Embraer "hopes" we cave on scope......
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 209
Embraer "hopes" we cave on scope......
And it starts/continues....
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...mits-f-440722/
NOPE, not even as a replacement one for one of the current allowed 170/175's or CRJ's.
They want them bad enough. We will fly them at the mainline and create more mainline jobs. 747 to J-3 cub. It should all be one list.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...mits-f-440722/
NOPE, not even as a replacement one for one of the current allowed 170/175's or CRJ's.
They want them bad enough. We will fly them at the mainline and create more mainline jobs. 747 to J-3 cub. It should all be one list.
#3
And it starts/continues....
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...mits-f-440722/
NOPE, not even as a replacement one for one of the current allowed 170/175's or CRJ's.
They want them bad enough. We will fly them at the mainline and create more mainline jobs. 747 to J-3 cub. It should all be one list.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...mits-f-440722/
NOPE, not even as a replacement one for one of the current allowed 170/175's or CRJ's.
They want them bad enough. We will fly them at the mainline and create more mainline jobs. 747 to J-3 cub. It should all be one list.
Ain't gunna happen.
#6
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 602
And it starts/continues....
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...mits-f-440722/
NOPE, not even as a replacement one for one of the current allowed 170/175's or CRJ's.
They want them bad enough. We will fly them at the mainline and create more mainline jobs. 747 to J-3 cub. It should all be one list.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...mits-f-440722/
NOPE, not even as a replacement one for one of the current allowed 170/175's or CRJ's.
They want them bad enough. We will fly them at the mainline and create more mainline jobs. 747 to J-3 cub. It should all be one list.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post