Search

Notices

AIP.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2018 | 10:56 AM
  #701  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 12
Default

Don’t worry about scope. We’re gonna focus on culture. Priority 1! Then we’re gonna celebrate operational wins. Priority 2. Meanwhile DAL is basically buying LAX. I bet the BOD is thrilled with that email
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 12:02 PM
  #702  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Your “industry leading” scope is because JB is not a network carrier. JB is a point to point carrier. Same with SW. Neither airline feeds a network. You just serve cities. Massive network carriers like American, Delta, United, etc all need feed from smaller cities that mainline aircraft can’t economically fly to. JB doesn’t fly to Bismark, Minot, Grand Forks, Lubbock, El Paso, etc because it doesn’t make financial sense to do it in an A-320. So some 50 seat jet flys in there and brings those passengers to ORD, DEN, DFW, ATL, etc and mainline flies them to Europe, etc. Scope sounds like something the company had no problem agreeing to because they didn’t intend to fly to those smaller cities anyway. If they did, you’d probably be able to grow much faster. Express carriers are a double-edged sword. You don’t want them, but you need them and they can be very good for you.

Don’t accept substandard wages because you think you got a scope win. Its going to be a very long wait for your next contract, and if that happens in a downturn, you’ll be stuck there for years. That’s what happened to us at Continental.
Jetblue doesn't have the global network that the Legacies have, but that wouldn't stop them from trying to fly some of those E190 routes with about a dozen or so E175's from Republic if they could do it. Boston to PIT, LGA, RDU, SYR, PHL, BUF.... would be very seemless on a regional-flown E175. Heck they could even hide their abysmal OTP on routes like JFK-BTV on their regional partners.

What size was AirTran in 2002 when they partnered with Air Wisconsin to start AirTran JetConnect? In the end it only lasted a couple years, but it goes to show that if it makes business sense and Scope allows it...they'll try it.
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 01:42 PM
  #703  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
Jetblue doesn't have the global network that the Legacies have, but that wouldn't stop them from trying to fly some of those E190 routes with about a dozen or so E175's from Republic if they could do it. Boston to PIT, LGA, RDU, SYR, PHL, BUF.... would be very seemless on a regional-flown E175. Heck they could even hide their abysmal OTP on routes like JFK-BTV on their regional partners.

What size was AirTran in 2002 when they partnered with Air Wisconsin to start AirTran JetConnect? In the end it only lasted a couple years, but it goes to show that if it makes business sense and Scope allows it...they'll try it.
If they wanted to do that they wouldn’t have offered you scope preventing that. Maybe that’s just the threat they need to get you to accept long-term below industry standard wages. Its a magic act. They show you the scope with one hand and with the other hand they reach into your pocket and take your wages.
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 02:37 PM
  #704  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
If they wanted to do that they wouldn’t have offered you scope preventing that. Maybe that’s just the threat they need to get you to accept long-term below industry standard wages. Its a magic act. They show you the scope with one hand and with the other hand they reach into your pocket and take your wages.
Which is why none of us should ever accept the false arguments that make you trade X for Y. Our stance NEEDS to be X AND Y + strike. Anything less is our surrender without BJ firing a shot.

Only a prolonged strike can reveal the truth of what is possible.

This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 03:15 PM
  #705  
Bozo the pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
If they wanted to do that they wouldn’t have offered you scope preventing that. Maybe that’s just the threat they need to get you to accept long-term below industry standard wages. Its a magic act. They show you the scope with one hand and with the other hand they reach into your pocket and take your wages.
Very possible- Btw is the UAL thread that boring? You seem to post a ton on this board- thought you were above all of this LCC stuff
What else can you tell us about this T/A? Oh yea...
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 04:15 PM
  #706  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot
Very possible- Btw is the UAL thread that boring? You seem to post a ton on this board- thought you were above all of this LCC stuff
What else can you tell us about this T/A? Oh yea...
He is (rightfully) concerned that people like you will drag down the profession and start another race to the bottom (thus impacting him).
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 06:10 PM
  #707  
Bozo the pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas
He is (rightfully) concerned that people like you will drag down the profession and start another race to the bottom (thus impacting him).
People like me- You mean undecided? How dare I.
I should just vote no now right? gmafb
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 06:14 PM
  #708  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot
People like me- You mean undecided? How dare I.
I should just vote no now right? gmafb
We would need work rules that far surpass DAL for those crappy pay rates to be OK.
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 06:27 PM
  #709  
Bozo the pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas
We would need work rules that far surpass DAL for those crappy pay rates to be OK.
Agreed on the rates but Ill go ahead see what the NC worked out.
What rates would you have liked -serious question.
I would've liked to mid-260s.
Not the most important aspect of a contract though.
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 07:11 PM
  #710  
todd1200's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
If they wanted to do that they wouldn’t have offered you scope preventing that. Maybe that’s just the threat they need to get you to accept long-term below industry standard wages. Its a magic act. They show you the scope with one hand and with the other hand they reach into your pocket and take your wages.
Textbook circular reasoning. If that’s the case why even have a scope section?

Does Alaska have widebodies? Does Horizon fly Alaska pax? RJ scope is just for big boys and RJs are good because they make a worldwide network possible? So if our scope allows JB to sell tickets on Jetsuite ERJs and we get UA+__% payrates you’ll be on here congratulating us for “raising the bar” since RJ scope doesn’t matter without widebodies?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NavyFlyer
Delta
195
09-03-2016 11:31 AM
Free Flyer
Major
13
12-06-2015 07:37 PM
JohnGardner
Regional
44
02-11-2014 06:50 PM
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices