TA Reached
#291
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 53
Everybody(JB and NK pilots) better get their heads together for JCBA.
JB is no longer a LCC. It hasn’t been for years now. Our cost are inline with and sometimes exceed the big 4.
In 2025 JB will be a 9,000 pilot airline with flights from Europe to Hawaii with lay flat seats the entire way.
JB is no longer a LCC. It hasn’t been for years now. Our cost are inline with and sometimes exceed the big 4.
In 2025 JB will be a 9,000 pilot airline with flights from Europe to Hawaii with lay flat seats the entire way.
Last edited by RiddleEagle18; 12-17-2022 at 12:53 PM.
#292
Duration
Effective Date 2/1/2023
Amendable on 2/1/2025
60-day early opener
Association can file for Section 6 negotiations after 2/1/2024 if JetBlue/Spirit acquisition and merger is terminated
Compensation
Minimum cumulative weighted increase of 21.5% over three pay increases—potential greater increase with market rate adjustments (snap-up)
Pay tables below take effect 3/1/2023
Five months later (8/1/23): 3.125% increase or the higher of market rate adjustment (below)
DOS + 18 months (8/1/24): 3% increase or higher of market rate adjustment (below)
Market Rate Adjustment (snap-up): higher of pay rate in table or average of AA, UAL, DAL, SWA, and ALA (no cap)
Additional
Compensation
Supplemental one-time payment to be paid within 30 days of DOS.
Captains receive $17,000
First Officers receive $11,000
Probationary Pilots receive $2,000
No change to current Profit Sharing
Section 5 Expenses, Lodging and Transportation
Domestic Per Diem: increase from current book of $2.45 to $2.65 at DOS, $2.70 at DOS +1
International Per Diem: from current book of $2.70 to $3.20 at DOS, $3.25 at DOS+1
Increase in medical allowance from $250 to $350 for CAs and FOs > 60 years old, from $125 to $175 for FOs < 60 years old
Increase optional parking from stipend from $40 to $55
Increase uniform allowance from $200 to $250 with max bank increasing from $400 to $500
Section 11 Training
Incorporated provisions around bidding, CQT, OE
Section 19 Investigations and Discipline
Provides clarity to the investigation and discipline process
Section 20 Non-Disciplinary Grievances
Increased timeline for filing of grievance from 60 to 90 days
Section 21 System Board of Adjustment
Aligned with current System Board proceedings
Permits non-disciplinary grievant to attend by mutual agreement
Section 25 Scheduling
ALV change to allow ALV +/- 2 hours instead of current one hour
If Company opens new base, allowed +/- 3 hours for 24 bid periods for that base only
Effective Date 2/1/2023
Amendable on 2/1/2025
60-day early opener
Association can file for Section 6 negotiations after 2/1/2024 if JetBlue/Spirit acquisition and merger is terminated
Compensation
Minimum cumulative weighted increase of 21.5% over three pay increases—potential greater increase with market rate adjustments (snap-up)
Pay tables below take effect 3/1/2023
Five months later (8/1/23): 3.125% increase or the higher of market rate adjustment (below)
DOS + 18 months (8/1/24): 3% increase or higher of market rate adjustment (below)
Market Rate Adjustment (snap-up): higher of pay rate in table or average of AA, UAL, DAL, SWA, and ALA (no cap)
Additional
Compensation
Supplemental one-time payment to be paid within 30 days of DOS.
Captains receive $17,000
First Officers receive $11,000
Probationary Pilots receive $2,000
No change to current Profit Sharing
Section 5 Expenses, Lodging and Transportation
Domestic Per Diem: increase from current book of $2.45 to $2.65 at DOS, $2.70 at DOS +1
International Per Diem: from current book of $2.70 to $3.20 at DOS, $3.25 at DOS+1
Increase in medical allowance from $250 to $350 for CAs and FOs > 60 years old, from $125 to $175 for FOs < 60 years old
Increase optional parking from stipend from $40 to $55
Increase uniform allowance from $200 to $250 with max bank increasing from $400 to $500
Section 11 Training
Incorporated provisions around bidding, CQT, OE
Section 19 Investigations and Discipline
Provides clarity to the investigation and discipline process
Section 20 Non-Disciplinary Grievances
Increased timeline for filing of grievance from 60 to 90 days
Section 21 System Board of Adjustment
Aligned with current System Board proceedings
Permits non-disciplinary grievant to attend by mutual agreement
Section 25 Scheduling
ALV change to allow ALV +/- 2 hours instead of current one hour
If Company opens new base, allowed +/- 3 hours for 24 bid periods for that base only
#293
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 141
Everybody(JB and NK pilots) better get their heads together for JCBA.
JB is no longer a LCC. It hasn’t been for years now. Our cost are inline with and sometimes exceed the big 4.
In 2025 JB will be a 9,000 pilot airline with flights from Europe to Hawaii with lay flat seats the entire way.
JB is no longer a LCC. It hasn’t been for years now. Our cost are inline with and sometimes exceed the big 4.
In 2025 JB will be a 9,000 pilot airline with flights from Europe to Hawaii with lay flat seats the entire way.
#294
On Reserve
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 1
You do realize the ONLY reason you have the rates on this TA is because of the heavy lifting Delta pilots are in the process of achieving, right? But by all means, keep badmouthing the only pilot group this cycle to set the bar.
Somehow Master Shake is the perfect avatar.
Somehow Master Shake is the perfect avatar.
#296
I guess I've changed my mind. I was leaning toward voting yes. but now I'm voting no.
Delta voted no and got more. united voted no and are surely on the way to getting more. what is happening with American? didn't they also vote no on something?
I think the nc and mec can only do so much. I think they did a lot negotiating with the company. but I think now it's our turn. by saying no we can show the company that just like Delta and united and maybe American, they need to give us more.
unfortunately for the way I feel, I think that the company gave just enough so that this passes. which of course is their goal from their side of the negotiations.
but I really think saying no to this would show the company that we as a whole group know we deserve more.
Delta voted no and got more. united voted no and are surely on the way to getting more. what is happening with American? didn't they also vote no on something?
I think the nc and mec can only do so much. I think they did a lot negotiating with the company. but I think now it's our turn. by saying no we can show the company that just like Delta and united and maybe American, they need to give us more.
unfortunately for the way I feel, I think that the company gave just enough so that this passes. which of course is their goal from their side of the negotiations.
but I really think saying no to this would show the company that we as a whole group know we deserve more.
#297
To all of you thinking “we will get them in the JCBA”, I truly believe passing this codification of industry trailing pay will weaken our position for a JCBA, not strengthen it.
First off, this right here was our shot at profit sharing. If we let that ship sail on us now, it’s not turning back. We had profit sharing, even with the juicy cliff, it did payout, and then the company decided we weren’t worth it, and they unilaterally killed it, as it wasn’t codified. Then the JCBA came, and our union codified the worthless never-gonna-pay-squat formula, lending it tacit approval. “Don’t worry, we will get it next time”. Well - NEWSFLASH - this is next time, the union even said so. This will put the final blue-pilot seal of approval on the fact that blue pilots agree they don’t deserve profit sharing. There will be way too many moving pieces in a JCBA, and there will already be a lot of heavy lifting to bring Spirit up to our compensation while also trying to keep some of the good Spirit stuff. Our union have clearly demonstrated they are willing to sacrifice PS to seal a deal, I can’t understand why anyone would think next time will magically be different.
Next, just days after DAL announces their industry-leading TA, we settle for rates below theirs. Our 220-300 pay is below even their 220-100 pay. So we clearly broadcast that we agree we don’t deserve industry-leading pay. Then, as if that weren’t enough, we etch that message into stone by codifying that laughable industry-AVERAGE “snap-up” clause, which, be definition, could never be even equal to whoever is industry-leading, as it gets pulled down by the others in the group. The icing on that blech-cake is that, just after our last crummy LOA removed Alaska from our peer set, our pilot group is now saying we are fine with them again, but we set our comparison window a month before theirs, so we will have to wait a year to get any raise, however small, that results from our snap-to-average.
My point being, this TA broadcasts to all who will listen that our pilot group agrees that we do not deserve industry leading pay, and we don’t care enough about profit sharing to fight for it. If we aren’t willing to use our leverage now, what makes anyone think next time will be different?
First off, this right here was our shot at profit sharing. If we let that ship sail on us now, it’s not turning back. We had profit sharing, even with the juicy cliff, it did payout, and then the company decided we weren’t worth it, and they unilaterally killed it, as it wasn’t codified. Then the JCBA came, and our union codified the worthless never-gonna-pay-squat formula, lending it tacit approval. “Don’t worry, we will get it next time”. Well - NEWSFLASH - this is next time, the union even said so. This will put the final blue-pilot seal of approval on the fact that blue pilots agree they don’t deserve profit sharing. There will be way too many moving pieces in a JCBA, and there will already be a lot of heavy lifting to bring Spirit up to our compensation while also trying to keep some of the good Spirit stuff. Our union have clearly demonstrated they are willing to sacrifice PS to seal a deal, I can’t understand why anyone would think next time will magically be different.
Next, just days after DAL announces their industry-leading TA, we settle for rates below theirs. Our 220-300 pay is below even their 220-100 pay. So we clearly broadcast that we agree we don’t deserve industry-leading pay. Then, as if that weren’t enough, we etch that message into stone by codifying that laughable industry-AVERAGE “snap-up” clause, which, be definition, could never be even equal to whoever is industry-leading, as it gets pulled down by the others in the group. The icing on that blech-cake is that, just after our last crummy LOA removed Alaska from our peer set, our pilot group is now saying we are fine with them again, but we set our comparison window a month before theirs, so we will have to wait a year to get any raise, however small, that results from our snap-to-average.
My point being, this TA broadcasts to all who will listen that our pilot group agrees that we do not deserve industry leading pay, and we don’t care enough about profit sharing to fight for it. If we aren’t willing to use our leverage now, what makes anyone think next time will be different?
#298
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
I guess I've changed my mind. I was leaning toward voting yes. but now I'm voting no.
Delta voted no and got more. united voted no and are surely on the way to getting more. what is happening with American? didn't they also vote no on something?
I think the nc and mec can only do so much. I think they did a lot negotiating with the company. but I think now it's our turn. by saying no we can show the company that just like Delta and united and maybe American, they need to give us more.
unfortunately for the way I feel, I think that the company gave just enough so that this passes. which of course is their goal from their side of the negotiations.
but I really think saying no to this would show the company that we as a whole group know we deserve more.
Delta voted no and got more. united voted no and are surely on the way to getting more. what is happening with American? didn't they also vote no on something?
I think the nc and mec can only do so much. I think they did a lot negotiating with the company. but I think now it's our turn. by saying no we can show the company that just like Delta and united and maybe American, they need to give us more.
unfortunately for the way I feel, I think that the company gave just enough so that this passes. which of course is their goal from their side of the negotiations.
but I really think saying no to this would show the company that we as a whole group know we deserve more.
AA later had a TA, but it never made it past the APA BOD vote. Shot down 15-5 before reaching the membership. Shortly after DAL announced their current AIP. DALPA never voted anything down in this round. They’ve been in mediation since the onset of negotiations.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



