![]() |
B6 plans
I know it’s all speculation, but does B6 buy NK to eventually become like the big 3? Or more like an all Airbus version of WN? What do you guys think is likely?
|
Originally Posted by Ratm0820
(Post 3477543)
I know it’s all speculation, but does B6 buy NK to eventually become like the big 3? Or more like an all Airbus version of WN? What do you guys think is likely?
|
It’s just business. Grow or die. Has nothing to do with “becoming like the big three.”
It’s how do we compete, grow and pay shareholders? |
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 3477546)
It’s just business. Grow or die. Has nothing to do with “becoming like the big three.”
It’s how do we compete, grow and pay shareholders? Its about keeping us from being bought. if we are bought our BOD goes the way of the NK BOD. This is a play to keep that from happening. |
Originally Posted by MainlineFlyer
(Post 3477575)
Its about keeping us from being bought. if we are bought our BOD goes the way of the NK BOD. This is a play to keep that from happening.
|
Originally Posted by MainlineFlyer
(Post 3477575)
Its about keeping us from being bought. if we are bought our BOD goes the way of the NK BOD. This is a play to keep that from happening.
|
TBD
Impossible to determine at the moment. The Jetblue battleship has a rudder the size of a notebook. Where Jetblue sails to has more to do with the overall general state of the economy and actions of competitors than the actions of management. |
Originally Posted by Sludgefund
(Post 3477758)
TBD
Impossible to determine at the moment. The Jetblue battleship has a rudder the size of a notebook. Where Jetblue sails to has more to do with the overall general state of the economy and actions of competitors than the actions of management. |
Originally Posted by PSU Flyer
(Post 3477769)
We’re more of a hot air balloon than a ship.
filler….. |
Originally Posted by Sludgefund
(Post 3477758)
TBD
Impossible to determine at the moment. The Jetblue battleship has a rudder the size of a notebook. Where Jetblue sails to has more to do with the overall general state of the economy and actions of competitors than the actions of management. |
Originally Posted by avi8orco
(Post 3477865)
And the notebook had a few trips through the hole puncher….
|
I’m actually concerned for the health of this company after the last earnings call. Record profit and we STILL couldn’t get into the black?!!! Seriously, WTF!!!? We have a SERIOUS management/leadership problem here!!!
|
Originally Posted by Combatcraig
(Post 3478024)
I’m actually concerned for the health of this company after the last earnings call. Record profit and we STILL couldn’t get into the black?!!! Seriously, WTF!!!? We have a SERIOUS management/leadership problem here!!!
I think a lot of this revenue was otherwise unsustainable given the company’s ridiculous reserve use strategy coupled with having to be a pseudo Airbus flight academy for the legacies. That being said, I also think the NEA has something to do with these increased revenues, our increased pax loads, but not necessarily our profits. I am interested to see if/how the company’s strategy changes now through this merger. Ultimately I think stability is what the company needs most. |
Originally Posted by Combatcraig
(Post 3478024)
I’m actually concerned for the health of this company after the last earnings call. Record profit and we STILL couldn’t get into the black?!!! Seriously, WTF!!!? We have a SERIOUS management/leadership problem here!!!
|
Originally Posted by Combatcraig
(Post 3478024)
I’m actually concerned for the health of this company after the last earnings call. Record profit and we STILL couldn’t get into the black?!!! Seriously, WTF!!!? We have a SERIOUS management/leadership problem here!!!
|
Have any of you part-time CFO types actually read all the documents and analyzed them? Is there any chance they “hid” profits by paying off assets, paying off debt, or something like that? I know next to nothing about this stuff, but I do know they’ve paid off lots of assets, paid off loans quickly, and bought back a ton of stock pretty quickly in the past. I just don’t know how we could actually lose that much with everyone else making money. If so, it definitely concerns me.
|
Originally Posted by PSU Flyer
(Post 3478077)
Have any of you part-time CFO types actually read all the documents and analyzed them? Is there any chance they “hid” profits by paying off assets, paying off debt, or something like that? I know next to nothing about this stuff, but I do know they’ve paid off lots of assets, paid off loans quickly, and bought back a ton of stock pretty quickly in the past. I just don’t know how we could actually lose that much with everyone else making money. If so, it definitely concerns me.
I think there were two main drivers, among many lesser drivers. One of the two main issues was high fuel costs, where the jet fuel refinery capacity in the northeast is highly constrained, which makes jet fuel purchased in the northeast more expensive than jet fuel in most of the rest of the country. That's why you see/saw a lot of tankering into BOS/JFK/EWR. Because of JB's high network concentration in the northeast, JB had more or less the highest per gallon jet fuel cost for US airlines last quarter. The second issue is the schedule reduction announced earlier this year. JB couldn't attract/train/retain enough pilots (and other staff) to reliably fly the schedule they wanted/released. So they had to reduce the schedule for the spring/summer during some of the revenue peak, which left a lot of revenue on the table. But that wasn't the biggest problem. The biggest problem is what flying less hours does to CASM, or cost per available seat mile. When you fly a lot less hours than planned, you do have a small proportional decrease in variable costs, such as fuel burn and crew overtime. But all of the airline's fixed costs (aircraft leases, salaried employees, office and training facilities, gate rentals) are now spread over a much smaller pool of available seat miles. So flying fewer hours, utilizing your assets fewer hours per day, dramatically raises your CASM, just as you take in less RASM (revenue). But the airline didn't have a better short term choice. They didn't have the staff, hadn't done what it would take to attract/train/retain pilots (and other staff) to reliably run the full schedule. Remember the COO's answer to Wall Street was that they were gonna "double down on culture" to fix the attraction/retention problem... Those two factors, fuel and schedule reduction, were almost certainly enough to go from black to red. |
JetBlue doesn’t hedge fuel, while most other airlines do. Big ouch right now.
|
Originally Posted by MinFlyer
(Post 3478160)
JetBlue doesn’t hedge fuel, while most other airlines do. Big ouch right now.
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3478159)
The second issue is the schedule reduction announced earlier this year. JB couldn't attract/train/retain enough pilots (and other staff) to reliably fly the schedule they wanted/released.
|
Originally Posted by PSU Flyer
(Post 3478177)
I honestly don’t understand this point. Aren’t we flying less than 2019 with about 10% more pilots on property? Is the 220 and SQ causing the problem there, or is it scheduling (5 hr days for pretty much everyone), or is it something else? Seems like it shouldn’t be a problem to fly less flights than we’ve done in the past with more pilots.
But it's a good question. All I know is they reduced the schedule, which directly raises CASM dramatically. Which is enough to lose money when coupled with high fuel costs. |
This is definitely cheaper than paying your pilots and offering profit sharing.
https://thepointsguy.com/news/jetblue-route-cuts-nyc-florida/amp/ |
Originally Posted by MainlineFlyer
(Post 3478185)
This is definitely cheaper than paying your pilots and offering profit sharing.
https://thepointsguy.com/news/jetblue-route-cuts-nyc-florida/amp/ The EWR cuts I think are also largely about the new terminal not being open and the scat-show the old terminal is. But not sure. Might be both the terminal+staffing+market underperformance. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3478286)
Yep...
The EWR cuts I think are also largely about the new terminal not being open and the scat-show the old terminal is. But not sure. Might be both the terminal+staffing+market underperformance. |
Originally Posted by PSU Flyer
(Post 3478177)
I honestly don’t understand this point. Aren’t we flying less than 2019 with about 10% more pilots on property? Is the 220 and SQ causing the problem there, or is it scheduling (5 hr days for pretty much everyone), or is it something else? Seems like it shouldn’t be a problem to fly less flights than we’ve done in the past with more pilots.
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3478286)
Yep...
The EWR cuts I think are also largely about the new terminal not being open and the scat-show the old terminal is. But not sure. Might be both the terminal+staffing+market underperformance. |
Originally Posted by Bgood
(Post 3478293)
The fact that we have more staffing than 2019 and less flights than 2019 but still having staffing problems probably points to schedule inefficiencies. Those days when our pairings were much better is not the case right now.
|
Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
(Post 3478298)
I think they’re planning on having it open week of Thanksgiving tentatively but early 2023 more realistically. I don’t see how Newark could be underperforming. The place seems like it should be a gold mine…flights are always full.
|
Originally Posted by Desdi
(Post 3478290)
Scat-show? I’m gonna miss those porta-potties next to the breast pumping pod inside EWR Terminal A!
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3477545)
Merging with NK provides some immediate scaling ability (planes, pilots, gates, staffing, etc) to grow the JB business model.
LOL |
Originally Posted by avi8orco
(Post 3478385)
That hell hole terminal is to give the people getting off the plane a preview of what’s to come and those leaving a last chance photo op of their trip.
|
Originally Posted by avi8orco
(Post 3478385)
That hell hole terminal is to give the people getting off the plane a preview of what’s to come and those leaving a last chance photo op of their trip.
mention) is also getting pretty long in the tooth. |
Originally Posted by Giordano Bruno
(Post 3478396)
"immediate"
LOL immediate than the normal JB trajectory? Maybe? |
Originally Posted by Virgalask330
(Post 3478444)
EWR, MCO, and JFK seem to be our worst airports at the moment. In that order. BOS (honorable
mention) is also getting pretty long in the tooth. |
Originally Posted by avi8orco
(Post 3478481)
Funny thing about MCO is that nasty carpet hasn’t changed since the early 80s. I remember that pattern of carpet in our terminal when I walked through there when I was like 5.
I’ll miss the burnt pizza smell, if they actually move to the new terminal in MCO… |
Originally Posted by avi8orco
(Post 3478481)
Funny thing about MCO is that nasty carpet hasn’t changed since the early 80s. I remember that pattern of carpet in our terminal when I walked through there when I was like 5.
https://www.amazon.com/Orlando-Inter.../dp/B09J4JWDSS |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 3480985)
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:00 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands