Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
The Future Of Artificial Intelligence >

The Future Of Artificial Intelligence

Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

The Future Of Artificial Intelligence

Old 07-30-2017, 10:33 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by samsmug View Post
Agreed. Airline pilots will be obsolete in 10 years, possibly less. Cargo first, then passenger. It's going to happen faster than we want to admit.

Go learn to write 3d computing, machine learning or deep learning code.

We're talking about career paths on opposing trajectories...good luck whichever way you go.
And do not listen to a word this guy says. He's just bitter and hates his job. Go be a pilot, automation won't affect your career until maybe you are in your 60s, and that's a huge maybe. Seriously can anyone come up with a cogent point proving cost savings or an equal or better level of safety? No.
C130driver is offline  
Old 07-30-2017, 12:31 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Default

I remember seeing Rutan in an interview about aircraft automation a long time back.....

He put it well:

"Sure, we could fully automate airliners with technology we have right now..... But then one will screw up and fly into the Rose Bowl, and that's the last you'll ever see of that idea."
jcountry is offline  
Old 07-30-2017, 01:53 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry View Post
I remember seeing Rutan in an interview about aircraft automation a long time back.....

He put it well:

"Sure, we could fully automate airliners with technology we have right now..... But then one will screw up and fly into the Rose Bowl, and that's the last you'll ever see of that idea."
100% agree. The technology to gaurentee the same amount of safety (and with the majors it's the highest it could ever be,) just does not exist yet; neither does the cost savings. I'm sure pilots would have been eliminated years ago, but alas even cargo is flying 70s technology. Rest easy gents, barring Kim Jong Unstable going whazooo we are going to be gainfully employed for a while.
C130driver is offline  
Old 07-30-2017, 02:00 PM
  #94  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
And do not listen to a word this guy says. He's just bitter and hates his job. Go be a pilot, automation won't affect your career until maybe you are in your 60s, and that's a huge maybe. Seriously can anyone come up with a cogent point proving cost savings or an equal or better level of safety? No.
I agree, OP should be a recreational pilot if he likes flying. But I think he was asking about the potential for automation to replace airline/cargo pilots.

Math challenge accepted:

Pilots accounted for 9% of operating expenses in 2016 at AA, ~ $3B. Aircraft debt service was ~$200M in 2016. Even if we doubled the cost of aircraft to AA annually to $400M, to account for an automated airliner increase in cost, I think the numbers form a relatively cogent argument.

Of course there would be costs associated with improving infrastructure to allow automated cockpits, but when you save $2B+ annually, there's room to maneuver. And those added infrastructure costs, unlike salaries, can be amortized.
samsmug is offline  
Old 07-30-2017, 02:06 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,936
Default

Originally Posted by samsmug View Post
I agree, OP should be a recreational pilot if he likes flying. But I think he was asking about the potential for automation to replace airline/cargo pilots.

Math challenge accepted:

Pilots accounted for 9% of operating expenses in 2016 at AA, ~ $3B. Aircraft debt service was ~$200M in 2016. Even if we doubled the cost of aircraft to AA annually to $400M, to account for an automated airliner increase in cost, I think the numbers form a relatively cogent argument.

Of course there would be costs associated with improving infrastructure to allow automated cockpits, but when you save $2B+ annually, there's room to maneuver. And those added infrastructure costs, unlike salaries, can be amortized.
Aircraft debt. What do you think the debt would be if you parked all the current aircraft and then replaced every single one with pilotless aircraft? It would probably bankrupt the company. That and there isn't even remotely the infrastructure in place to remotely control any aircraft from an ATC perspective. I'm not saying it won't eventually be possible, but not during my career.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 07-30-2017, 05:55 PM
  #96  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by samsmug View Post
Agreed. Airline pilots will be obsolete in 10 years, possibly less. Cargo first, then passenger. It's going to happen faster than we want to admit.

Go learn to write 3d computing, machine learning or deep learning code.

We're talking about career paths on opposing trajectories...good luck whichever way you go.


Originally Posted by samsmug View Post
I'll concede that 10 years is likely to be the soonest we'll see automation of cockpits, but I stand by the sentiment of my post. Once a pilot is no longer needed, we are obsolete. Culture and politics will determine how fast we are out of work.

Automation is coming, it may be 10, 20, or 100 years away. Before it's a completed process, our profession may undergo significant changes in terms of QoL and compensation as a result of management's automation leverage.

Given the current trajectory of machine learning, I think the OP is taking on significant risk by investing in a long term airline career. I'd at least recommend having a backup plan in case this happens sooner than later.



That's some pretty serious back pedaling without the self awareness to realize it...
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 07-30-2017, 07:29 PM
  #97  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Aircraft debt. What do you think the debt would be if you parked all the current aircraft and then replaced every single one with pilotless aircraft? It would probably bankrupt the company. That and there isn't even remotely the infrastructure in place to remotely control any aircraft from an ATC perspective. I'm not saying it won't eventually be possible, but not during my career.
Can you elaborate on why you think an airline would go bankrupt by replacing aircraft?

I agree that there is work to be done in order to communicate with automated aircraft, (issues with ADS-B bandwidth and signal security come to mind). I think that we'll solve these type of infrastructure problems sooner than later.
samsmug is offline  
Old 07-30-2017, 07:52 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by samsmug View Post
I think that we'll solve these type of infrastructure problems sooner than later.
"We"? Dude I don't think many pilots are going to be trying to solve problems to increase the possibility of autonomous planes any time soon. Where I'm from that's called shooting yourself in the foot .
C130driver is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 05:33 AM
  #99  
Last To Know First To Go
 
TurboFanMan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 597
Default

We can't stop Iran from high jacking a drone. Remember, if it can be coded it can be broke. Now fill her up with friends and family, good luck with that!!
No thanks.......
TurboFanMan is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 09:49 AM
  #100  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Just think how pilots used to talk about flying in clouds, using autopilot or letting an airplane autoland. It is going to take awhile to get there, but I'm confident it will. Snow blocking the street lines, they can always put metal chips in the paint so cars stay in their lane using nfc type tech. Don't think for one second that a computer would be less capable of maintaining control in the snow. They have more sensitive sensors and just more data in general to let them know well before they start to skid. It's a matter of time. Start preparing yourself for it now.

Okay.. How about parallel parking in NYC?
kalipilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
FloridaGator
Hangar Talk
26
10-02-2008 10:24 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM
maximaman
Regional
31
09-03-2007 05:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices