Emirates Cuts Flights Due to Trump Policies
#21
You do realize that the ME3 aren't focused on serving their local populations, right? Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Qatar are ideal hubs, geographically speaking. I don't remember the exact number but I believe EK points to the fact that some X billion people live within 8 hours flying time of Dubai.
As the populations of Asia and Africa grow, their demand for air travel will only rise. There's no better hub location on Earth to connect those regions. And that's why these carriers exist.
As the populations of Asia and Africa grow, their demand for air travel will only rise. There's no better hub location on Earth to connect those regions. And that's why these carriers exist.
Yes I realize that and there is a substantial market to the areas you mentioned and may support a large fleet size if Africa and some Asian countries pull their economic and political heads out of their "south ends".
O/D traffic is important.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
You do realize that the ME3 aren't focused on serving their local populations, right? Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Qatar are ideal hubs, geographically speaking. I don't remember the exact number but I believe EK points to the fact that some X billion people live within 8 hours flying time of Dubai.
As the populations of Asia and Africa grow, their demand for air travel will only rise. There's no better hub location on Earth to connect those regions. And that's why these carriers exist.
As the populations of Asia and Africa grow, their demand for air travel will only rise. There's no better hub location on Earth to connect those regions. And that's why these carriers exist.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 840
#26
#27
Braniff, Eastern, People, & PanAm all did too. It was so substantial that none of them ever had to worry about their viability. None of the US carriers has ever had to face the specter of corporate raiders like Qatar, Etihad, and Emirates have, let alone the tragedy those 3 faced when hijackers flew their planes into those skyscrapers in Dubai and Abu Dhabi.
Thankfully, the coddled US airlines have always had the Sultan and the rest of the royal family here in America to protect us from foreign competition in our tiny nation.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,437
You do realize that the ME3 aren't focused on serving their local populations, right? Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Qatar are ideal hubs, geographically speaking. I don't remember the exact number but I believe EK points to the fact that some X billion people live within 8 hours flying time of Dubai.
As the populations of Asia and Africa grow, their demand for air travel will only rise. There's no better hub location on Earth to connect those regions. And that's why these carriers exist.
As the populations of Asia and Africa grow, their demand for air travel will only rise. There's no better hub location on Earth to connect those regions. And that's why these carriers exist.
It's still a flawed business plan that depends on filling seats on huge widebody aircraft and people willing to hub through that part of the world.
Agree that Africa is going to see a lot of growth, but how much of that is going to be long haul international? Not much.
Point to point is the future. The ULCC trans Atlantic bonanza that is starting up now is just the tip of the iceberg. Once enough 787s get out there, the hub and spoke model that they have gone all in on is going to be very challenging to maintain.
Airbus went big (literally and figuratively) with the 380. The fact that the ME3 are the only remaining orders and that the other airlines that did order them are struggling to utilize them economically is very telling.
I think we will see consolidation and the ME3 running like a business sooner than later.
#30
Compare those subsidies from the US Government to the US Government subsidies to DXB, AUH and DOH.
That's where the Billions are at.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post