I suppose it makes sense if FO attrition is really a problem.
If you're interested in applying at regionals, I'd recommend applying to companies that you'd enjoy working with for 5+ years. I personally suspect that the "quick upgrade" of which you speak is gone and not coming back for a while. (Like the above poster, I'm not sure what JetBlue is doing on your list of "fast-upgrade regionals.")
If you absolutely must be based in Seattle in the future, the Horizon-Alaska route might be a good one. But everything must fall perfectly in place for this to happen: 1) get hired at Horizon, 2) be lucky enough for the 2000 hours SIC window to still be open in a couple of years, 3) be lucky enough for Alaska to be hiring in a couple of years, and 4) get hired at Alaska. And then I'm guessing you'll be based in Anchorage until you have the seniority for Seattle.
Anybody from Alaska Air Group please chime in and let me know how far off the mark I am.
If you're interested in applying at regionals, I'd recommend applying to companies that you'd enjoy working with for 5+ years. I personally suspect that the "quick upgrade" of which you speak is gone and not coming back for a while. (Like the above poster, I'm not sure what JetBlue is doing on your list of "fast-upgrade regionals.")
If you absolutely must be based in Seattle in the future, the Horizon-Alaska route might be a good one. But everything must fall perfectly in place for this to happen: 1) get hired at Horizon, 2) be lucky enough for the 2000 hours SIC window to still be open in a couple of years, 3) be lucky enough for Alaska to be hiring in a couple of years, and 4) get hired at Alaska. And then I'm guessing you'll be based in Anchorage until you have the seniority for Seattle.
Anybody from Alaska Air Group please chime in and let me know how far off the mark I am.
#7
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 690
Alaska air, not the state. They seem to be healthy! And puts me back in SEA, or SEA after a year in ANC. Mostly because they pay well and their healthy, and QOL in SEA where I grew up. Everyone has their opinions. Why you knocking Alaska?
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Sitting down and facing front. Why would you want to know that?
Posts: 536
From what I hear, and take it with a grain of salt, it does happen, but not very often. Don't bank on going to Alaska after flying for Horizon for three years. If Alaska is your ultimate goal, Horizon probably isn't the best way to get there.
#9
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Q400
Posts: 32
There have been quite a few FOs go from horizon to alaska in the last few months but there probably wont be any for a while Alaska wont hire for the rest of the year.
#10
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 77
As one of the many FOs that bailed from QX last year, I can tell you so far so good. Considering that the RJ's are going away (it's just a matter of time and if you work at QX you know what I'm talking about) the fleet further reducing it's size, as a result, having to deal with grumpy captains who had to take a paycut from RJ pay to 400 pay, and not to mention age 65 which would have kept me in the right seat of a dash 8 in terms of forever (careerwise), I'm so glad I got out when I did. It'll only take me a coule of years to make up my paycut where a captain it'll take him at least 10. Make more money over the course of my career because I didn't sit as long in the right seat of the dash? And be based in Seattle? What's not to like? Anchorage samkorage. Pack a thick coat. You'll be fine you wussies.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post