Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
The Future Of Artificial Intelligence >

The Future Of Artificial Intelligence

Search
Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

The Future Of Artificial Intelligence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2019, 09:36 PM
  #271  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Single pilot throws out decades of knowledge about CRM
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 06-17-2019, 09:53 PM
  #272  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,724
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot View Post
Single pilot throws out decades of knowledge about CRM
Maybe not, if you have multiple personalities.
badflaps is offline  
Old 06-18-2019, 04:46 AM
  #273  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Pilot
Posts: 2,625
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
Anyone younger then 45 will probably see single pilot. Those just entering the industry will most likely be automated away at some point. I will seriously start to worry when FedEx and UPS go single pilot, we won't be far behind.

Looking at the avhearld site the vast majority of incidents are pilot induced today. Taking the pilot out of most operations will most likely improve safety. I know it sounds bad but the facts are the facts.

A lot of the CA's job is ensuring compliance with regulations, and interacting with all facets of the operation. I personally do not see that job function going away. It may, and the job description may well change from "pilot" to "flight ops coordinator". Who knows.

But so much of our industry still operates in a labor intensive fashion.
Nope, not even close.
Red Forman is offline  
Old 06-18-2019, 06:01 AM
  #274  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps View Post
Maybe not, if you have multiple personalities.
In that case, a second pilot is needed as referee.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 06-18-2019, 06:37 AM
  #275  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,267
Default

Originally Posted by Red Forman View Post
Nope, not even close.
Agreed. We are looking at, at best, decades of proof of concept studies, human factors studies, flight deck redesigns new regulations, new certification, new training (and all THAT comes with), and public acceptance.

That last one is going to take some time.
Poser765 is offline  
Old 06-18-2019, 10:31 AM
  #276  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

I have argued on this forum in the past that I believe the eventual direction we are headed is towards single pilot with remote backup.

However, what I think is one of the biggest speed bumps to our eventual job losses is simply the fact that the industry hasn't decided what path to take forward. Are we going single pilot with remote backup, or are we going fully remote operating, or are we going to make the huge leap to autonomous control?

In my mind, you can't even begin to discuss a timeline until we know where we are headed.

I am a huge automotive industry buff. I have very closely followed the path towards automation in cars. The one thing that I will point out is there are many baby steps along the way, followed by a single giant leap.

Baby steps have been occurring for a long time. Think, anti lock brakes, traction control, stability control. Then blind spot monitors, radar cruise control, automatic emergency brakes, and lane following. Currently, Teslas can change lanes on their own and even take highway off ramps.

Those are all accomplishments, but they are a long way from hundreds of cars perfectly merging on and off of freeways all by themselves. To have a computer system that is overseeing all traffic flow and controlling all vehicles speeds, and order of flow, is a huge hurdle and still a long long ways off.

My point is that there will be many further baby steps that will occur long before we are kicked to the curb. That being said, I'm still aggressively stashing cash in my 401k
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 06-18-2019, 11:38 AM
  #277  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 76
Default

there will be no need to learn the four forces of flight, or how a stall feels (because it won't happen)
What about AF447 ?
Arturito is offline  
Old 06-18-2019, 11:42 AM
  #278  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

I’m never going to get on a plane again if there aren’t any pilots.
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 06-18-2019, 11:54 AM
  #279  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Im just imagining the plantiffs filing aftet first hull loss.

Everbody...and i mean everbody that is even remotely involved is gona get tagged. The ac mfg. The airline. The atc system. All the way to the chip maker in the black boxes.

And i dont care what due diligence defense argument is made.....no jury of humans is gona buy it. And plantiffs counsel will have the infinite probability of human behavior as counter to any AI rationale.

Unless maybe by that time the jury is a bunch of AI droids.
BobZ is offline  
Old 06-18-2019, 12:27 PM
  #280  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,982
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ View Post
Im just imagining the plantiffs filing aftet first hull loss.

Everbody...and i mean everbody that is even remotely involved is gona get tagged. The ac mfg. The airline. The atc system. All the way to the chip maker in the black boxes.

And i dont care what due diligence defense argument is made.....no jury of humans is gona buy it. And plantiffs counsel will have the infinite probability of human behavior as counter to any AI rationale.

Unless maybe by that time the jury is a bunch of AI droids.
Every hull loss ends up in litigation now anyway. It's just an insurance/accounting/risk tolerance issue.

Sure a couple airplanes will crash due to some sort of automation failure, but I have a feeling the total accident rate will be lower making those losses acceptable. Also, the cost savings might even cover the insurance/litigation expenses!

I don't think this will happen quickly though due to regulatory hurdles and the initial outlay of capital it would take. So we're safe for now!

Droid Jury sounds terrifying though!!
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
FloridaGator
Hangar Talk
26
10-02-2008 10:24 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM
maximaman
Regional
31
09-03-2007 05:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices