Future pilot movement at the majors.
#25
#26
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,157
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
As long as our government requires me to retire prior to my SS age, I'll advocate working to or at least past that age as it has a tendency to shift.
My retirement planning is fine, but many others were affected by the last decade. So, I have no problem raising the age, nor testing past a certain age. 50 sound good to you?
Just because the age will be raised to 67 doesn't mean you have to work until that age, nor does it mean if you work to that age you have to fly 90 hours a month like at SWA.
Personally, given how much you whine, I doubt you'll make it to 60, [EDITED FOR TOS]
My retirement planning is fine, but many others were affected by the last decade. So, I have no problem raising the age, nor testing past a certain age. 50 sound good to you?
Just because the age will be raised to 67 doesn't mean you have to work until that age, nor does it mean if you work to that age you have to fly 90 hours a month like at SWA.
Personally, given how much you whine, I doubt you'll make it to 60, [EDITED FOR TOS]
Last edited by rickair7777; 01-11-2018 at 10:41 AM. Reason: Quotes Deleted Post
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,422
We don’t have to work to retirement age but the age change certainly affects the buying power of our relative seniority. All those that rose to the top when it was 60 got 5 free years of seniority stolen from those behind them. Now you advocate that the rest of us gladly hand over more of our own relative seniority growth again?
Sorry
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post