JetBlue Latest and Greatest
#4181
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,621

Maybe that's their backwards way of staffing this place for a CBA. I'm sure that's not it and I've been told they paused it because inflight hates it but who knows.
As far as a timeline to implementation of work rules that would effect staffing, none of that information has been released from the negotiating committee. Everything is negotiable and it's not our problem if the company can't fly the full schedule because of inadequate staffing. They can try to plan ahead and hire more guys now. Or they can wait and see what they'll need. If you've experienced an IROP here you know how they'll handle that choice.
As far as a timeline to implementation of work rules that would effect staffing, none of that information has been released from the negotiating committee. Everything is negotiable and it's not our problem if the company can't fly the full schedule because of inadequate staffing. They can try to plan ahead and hire more guys now. Or they can wait and see what they'll need. If you've experienced an IROP here you know how they'll handle that choice.
Just my opinion, we all have one.

#4182
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: B6
Posts: 1,047

My opinion is if more go the rally's the sooner your opinion will happen.
#4183
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206

I wouldn't hire a second earlier than I had to, if I were in charge of staffing. The CBA will take at least 6 months to implement, and maybe a year for some sections. That's plenty of time to staff to the appropriate level. Besides, they don't know what the staffing need truly is until the language is written AND implemented. So there will be tweaking even after implementation. At my last company it took months for them to find the right level after the CBA.
#4184
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,621

I wouldn't hire a second earlier than I had to, if I were in charge of staffing. The CBA will take at least 6 months to implement, and maybe a year for some sections. That's plenty of time to staff to the appropriate level. Besides, they don't know what the staffing need truly is until the language is written AND implemented. So there will be tweaking even after implementation. At my last company it took months for them to find the right level after the CBA.
#4185
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206

Even if the TA were here today it would be January before the effective date most likely, then 6 months of implementation. I bet we have an agreement in principle by January, and a TA to vote on by March/ April for a June effective date. Then 6 months to implement the work rules.
#4186
Covfefe
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001

Even if the TA were here today it would be January before the effective date most likely, then 6 months of implementation. I bet we have an agreement in principle by January, and a TA to vote on by March/ April for a June effective date. Then 6 months to implement the work rules.
#4187
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206

It's not outside the realm of possibility. But I agree it's aggressive. We are down to the stuff that can be settled quickly with a mediator. My point was that even with an aggressive negotiating timeline, we are 15 months from full implementation.
#4188
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,316

What is the incentive for the company to start paying millions more right now? They are filling classes and making bank.
#4189
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236

Because they have to eventually settle on a plan for the future of this airline. I don't think they can come up with one without knowing the details of the CBA. Wall Street will begin to lose patience.
#4190
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,316

Think of all those 10 hour 3 days that will have to pay 15+ hours now. 😂
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post