Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   JetBlue (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/jetblue/)
-   -   Anyone else getting concerned? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/jetblue/145081-anyone-else-getting-concerned.html)

RemoveB4flght 10-30-2023 12:53 PM


Originally Posted by upup89 (Post 3717614)
Yes it would have to be voted on by SAVE shareholders. JetBlue management would be negligent to over pay so badly for Spirit with its current issues and long term path to profitability.

Again, JetBlue is not buying Spirit’s operation, they are buying its staff and assets, the value of which have not changed. Spirit could be profiting massively or hemorrhaging money and it would not make any difference as the business model will cease to exist. If you want to argue that grounded NEO’s would be less valuable, a good portion of the fleet would need to be grounded to refit and repaint at some point anyway, and the recompense from Pratt for the operational impacts would transfer to JetBlue anyway.

Climbto450 10-30-2023 01:15 PM


Originally Posted by RemoveB4flght (Post 3717620)
Again, JetBlue is not buying Spirit’s operation, they are buying its staff and assets, the value of which have not changed. Spirit could be profiting massively or hemorrhaging money and it would not make any difference as the business model will cease to exist. If you want to argue that grounded NEO’s would be less valuable, a good portion of the fleet would need to be grounded to refit and repaint at some point anyway, and the recompense from Pratt for the operational impacts would transfer to JetBlue anyway.

Agreed it is an asset /aircraft required staffing /training center purchase nothing more.

tallpilot 10-30-2023 01:40 PM


Originally Posted by Flyhayes (Post 3717591)
Spirits plan is/was to have 297 airplanes by 2027. For us to purchase new airplanes, we would spend nearly 30 billion. Granted, planes lose value etc, so the replacement cost isn't very accurate.
there is also the huge cost opirtunity to get their order book and not have to go to the back of the line.
this also doesn't include the cost opportunity of instantly getting the pilots and training center. Even at what we are paying, I think we are getting a phenomenal deal.

Correct. This deal is about pilots and airplanes, everything else is gravy. Also one less ULCC and hideous yellow liveries is a public service.

121noob 10-30-2023 01:58 PM

Wasn't the main point of the deal to get western routes and slots?

Flyby1206 10-30-2023 02:01 PM


Originally Posted by 121noob (Post 3717663)
Wasn't the main point of the deal to get western routes and slots?

No, JB has been pretty open about needing planes/pilots so they can expand. Sure some of that expansion will probably be west of BUF, but NK doesn't hold some sacred route authority or valuable slot portfolio out west. JB isn't interested in the NK customer base, brand, or business model.

Noisecanceller 10-30-2023 05:14 PM


Originally Posted by Climbto450 (Post 3717638)
Agreed it is an asset /aircraft required staffing /training center purchase nothing more.

Yep. Planes, real estate, and people. None of that has changed. If JB backs out they risk spirit finding another partner, restructuring and going it alone, or getting chopped into pieces of which JB may only be able to buy a fraction of what they want with the balance being split among other carriers.

If the DOJ wins both Spirit and JB are in very dire straits. Spirit more so than JB though. Needless to say I’m updating my logbook when I thought I’d be retiring from this airline. The next 2 months will be a big turning point.

The DOJ needs to take their ball and go home and just leave us alone.

todd1200 10-30-2023 05:50 PM


Originally Posted by Roy Biggins (Post 3717609)
Does anyone know for certain what type of interest rate JB is paying on this loan? They secured it years ago, so it seems possible they locked in a low rate when they initially got the loan?

The interest rates are in the the Bridge Facility.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...7786dex991.htm

This one may have been superseded? I can't remember the date of the most recent one. This one quotes SOFR plus between 3% and 4.5%. So somewhere around 8 - 10% as of now, but it will fluctuate.

This is just the bridge to get through the first year. I guess that gives them time to negotiate longer term financing? I dunno how these transactions usually work.

SmitteyB 10-30-2023 07:30 PM


Originally Posted by 121noob (Post 3717663)
Wasn't the main point of the deal to get western routes and slots?

Just to be clear, there are only 3 slot controlled airports in the US.

JFK, LGA, and DCA.

The issue is gate access/infrastructure in non-slot controlled airports.

los74 10-31-2023 04:35 AM

With the $141 million loss (probably higher) in Q3 which includes August and September there is plenty of room to be concerned. B6 is posting losses 3 out of the 4 quarters. B6 is having the financial phone call via web as a listen only, so no questions allowed from investors. In three months B6 has lost 66% of share value which says the investors do not trust or have realized B6 is full of it and they are leaving the building. B6 always blames the weather, the NE, the E-190 and the everything else except the lack of competent people running the show and the horrible operations B6 runs. What load factor does B6 need to have to make a profit? The planes are almost full which means B6 needs about 100% load factor to make money. Historically airlines need to have a load factor of 60% to make a profit. The story that we operate out of the NE is old news and B6 decided to operate out of the NE so figure it out. All carriers operate out of the NE so B6 is not alone. The E190 excuse is also old news and those that are paid for should be used until there are enough A220s with the major mechanical issues with this airplane solved. Probably the most important thing is that B6 needs real new management and exterminate many unnecessary management positions to become lean and efficient.

Bluedriver 10-31-2023 05:06 AM


Originally Posted by los74 (Post 3717921)
With the $141 million loss (probably higher) in Q3 which includes August and September there is plenty of room to be concerned. B6 is posting losses 3 out of the 4 quarters. B6 is having the financial phone call via web as a listen only, so no questions allowed from investors. In three months B6 has lost 66% of share value which says the investors do not trust or have realized B6 is full of it and they are leaving the building. B6 always blames the weather, the NE, the E-190 and the everything else except the lack of competent people running the show and the horrible operations B6 runs. What load factor does B6 need to have to make a profit? The planes are almost full which means B6 needs about 100% load factor to make money. Historically airlines need to have a load factor of 60% to make a profit. The story that we operate out of the NE is old news and B6 decided to operate out of the NE so figure it out. All carriers operate out of the NE so B6 is not alone. The E190 excuse is also old news and those that are paid for should be used until there are enough A220s with the major mechanical issues with this airplane solved. Probably the most important thing is that B6 needs real new management and exterminate many unnecessary management positions to become lean and efficient.

The 60% load factor to break even is a very old rule of thumb based on an entirely different revenue management system. Irrelevant now for any large airline.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands