Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
House vote to keep out Norwegian? >

House vote to keep out Norwegian?

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

House vote to keep out Norwegian?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2017, 08:17 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,040
Default

Originally Posted by Lemons View Post
Maybe you should do some research on the free market and you will see that the increase in wages that airlines have seen in the past few years are attributed to market forces. They are paying us more because they can and need to pay us more.

Public sector unions are both counter productive and damaging, just take a look at the situation Illinois is in. That's due to the fact that their public sector unions are entitled to massive pensions the state government can't pay. Public sector employees should be banned from joining unions. The easiest way to do that is to privatize their jobs to the lowest bidder.

Btw its gonna be 8 years, cupcake.
Subcontracting is killing the middle class. It is completely embarrassing to attack other people's way of life because you don't get what they get, even though they deserve it. Why don't you start lobbying to take away police, firefighters, and military pensions and survivor benefits because they are such an incredible leech to the system. "I get paid $300,000 a year and have to contribute to my OWN retirement fund. Everyone else needs a paycut too!!"

I say we make the richest pay more because they have unfairly taken most of the wage growth since the recession instead of deconstructing unions and stripping more middle class workers of retirement benefits.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 08:39 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Subcontracting is killing the middle class. It is completely embarrassing to attack other people's way of life because you don't get what they get, even though they deserve it. Why don't you start lobbying to take away police, firefighters, and military pensions and survivor benefits because they are such an incredible leech to the system. "I get paid $300,000 a year and have to contribute to my OWN retirement fund. Everyone else needs a paycut too!!"



I say we make the richest pay more because they have unfairly taken most of the wage growth since the recession instead of deconstructing unions and stripping more middle class workers of retirement benefits.

What makes anybody entitled to other people's money? I'm not for privatization of ATC but there is a credible argument to be made against public sector unions. That can be taken care of without privatizing something that is inherently governmental.
Nevjets is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 08:42 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 150
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Subcontracting is killing the middle class. It is completely embarrassing to attack other people's way of life because you don't get what they get, even though they deserve it. Why don't you start lobbying to take away police, firefighters, and military pensions and survivor benefits because they are such an incredible leech to the system. "I get paid $300,000 a year and have to contribute to my OWN retirement fund. Everyone else needs a paycut too!!"

I say we make the richest pay more because they have unfairly taken most of the wage growth since the recession instead of deconstructing unions and stripping more middle class workers of retirement benefits.
No one in the government should be getting a pension. Government pensions are the reasons for the financial ruin of cities and states.

Wealth is not part of a limited pie just because someone makes more money that doesn't mean someone else can't make more. Wealth is created.

Taxation is the reason why the middle-class is in ruin. Not just income tax but property taxes which are used to pay for the insane pensions of government workers.

Taxation is theft.
Lemons is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 09:32 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG View Post
Regarding NAI, I believe the bill only bans NEW flag of convenience carriers but doesn't remove NAI. Of course that portion of the bill could provide an opportunity to re-attack on NAI's original approval by the DOT.

Lee
That's fine, the threat isn't NAI itself, it's the precedent where any shady carrier like Air Asia etc. can build on NAI's business model.
C130driver is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 09:34 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by Lemons View Post
Maybe you should do some research on the free market and you will see that the increase in wages that airlines have seen in the past few years are attributed to market forces. They are paying us more because they can and need to pay us more.

Public sector unions are both counter productive and damaging, just take a look at the situation Illinois is in. That's due to the fact that their public sector unions are entitled to massive pensions the state government can't pay. Public sector employees should be banned from joining unions. The easiest way to do that is to privatize their jobs to the lowest bidder.

Btw its gonna be 8 years, cupcake.
Hahahha! I love when my Trump hating family / "friends" always say 4 years. Do they not understand how presidential terms work?
C130driver is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 09:46 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,542
Default

Also included in the bill...

One contentious issue is training requirements for pilots, and whether certain simulated training hours can be counted.
Thune said that two-thirds of U.S. airports are only served by regional carriers and that there is a "crisis" in trying to attract pilots, while Democrats said the revised rules could lead to unqualified pilots.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 09:55 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Default

Originally Posted by Lemons View Post
Btw its gonna be 8 years, cupcake.
No. It won't. Snowflake.

(See how I used your own dismissive buzzword to prove I am right?)
PasserOGas is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 10:01 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 150
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas View Post
No. It won't. Snowflake.

(See how I used your own dismissive buzzword to prove I am right?)
You're right more like 16 when you count president pence 8 years.
Lemons is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 11:04 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I say we make the richest pay more because they have unfairly taken most of the wage growth since the recession instead of deconstructing unions and stripping more middle class workers of retirement benefits.

In 2014, people with adjusted gross income, or AGI, above $250,000 paid just over half (51.6%) of all individual income taxes, though they accounted for only 2.7% of all returns filed, according to our analysis of preliminary IRS data. Their average tax rate (total taxes paid divided by cumulative AGI) was 25.7%. By contrast, people with incomes of less than $50,000 accounted for 62.3% of all individual returns filed, but they paid just 5.7% of total taxes. Their average tax rate was 4.3%.

Darn those pesky facts... seems we already do!
labbats is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 11:59 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 150
Default

Originally Posted by labbats View Post
In 2014, people with adjusted gross income, or AGI, above $250,000 paid just over half (51.6%) of all individual income taxes, though they accounted for only 2.7% of all returns filed, according to our analysis of preliminary IRS data. Their average tax rate (total taxes paid divided by cumulative AGI) was 25.7%. By contrast, people with incomes of less than $50,000 accounted for 62.3% of all individual returns filed, but they paid just 5.7% of total taxes. Their average tax rate was 4.3%.

Darn those pesky facts... seems we already do!
Rich already pay MORE than their fair share.

Mitt Romney was right with his 47% comment. Should make it so only tax payers can vote.
Lemons is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Purple Drank
Delta
145
03-18-2016 01:53 AM
slowplay
Major
4
06-26-2015 05:54 PM
BrownGirls YUM
Cargo
206
07-08-2008 08:32 PM
JetJock16
Regional
75
09-24-2007 03:24 PM
Gordon C
Major
0
06-25-2005 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices