JetBlue Latest and Greatest
06-14-2018, 05:56 PM
#6511
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot
Yea- Im buying into an anonymous online characterization of a long-winded blow hard on APC
Do you actually think I gaf? This is just batting practice.
Any theory about Q is feasible- His motives are unclear- Do YOU know him or what he wants? Or do you just revel in the fact that you both have already decided to vote no with little info?
Seek happiness and lighten up BD- You must get multiple nosebleeds.
Enjoy the new CBA, whether its sooner or later.
I honestly mean this with a wink and a nod.
Do you actually think I gaf? This is just batting practice.
Any theory about Q is feasible- His motives are unclear- Do YOU know him or what he wants? Or do you just revel in the fact that you both have already decided to vote no with little info?
Seek happiness and lighten up BD- You must get multiple nosebleeds.
Enjoy the new CBA, whether its sooner or later.
I honestly mean this with a wink and a nod.
06-14-2018, 06:05 PM
#6512
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
Originally Posted by hilltopflyer
I don’t think he is a fh plant but Im sure he doesn’t work here. I wonder if he is a pilot at all at times so that’s the only thing that makes me wonder about being a management plant.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
06-15-2018, 03:55 AM
#6513
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,880
Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot
Yea- Im buying into an anonymous online characterization of a long-winded blow hard on APC
Do you actually think I gaf? This is just batting practice.
Any theory about Q is feasible- His motives are unclear- Do YOU know him or what he wants? Or do you just revel in the fact that you both have already decided to vote no with little info?
Seek happiness and lighten up BD- You must get multiple nosebleeds.
Enjoy the new CBA, whether its sooner or later.
I honestly mean this with a wink and a nod.
Do you actually think I gaf? This is just batting practice.
Any theory about Q is feasible- His motives are unclear- Do YOU know him or what he wants? Or do you just revel in the fact that you both have already decided to vote no with little info?
Seek happiness and lighten up BD- You must get multiple nosebleeds.
Enjoy the new CBA, whether its sooner or later.
I honestly mean this with a wink and a nod.
I definitely don't agree with everything Q says and have said so.
I simply asked J what the company's motive would be to derail this new agree they "need" in order to move forward with fleet review and their "big plans". He didn't answer. You seemed to agree, so I asked you?
What has gotten into you man?
06-15-2018, 04:43 AM
#6514
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: B6
Posts: 1,047
[QUOTE=Bluedriver;2614848]Again with the lies! Quote me saying I'm a NO vote please?
I definitely don't agree with everything Q says and have said so.
I simply asked J what the company's motive would be to derail this new agree they "need" in order to move forward with fleet review and their "big plans". He didn't answer. You seemed to agree, so I asked you?
What has gotten into you man?[/QUOTE]
What has gotten into you? You constantly make stuff about me, what I say or have said! Now its not OK for someone else to do it? The old this is my sandbox...my toys, my rules?
You act like your a gift from heaven to the internet.......
I definitely don't agree with everything Q says and have said so.
I simply asked J what the company's motive would be to derail this new agree they "need" in order to move forward with fleet review and their "big plans". He didn't answer. You seemed to agree, so I asked you?
What has gotten into you man?[/QUOTE]
What has gotten into you? You constantly make stuff about me, what I say or have said! Now its not OK for someone else to do it? The old this is my sandbox...my toys, my rules?
You act like your a gift from heaven to the internet.......
06-15-2018, 05:13 AM
#6515
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,880
[QUOTE=hyperboy;2614873]
Go play in traffic tool.
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Again with the lies! Quote me saying I'm a NO vote please?
I definitely don't agree with everything Q says and have said so.
I simply asked J what the company's motive would be to derail this new agree they "need" in order to move forward with fleet review and their "big plans". He didn't answer. You seemed to agree, so I asked you?
What has gotten into you man?[/QUOTE]
What has gotten into you? You constantly make stuff about me, what I say or have said! Now its not OK for someone else to do it? The old this is my sandbox...my toys, my rules?
You act like your a gift from heaven to the internet.......
I definitely don't agree with everything Q says and have said so.
I simply asked J what the company's motive would be to derail this new agree they "need" in order to move forward with fleet review and their "big plans". He didn't answer. You seemed to agree, so I asked you?
What has gotten into you man?[/QUOTE]
What has gotten into you? You constantly make stuff about me, what I say or have said! Now its not OK for someone else to do it? The old this is my sandbox...my toys, my rules?
You act like your a gift from heaven to the internet.......
06-15-2018, 06:02 AM
#6516
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Again with the lies! Quote me saying I'm a NO vote please?
I definitely don't agree with everything Q says and have said so.
I simply asked J what the company's motive would be to derail this new agree they "need" in order to move forward with fleet review and their "big plans". He didn't answer. You seemed to agree, so I asked you?
What has gotten into you man?
I definitely don't agree with everything Q says and have said so.
I simply asked J what the company's motive would be to derail this new agree they "need" in order to move forward with fleet review and their "big plans". He didn't answer. You seemed to agree, so I asked you?
What has gotten into you man?
Are you actually trying to sell that you're going to look at the TA with an open mind? It's hard to tell with you.
Ive always been in agreement with you on the critique of B6, but not on your quick-triggered approach to judging the entire TA on bulletpoints alone.
You claim to be undecided, but your overall agreement with the close-minded Q, paints a different picture. I have not and will not block your posts like I have others, but dont pretend to have an open mind here. Your posts dont support that...Yet.
Not attacking here btw.
06-15-2018, 08:21 AM
#6517
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,880
The bullet points (highlights in my strong opinion) very much disappoint me.
With that said, I'm smart enough to know I need to judge the entire agreement in totality.
But I don't stop there. I also believe I need to base my vote on the totality of the agreement *in addition* to what I believe the likely outcomes are going to be if this group votes it down.
So I look at the totality of the agreement as well as the likely outcomes of a NO vote in context.
With that said, I'm smart enough to know I need to judge the entire agreement in totality.
But I don't stop there. I also believe I need to base my vote on the totality of the agreement *in addition* to what I believe the likely outcomes are going to be if this group votes it down.
So I look at the totality of the agreement as well as the likely outcomes of a NO vote in context.
06-15-2018, 09:04 AM
#6518
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
The bullet points (highlights in my strong opinion) very much disappoint me.
With that said, I'm smart enough to know I need to judge the entire agreement in totality.
But I don't stop there. I also believe I need to base my vote on the totality of the agreement *in addition* to what I believe the likely outcomes are going to be if this group votes it down.
So I look at the totality of the agreement as well as the likely outcomes of a NO vote in context.
With that said, I'm smart enough to know I need to judge the entire agreement in totality.
But I don't stop there. I also believe I need to base my vote on the totality of the agreement *in addition* to what I believe the likely outcomes are going to be if this group votes it down.
So I look at the totality of the agreement as well as the likely outcomes of a NO vote in context.
The pairing construction also intrigues me.
It appears miles ahead of Alaska and more on a SWA par.
Again, no decision until I see the rates worked into the pairings and work rules/rigs.
I also like the vacation- I hated having to save my pto just to get awarded 2 weeks. I get em now anyway and can burn through my pto.
To each his own.
06-15-2018, 09:13 AM
#6519
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 988
Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot
Absolutely agree except I like the bulletpoints because this contract is primarily about work rules/retirement and scope.
The pairing construction also intrigues me.
It appears miles ahead of Alaska and more on a SWA par.
Again, no decision until I see the rates worked into the pairings and work rules/rigs.
I also like the vacation- I hated having to save my pto just to get awarded 2 weeks. I get em now anyway and can burn through my pto.
To each his own.
The pairing construction also intrigues me.
It appears miles ahead of Alaska and more on a SWA par.
Again, no decision until I see the rates worked into the pairings and work rules/rigs.
I also like the vacation- I hated having to save my pto just to get awarded 2 weeks. I get em now anyway and can burn through my pto.
To each his own.
Why can't we have both?! For the life of me I can't understand this line of thinking.
Why can't we have the work rules and scope AND:
PS without a cliff
3% COLA
1 additional week per grouping
No OE trips withheld
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I'm tired of hearing the following excuses:
This is our first contract, need to solidify the base, then we'll get the stuff that's short on this TA the next time
What happens if the economy crashes....then what?
I'm a junior guy and it's super dooper good for me. I'm in!
+++++++++++++++++++++
So much f-ing shortsightedness with this pilot group it's nauseating...
06-15-2018, 09:18 AM
#6520
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 312
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Again with the lies! Quote me saying I'm a NO vote please?
I definitely don't agree with everything Q says and have said so.
I simply asked J what the company's motive would be to derail this new agree they "need" in order to move forward with fleet review and their "big plans". He didn't answer. You seemed to agree, so I asked you?
What has gotten into you man?
I definitely don't agree with everything Q says and have said so.
I simply asked J what the company's motive would be to derail this new agree they "need" in order to move forward with fleet review and their "big plans". He didn't answer. You seemed to agree, so I asked you?
What has gotten into you man?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
