Search
Notices

System Bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2019, 04:58 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 591
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
Dork, I think you're saying we lost 2,000 weeks compared to having standard allocation per pilot correct (weeks per pilot at their longevity)?

In absolute terms, compared to the last PEA year, is it a loss or gain of peak summer weeks in your opinion?
yes to a standard allocation system.
BlueJetDork is offline  
Old 06-23-2019, 05:00 AM
  #62  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,880
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand View Post
Money isn’t everything but it sure helps.

you can never get time back. But You can always make more money.
Agree.

Look how many bypass upgrades, for years. Time off, and the QUALITY of that time of (timing of the time) are very important to many.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-23-2019, 05:17 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by jamesholzhauer View Post
You’ll make $211 vs $264 for how many extra months by waiting for the Aug bid with 2020 training dates? That’s a lot of opportunity cost to preserve a couple/few weeks of vacation. $4.5k/month difference assuming an 85 hour month (less taxes). Hope you can score some Jan training dates for the bus.
It isn't about the money for me. Having a holiday off is worth it.
Southerner is offline  
Old 06-23-2019, 05:45 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 591
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
The union knew most guys would prefer more weeks, at less pay, but that was not going to happen in contract #1 while also achieving great distribution.
That is not what the NC said to the pilot group.

They also said our system was standard with industry-leading distribution.

Not of which was or is true.

Also, near the top of the market absolute peak period weeks could be achieved with the middle of the road distribution and a 6% distribution.

But the Mullet was smart. He knew that with what ended up as the tired for second distribution (sold as industry leading) would result in the very low peak periods weeks by only increasing allocation by 1 week for only 1/2 the pilot group. The effect was a marginal increase in peak period (summer, etc) weeks that will be gone in the first pass through the 1 1/2 multi-pass system we got.

Sure there are rounds but longevity 1-10 gets one round and then everyone else except 7 dudes gets 1 1/2 rounds. Hardly standard.

The 35 hours feeds right into the 'it good for me' aspect that has hurt this pilot group for almost 2 decades. 35 hours only helps if you get a slot and we lost nearly 2000 slots in peak periods which is the point of a vacation system. To make sure time off is budgeted during peak periods otherwise the company would do what they have always done and said: "You have to sacrifice to work here".

The entire system is a Frankenstein and lie and is a mess.
BlueJetDork is offline  
Old 06-23-2019, 06:11 AM
  #65  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,880
Default

Originally Posted by BlueJetDork View Post
That is not what the NC said to the pilot group.

They also said our system was standard with industry-leading distribution.

Not of which was or is true.

Also, near the top of the market absolute peak period weeks could be achieved with the middle of the road distribution and a 6% distribution.

But the Mullet was smart. He knew that with what ended up as the tired for second distribution (sold as industry leading) would result in the very low peak periods weeks by only increasing allocation by 1 week for only 1/2 the pilot group. The effect was a marginal increase in peak period (summer, etc) weeks that will be gone in the first pass through the 1 1/2 multi-pass system we got.

Sure there are rounds but longevity 1-10 gets one round and then everyone else except 7 dudes gets 1 1/2 rounds. Hardly standard.

The 35 hours feeds right into the 'it good for me' aspect that has hurt this pilot group for almost 2 decades. 35 hours only helps if you get a slot and we lost nearly 2000 slots in peak periods which is the point of a vacation system. To make sure time off is budgeted during peak periods otherwise the company would do what they have always done and said: "You have to sacrifice to work here".

The entire system is a Frankenstein and lie and is a mess.
If contract #2 achieves an extra week of Vaca at each longevity step while holding all else the same, what then is still "Frankenstein"?

Obviously need more "sick" time as well.

Honest question.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-23-2019, 06:21 AM
  #66  
What’s it doing now?
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 190CA
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
If contract #2 achieves an extra week of Vaca at each longevity step while holding all else the same, what then is still "Frankenstein"?

Obviously need more "sick" time as well.

Honest question.
I’m so fawking tired of this “we’ll get em next time” horsesheit. Why would you vote for a system that’s worse than what you had in hopes that it might be better 4 years later?
Tom a Hawk is offline  
Old 06-23-2019, 06:28 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 591
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
If contract #2 achieves an extra week of Vaca at each longevity step while holding all else the same, what then is still "Frankenstein"?

Obviously, need more "sick" time as well.

Honest question.
3 weeks at year 1?

I think:

0-5 is fine now. Total of 2

5-10 add 2. Total of 4

10-15 add 3. Total of 5

16 plus add 4. Total of 6.

6% distribution each peak period month.

23 hours per period.

I would like to see at least banking hours which somehow missed the comparison from other airlines.

For instance, you pick up a POT, RSA or VDA in March and then you can bank it in your PTO or have it arrive in your check then next pay period.

But yes more PTS.

And 15 minutes of silence from Brooke Burke!
BlueJetDork is offline  
Old 06-23-2019, 06:34 AM
  #68  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,880
Default

Originally Posted by Tom a Hawk View Post
I’m so fawking tired of this “we’ll get em next time” horsesheit. Why would you vote for a system that’s worse than what you had in hopes that it might be better 4 years later?
Did you take summer vacation under the previous system or sell back your PTO?
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-23-2019, 06:36 AM
  #69  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,880
Default

Originally Posted by BlueJetDork View Post
3 weeks at year 1?

I think:

0-5 is fine now. Total of 2

5-10 add 2. Total of 4

10-15 add 3. Total of 5

16 plus add 4. Total of 6.

6% distribution each peak period month.

23 hours per period.

I would like to see at least banking hours which somehow missed the comparison from other airlines.

For instance, you pick up a POT, RSA or VDA in March and then you can bank it in your PTO or have it arrive in your check then next pay period.

But yes more PTS.

And 15 minutes of silence from Brooke Burke!
Sounds good, but I would like to see an attempt to hold on to more than 23 hours pay. Not saying anything should be sacrificed for it.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-23-2019, 06:45 AM
  #70  
What’s it doing now?
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 190CA
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
Did you take summer vacation under the previous system or sell back your PTO?
I did not sell back. I typically took 2-3 vacation weeks a year(spread throughout, one time in summer) and used the rest for drops/sick. Under the old system if I took 2 weeks I had 77 hours of pto left over and could uts. Now I’ll have 72 hours left over and can’t uts. It’s even worse at 3 weeks now assuming you can get a third (<10yrs).

This is my point. All different types of pilots were better off with the old system because they could choose what they wanted. One size does not fit this pilot group.
Tom a Hawk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
66
02-25-2012 07:11 PM
EWRflyr
United
42
07-28-2011 08:28 AM
EWRflyr
United
22
07-25-2011 09:23 AM
Roberto
Cargo
144
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices