JB realistic London expansion
#301
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
They operate BOS (business+leisure) and JFK (primarily leisure) with two different missions.
#302
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 244
They’ve always maintained they have different strategies for different focus cities. Boston is mainly buisness focused, JfK is mainly leisure and VFR focused. There’s no way you’ll compete against hourly service to DFW out of LgA with one or 2 daily out of jfk. For that matter I don’t know why we bother serving ATL from JFK.
#303
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
They’ve always maintained they have different strategies for different focus cities. Boston is mainly buisness focused, JfK is mainly leisure and VFR focused. There’s no way you’ll compete against hourly service to DFW out of LgA with one or 2 daily out of jfk. For that matter I don’t know why we bother serving ATL from JFK.
The only thing that matters is what they do. Right now that is defer airplanes, slow growth, and blow money on tech start-ups. That is the reality. What can you infer from that picture?
#304
Hope the butt-hurt goes away dear.
#306
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Its LHR. Google the point guy article. We released a video with someone looking up JFK-LHR in the jetblue app. This would strongly suggest against the A220 though.
#307
I imagine we will have a few cities in the area, like LHR, DUB, SNN, maybe KEF as well. These other cities will serve as diversion/tech stop cities in addition to being regular service.
#308
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 917
I’m going to LOL’ing so hard if it is something stupid as usual, like a new tail design or just a Southwest type wanna be Rally.
Either way, I still care 0.002% about Europe, it’s going to be a disaster if they do it.
Carry on with your speculations...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post