Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > Kalitta Companies
Kalitta TA Released to Members >

Kalitta TA Released to Members

Search
Notices

Kalitta TA Released to Members

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2016, 12:21 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 769
Default

Originally Posted by goldfinger View Post
I agree with you 100% that it isn't the majority of Atlas pilots. It just isn't. However, there are a few Atlas pilots in the union leadership who in fact would love and have tried, to sabotage a contract for the K4 crews. We all know who they are and what their agenda is. It certainly isn't the betterment of the situation at K4.

I'm sure any K4 people
would be happy to share some bar space with any, with one notable exception, Atlas crew.
Lemme guess....Cliffy?
myoface is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 04:09 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: FO
Posts: 525
Default

Been looking at K4 for awhile now and I've considered applying depending upon this TA.

Heard there was language allowing for home basing anywhere in the world and business class tickets on DH? Can someone clarify that?

As for the hostile areas, I agree. That shouldn't be decided by the company, but probably by the state department website, especially if you are working a government contract. I spent a fair amount of time in some of those places, just look at the uplift for certain companies in Africa or the Middle East that technically aren't in the middle of a war.

Thanks in advance.
HVYMETALDRVR is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 05:57 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Boeing, left side
Posts: 181
Default

Originally Posted by HVYMETALDRVR View Post
Been looking at K4 for awhile now and I've considered applying depending upon this TA.

Heard there was language allowing for home basing anywhere in the world and business class tickets on DH? Can someone clarify that?

As for the hostile areas, I agree. That shouldn't be decided by the company, but probably by the state department website, especially if you are working a government contract. I spent a fair amount of time in some of those places, just look at the uplift for certain companies in Africa or the Middle East that technically aren't in the middle of a war.

Thanks in advance.
Your "Resident Airport" is defined as an airport located within the 48 contiguous states. The RA for Alaska is defined as ANC and the RA for Hawaii is defined as HNL. Pretty sure if you want to live in another country, you're on your own to get yourself to those airports for your company-provided travel. However, the company has historically provided some travel to some crews living overseas from other places, IF it was convenient to the company. That doesn't mean the trend will continue.

For business class DH, the company will provide business class or better for any flight segment scheduled to exceed 3 hours flight time, provided it departs from or arrives at an OCONUS location. So if you live in, say, Dallas, and you need to get to ANC, your ticket from DFW-ORD might be in coach but your ORD-ANC leg will be business class (or first, since there is no business class "domestically"). There is also an option for the crewmember to decline the business class travel and take some cash instead ($250 or $500, depending on the length).

I couldn't see the company ever agreeing to your State Department idea, whether that might be a good idea or not. Just glancing at the State website, there are travel warnings for the Philippines, Haiti, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and many other places. In this line of business we would be making hostile area pay for almost every place we go, and that would be a deal-breaker for the company.

Last edited by shroomwell; 11-26-2016 at 06:09 AM.
shroomwell is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 06:27 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by shroomwell View Post
Your "Resident Airport" is defined as an airport located within the 48 contiguous states. The RA for Alaska is defined as ANC and the RA for Hawaii is defined as HNL. Pretty sure if you want to live in another country, you're on your own to get yourself to those airports for your company-provided travel. However, the company has historically provided some travel to some crews living overseas from other places, IF it was convenient to the company. That doesn't mean the trend will continue.

For business class DH, the company will provide business class or better for any flight segment scheduled to exceed 3 hours flight time, provided it departs from or arrives at an OCONUS location. So if you live in, say, Dallas, and you need to get to ANC, your ticket from DFW-ORD might be in coach but your ORD-ANC leg will be business class (or first, since there is no business class "domestically"). There is also an option for the crewmember to decline the business class travel and take some cash instead ($250 or $500, depending on the length).

I couldn't see the company ever agreeing to your State Department idea, whether that might be a good idea or not. Just glancing at the State website, there are travel warnings for the Philippines, Haiti, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and many other places. In this line of business we would be making hostile area pay for almost every place we go, and that would be a deal-breaker for the company.

Piggy backing on this... Our language at Atlas is virtually identical and we attempted to argue that if the military deems the area to be Tax Free/Hostile Fire that it should automatically be Hostile for Atlas. We lost. I'm sure Kalitta will get Iraq and Afghanistan with that language but I wouldn't trust Connie as far as I could throw him for anywhere else.
Globemaster2827 is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 06:41 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: FO
Posts: 525
Default

Originally Posted by shroomwell View Post
Your "Resident Airport" is defined as an airport located within the 48 contiguous states. The RA for Alaska is defined as ANC and the RA for Hawaii is defined as HNL. Pretty sure if you want to live in another country, you're on your own to get yourself to those airports for your company-provided travel. However, the company has historically provided some travel to some crews living overseas from other places, IF it was convenient to the company. That doesn't mean the trend will continue.

For business class DH, the company will provide business class or better for any flight segment scheduled to exceed 3 hours flight time, provided it departs from or arrives at an OCONUS location. So if you live in, say, Dallas, and you need to get to ANC, your ticket from DFW-ORD might be in coach but your ORD-ANC leg will be business class (or first, since there is no business class "domestically"). There is also an option for the crewmember to decline the business class travel and take some cash instead ($250 or $500, depending on the length).

I couldn't see the company ever agreeing to your State Department idea, whether that might be a good idea or not. Just glancing at the State website, there are travel warnings for the Philippines, Haiti, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and many other places. In this line of business we would be making hostile area pay for almost every place we go, and that would be a deal-breaker for the company.
Thanks for the heads up about the travel situation and good luck, I'll be keeping a close eye on what is going on over there.

The key though on the second part is the % uplift, not travel warnings. My company for example works government and private contracts (we are not 121). The government contracts follow the state department recommendations, which is already allotted for in the contract when it is written and should be paid for by the government anyways. I never understood why that rule doesn't seem to apply to the 121 supplemental as it does do the PT 91 and 135 operators like MAG-D, Berry, and L3. Our commercial contracts abroad just pay our standard overseas rate and carry tax advantages with no uplift.

But again, sorry I didn't clarify earlier. I'm just spit balling here and pointing out what government contracts pay abroad. Philippines and Saudi, actually don't have a danger or hazard % uplift at all, only hardship differential (which you wouldn't qualify since you are only there for a few days.) Haiti and Mexico have a 15% uplift. To be honest Mindanao (the southernmost major island of PH) probably should, though I don't think any of the strips on that island can handle a 747 anyways. Just to give you more examples of the places K4 might commonly flies too, UAE, UK, France, Bahrain, and HKG all of which have zero uplift.


Here is the website.

https://aoprals.state.gov/web920/loc...asp?menu_id=95

Thanks again.
HVYMETALDRVR is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 06:47 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by goldfinger View Post
The Atlas boys are trying to defeat our TA because it doesn't benefit THEM. Lets not have short memories. Lets not forget how hard they tried to down any agreement that they didn't approve of just a few short weeks ago. Screw them. This is about US, the Kalitta pilots and ONLY us. The rest of them, those who don't walk on our property nor eat at our table, are just furthering their own agenda and attempting to do so at our expense. See them for what they are...
Sure, this TA doesn't benefit the Atlas pilots but it doesn't benefit the Kalitta pilots either. Those of us making negative remarks about the TA do not live in a vacuum. Please compare the details of your TA with the CBAs of American, Delta, United, FedEx, UPS, and Southwest. This is the TA grading standard that the Kalitta pilots should be using and it will be the grading standard that the Atlas pilots will be using on their own TA, when that time comes.

The only reason a pilot group's CBA is sub-standard at this point is because they allow it to be (this statement not only applies to Kalitta, but Atlas as well).
JonnyKnoxville is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 07:39 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 127
Default

Lots of talk about Atlas vs Kalitta, talk about hazardous areas definition, but NO discussion on compensation, health insurance, vacation, etc. Why is the meat of the issue not being discussed?
coolyokeluke is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 07:49 AM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by DC8DRIVER View Post
That's some pretty strong words for a union member to spout about his fellow union brothers and sisters. But, maybe unionism isn't your thing. Maybe it's all about you. Maybe that's why we didn't see you walking the line this week during the ABX strike. Maybe it's easier for you to point your finger at your fellow union members and blame us for your lot in life when we all know that only Connie Kalitta controls your destiny. Using any Atlas pilots as a scapegoat for your contract woes is disgusting and it's wrong.

8
Perhaps we think that instead of DW and a couple of his minions deciding whats best for the K4 crews, its best that we decide that for ourselves, without interference from the party central committee. Its called freedom. Since you brought it up, how much shoe leather did YOU wear out walking the line with the ABX crews this week? Did you see any K4 pilots crossing a picket line? Simply put, we want the right to self determination. I will say it again since you and a couple others seem to be engaging in campaign to sabotage the vote on our TA, if you don't eat at our table, if you don't work on our property, you dont have the right to determine how we will vote nor live. Since doing that, since thwarting the will of those who's lives and families are affected to benefit the agenda of yourself and several others is even more "wrong and disgusting" Have you noticed that a large majority of us have our middle finger raised to those few of you involved in this?
goldfinger is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 08:01 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Boeing, left side
Posts: 181
Default

Originally Posted by coolyokeluke View Post
Lots of talk about Atlas vs Kalitta, talk about hazardous areas definition, but NO discussion on compensation, health insurance, vacation, etc. Why is the meat of the issue not being discussed?
Check the posts on the Kalitta hiring thread around August 27-28th. Someone posted the pay scales then and they should be the ones that ended up in the TA.
shroomwell is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 08:52 AM
  #40  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: B744 CA
Posts: 14
Default

CAPTAIN
Years DOS DOS+1 DOS+2 DOS+3
1 130.80 137.34 142.84 149.98
2 167.14 175.49 182.51 191.64
3 193.63 203.31 211.44 222.01
4 199.75 209.74 218.13 229.03
5 207.89 218.28 227.01 238.36
6 214.01 224.71 233.70 245.38
7 220.13 231.14 240.38 252.40
8 226.24 237.55 247.05 259.40
9 232.36 243.98 253.74 266.42
10 238.45 250.37 260.39 273.41
11 244.57 256.80 267.08 280.43
12 249.67 262.16 272.64 286.28



FO
Years DOS DOS+1 DOS+2 DOS+3
1 101.56 106.63 110.90 116.44
2 113.65 119.33 124.10 130.31
3 131.66 138.24 143.77 150.96
4 135.81 142.60 148.31 155.72
5 141.36 148.43 154.37 162.08
6 145.51 152.79 158.90 166.85
7 149.70 157.18 163.47 171.64
8 153.84 161.53 167.99 176.39
9 158.01 165.91 172.54 181.17
10 162.15 170.25 177.06 185.92
11 165.39 173.65 180.60 189.63
12 168.70 177.14 184.22 193.43
jimchi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gordoashot
Union Talk
1
04-04-2015 05:00 PM
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
23
01-16-2011 09:18 AM
iaflyer
Kalitta Companies
0
12-05-2007 11:56 AM
ghilis101
Kalitta Companies
64
04-09-2007 02:46 PM
Bengalsfan
Major
9
08-21-2005 07:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices