AIP.
#11
The REAL Bluedriver
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,879
There are some good things, for sure. There are also some things I don't think I can agree to. I'll read the whole thing first, of course and weigh it all on balance.
But today's profit sharing plan???? Are you KIDDING me?
#12
The contract will support the Bullet points. The language won't change a 2% raise or improve upon TODAYS shat profit sharing plan.
There are some good things, for sure. There are also some things I don't think I can agree to. I'll read the whole thing first, of course and weigh it all on balance.
But today's profit sharing plan???? Are you KIDDING me?
There are some good things, for sure. There are also some things I don't think I can agree to. I'll read the whole thing first, of course and weigh it all on balance.
But today's profit sharing plan???? Are you KIDDING me?
I see lots of improvements that we needed. I still need to see the full TA to make my decision. It looks like one thing we had to compromise on was profit sharing. I am not happy about that, but this needs to be a FULL TA vote, period. The new Vacation/PTO language is another that I need to see. I am happy with the rates, scope, and 5 hour day rig.
Oh, and window or aisle seat for deadheads?? I really hope we did not give up something for that.
Overall, I think the NC did a great job and I can't wait to see the FULL TA to come to my decision and vote accordingly.
#13
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 320, L
Posts: 38
I agree with you here.
I see lots of improvements that we needed. I still need to see the full TA to make my decision. It looks like one thing we had to compromise on was profit sharing. I am not happy about that, but this needs to be a FULL TA vote, period. The new Vacation/PTO language is another that I need to see. I am happy with the rates, scope, and 5 hour day rig.
Oh, and window or aisle seat for deadheads?? I really hope we did not give up something for that.
Overall, I think the NC did a great job and I can't wait to see the FULL TA to come to my decision and vote accordingly.
I see lots of improvements that we needed. I still need to see the full TA to make my decision. It looks like one thing we had to compromise on was profit sharing. I am not happy about that, but this needs to be a FULL TA vote, period. The new Vacation/PTO language is another that I need to see. I am happy with the rates, scope, and 5 hour day rig.
Oh, and window or aisle seat for deadheads?? I really hope we did not give up something for that.
Overall, I think the NC did a great job and I can't wait to see the FULL TA to come to my decision and vote accordingly.
Overall, I’m underwhelmed.
#14
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
#15
The REAL Bluedriver
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,879
#17
You guys on here are truely entertaining! LOL. They have only released bullet points! Cost neutral? How can you determine that with bullet points? I am just glad I can make my own decision based on the road shows and the full language. I truely hope everyone does that. It most certainly will not be based on what anyone says on a forum! LOL, thanks for the entertainment tho, it’s nice!
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 355
These are bulletpoint with a whole lot of missing language. Love how the people on this forum demand information just a few days ago, then when they get it they then interpret it how they see fit before seeing the full contract.
I'm not blown away by the bullet points, but I'm not totally disappointed either. Again, I'll wait until the full language is out to decide whether it's worth a Yes or No vote.
I'm not blown away by the bullet points, but I'm not totally disappointed either. Again, I'll wait until the full language is out to decide whether it's worth a Yes or No vote.
#20
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post