Search
Notices

Kalitta T/A - Tasty Tidbits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2016, 10:40 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by Stimpy the Kat View Post
" The negotiating committee should be embarrassed. " - Code Red

Absolutely NOT. These guys worked endlessly to get to this point.

I spoke with a certain member of the Union structure and we discussed the theory of diminishing returns and how we may have reached that point.

So, it has been put out for a vote by the membership to decide whether we continue on or vote this in, and correctly so. If they had continued on for another 6-months to a year I'm sure people would be screaming over that...So, ultimately the decision is now left to US.

I agree with most of your observations regarding rig, scheduling, work rules, etc. but, can not agree with the above quoted statement.

We are at where we are at and it is what it is...The main thing is it's in OUR hands now.

I don't like certain parts as discussed, however... I also see the point in further delay negating any more benefit and actually resulting in loss in some areas.

Vote your conscience.
Your post is spot on,now is anyone listening?
newb2 is offline  
Old 11-28-2016, 10:46 AM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
fr8ghtdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: 747-8 FO
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by Stimpy the Kat View Post
" The negotiating committee should be embarrassed. " - Code Red

Absolutely NOT. These guys worked endlessly to get to this point.

I spoke with a certain member of the Union structure and we discussed the theory of diminishing returns and how we may have reached that point.

So, it has been put out for a vote by the membership to decide whether we continue on or vote this in, and correctly so. If they had continued on for another 6-months to a year I'm sure people would be screaming over that...So, ultimately the decision is now left to US.

I agree with most of your observations regarding rig, scheduling, work rules, etc. but, can not agree with the above quoted statement.

We are at where we are at and it is what it is...The main thing is it's in OUR hands now.

I don't like certain parts as discussed, however... I also see the point in further delay negating any more benefit and actually resulting in loss in some areas.

Vote your conscience.
From a Kalitta Line Pilot, This sums it up very well and is probably the most relevant post (Stimpy the Kat) anyone has made up till now
fr8ghtdawg is offline  
Old 11-28-2016, 10:52 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by newb2 View Post
I understand your frustration and as such I suggest you vote accordingly.



But and however, the problem is not the negotiating committee, it was and is the mediator because he was not going to release us to self-help. So knowing this it would be better to turn over this abomination of a contract for the rank and file to vote down.

The only problem with this scenario is the old guys are voting for the contract, and every one of the new guys I have spoken to are also voting for the contract. Without exception they have all said they will only be here until they find a new job and they want the money. So like it or not this is what we are up against.

So I will say it one more time for those that did not understand it the last time. Quit blaming Dan Wells, I believe the reason he did not want to sign off on this contract is because in today’s market it is a joke. If this POS is voted in, there will be no one to blame other than Kalitta pilots.
The company played their cards correctly. Stalling and forcing us to deal with the NMB, knowing we won't get released. Anyone with a brain knows this contract is garbage. Unfortunately it will pass on the money alone.

Give it six months for everyone to realize what a mistake voting solely on one section of the contract really means.
Code Red is offline  
Old 11-28-2016, 11:31 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SVTCobra's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: B747-400 CA
Posts: 373
Default

Originally Posted by Code Red View Post
The company played their cards correctly. Stalling and forcing us to deal with the NMB, knowing we won't get released. Anyone with a brain knows this contract is garbage. Unfortunately it will pass on the money alone.

Give it six months for everyone to realize what a mistake voting solely on one section of the contract really means.
You know what they say about assuming.
SVTCobra is offline  
Old 11-28-2016, 11:56 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lockheed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 585
Default

Originally Posted by Code Red View Post
The company played their cards correctly. Stalling and forcing us to deal with the NMB, knowing we won't get released. Anyone with a brain knows this contract is garbage. Unfortunately it will pass on the money alone.

Give it six months for everyone to realize what a mistake voting solely on one section of the contract really means.
just a couple things that come to mind

business class travel - its my feeling we will be doing a lot more international positioning in the future

Travel bank - kind of complicated to go into - but most will earn $$ into their bank to be used how ever the pilot wants - ie 1st class on domestic flight ect

Scope - K4 would be unable to purchase another air carrier like Atlas has done with Southern - Integration is mandatory
If K4 is sold the Contract and pilots go with sale - not so today

Vacation - currently they can offer for bid how ever many weeks they want - TA says they must publish all vacation accrued - meaning say there are 100 Captains each with 3 weeks - they have to publish 300 weeks for the next year - today they do about 60% - also sizable increase in vacation bank

Sick - You call in sick for 5 days - go to work fly 64 or above -you are charged 1 sick day - you will not loose line holder status

Scheduling - if off your line you will be given a status upon arrival at hotel

Resident Airport - the company wanted badly to get rid of home basing

NO junior man - a pilot can never be forced to work 1 day of overtime - ever

Training - totally different - no more training failures held over your head

Hotels - must be in downtown or city center locations - no more looking at the jet from your room

16 days - how many guys reading this wish they only had to work 16 days out of 31 - with no forced OT

Furlough mitigation - if pilots on furlough - no OT can be flown - if furloughed 4 months pay

hours of service - several improvements including, if they change your departure time - mandatory 10 hours off prior to new departure

these are just a few of the things that come to mind
YOU may consider these improvements garbage
many of us however do not
Lockheed is offline  
Old 11-28-2016, 12:31 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by Lockheed View Post
just a couple things that come to mind

business class travel - its my feeling we will be doing a lot more international positioning in the future

Travel bank - kind of complicated to go into - but most will earn $$ into their bank to be used how ever the pilot wants - ie 1st class on domestic flight ect

Scope - K4 would be unable to purchase another air carrier like Atlas has done with Southern - Integration is mandatory
If K4 is sold the Contract and pilots go with sale - not so today

Vacation - currently they can offer for bid how ever many weeks they want - TA says they must publish all vacation accrued - meaning say there are 100 Captains each with 3 weeks - they have to publish 300 weeks for the next year - today they do about 60% - also sizable increase in vacation bank

Sick - You call in sick for 5 days - go to work fly 64 or above -you are charged 1 sick day - you will not loose line holder status

Scheduling - if off your line you will be given a status upon arrival at hotel

Resident Airport - the company wanted badly to get rid of home basing

NO junior man - a pilot can never be forced to work 1 day of overtime - ever

Training - totally different - no more training failures held over your head

Hotels - must be in downtown or city center locations - no more looking at the jet from your room

16 days - how many guys reading this wish they only had to work 16 days out of 31 - with no forced OT

Furlough mitigation - if pilots on furlough - no OT can be flown - if furloughed 4 months pay

hours of service - several improvements including, if they change your departure time - mandatory 10 hours off prior to new departure

these are just a few of the things that come to mind
YOU may consider these improvements garbage
many of us however do not
All these improvements you mention of I had at a regional carrier a decade ago. Just average pay and average work rules.

Mgmt bought everyone off with money. Maybe the next one will be better.

I'm not sorry for knowing we're all worth more.
Code Red is offline  
Old 11-28-2016, 12:39 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lockheed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 585
Default

Originally Posted by Code Red View Post
All these improvements you mention of I had at a regional carrier a decade ago. Just average pay and average work rules.

Mgmt bought everyone off with money. Maybe the next one will be better.

I'm not sorry for knowing we're all worth more.
so at your commuter they only charged you 1 sick day when took 5?
Lockheed is offline  
Old 11-28-2016, 12:43 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by Lockheed View Post
so at your commuter they only charged you 1 sick day when took 5?
We had a sick bank which accrued hours monthly. From which you could pay out at the end of the year.

I'm not saying I wanna go back to that job what I'm trying to show is perspective.
Code Red is offline  
Old 11-28-2016, 12:53 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SVTCobra's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: B747-400 CA
Posts: 373
Default

Originally Posted by Code Red View Post
We had a sick bank which accrued hours monthly. From which you could pay out at the end of the year.

I'm not saying I wanna go back to that job what I'm trying to show is perspective.
It's an obvious NO vote for you from the sounds of your so called perspective. Sounds like going back to a pax carrier is better suited to your standards.
SVTCobra is offline  
Old 11-28-2016, 12:53 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lockheed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 585
Default

Originally Posted by Code Red View Post
We had a sick bank which accrued hours monthly. From which you could pay out at the end of the year.

I'm not saying I wanna go back to that job what I'm trying to show is perspective.
I appreciate perspective - and please vote your gut
I also came from a far far better contract - but from where we are today with this contract negotiated by local 747 - and where we got to over 6 years of negotiations to me is not bad considering the environment that much of it was negotiated in

do wish it was better in a lot of ways - sure
understand many of these sections were TA'd years ago
Lockheed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
goldfinger
Kalitta Companies
6
01-27-2016 05:29 AM
jess
Cargo
10
02-22-2011 09:00 PM
BigjetLiljet
Part 135
1
10-22-2008 07:15 PM
iaflyer
Kalitta Companies
0
12-05-2007 11:56 AM
ghilis101
Kalitta Companies
64
04-09-2007 02:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices