Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Wet Sock Smell

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2018, 05:39 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
Most of the fume events aren’t a constant dirty sock smell. It seems to happen most at TOD but is never really a constant smell and comes about at various phases of flight. If it was dirty pack filters, it would be constant as long as air went thru the packs, IE as soon as the APU provides bleed air to the packs at the gate. If it smelled like dirty socks at the gate with the APU bleed on as soon as you get on the plane it should be written up and you should get off the plane until it’s fixed. If the smell comes at some later time, then it’s clearly not mold/dirty filters, as that would have been there earlier. So no, these fumes aren’t from moldy socks/filters.
Whenever I’ve had it at the tgate the APU was found to have a substantial oil leak. They burned the packs and MELd the APU
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 08-19-2018, 09:32 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,235
Default

Is the wet sock an issue on the 145, 175, and the 737? Seems to be an AB issue
SoFloFlyer is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 06:00 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer View Post
Is the wet sock an issue on the 145, 175, and the 737? Seems to be an AB issue
Any plane that uses bleed air for the packs can have it. My understanding is the 145 is a heavy offender. The 787 is the only airplane that doesn’t use bleed air
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 06:26 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot View Post
Any plane that uses bleed air for the packs can have it. My understanding is the 145 is a heavy offender. The 787 is the only airplane that doesn’t use bleed air
Early jets like the DC-8 used turbocompressors for the A/C packs, because they didn’t know if bleed air would be completely safe.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 09:08 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman View Post
Early jets like the DC-8 used turbocompressors for the A/C packs, because they didn’t know if bleed air would be completely safe.
Maybe we can go back to that.

Something really needs to be done.

Aircraft manufacturers have known about the oil risk for at least a few decades, and they have refused to take it seriously.

I have a feeling the courts will now punish them for that willful ignorance.
jcountry is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 02:36 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,235
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot View Post
Any plane that uses bleed air for the packs can have it. My understanding is the 145 is a heavy offender. The 787 is the only airplane that doesn’t use bleed air
Where do the packs run off on the 787?
SoFloFlyer is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 03:01 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,205
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer View Post
Where do the packs run off on the 787?
Electrically driven compressors.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 07:24 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,580
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry View Post
Maybe we can go back to that.

Something really needs to be done.

Aircraft manufacturers have known about the oil risk for at least a few decades, and they have refused to take it seriously.

I have a feeling the courts will now punish them for that willful ignorance.
I was on the 757/767 for eight years and often, when shutting down an engine while taxiing in, I’d get a dose of atomized fuel...or some other toxin, through the packs. I’ve been on the airbus for 2 years and I’ve only smelled what I’d call a dirty sock smell once. It was at JFK and the APU was running and the packs were supplying air....the winds were howling sideways across the aircraft and I think the APU exhaust was being ingested on the downwind side and being sent into the cabin. It was mildly irritating to my nose and as soon as a flight attendant complained, I turned the downwind pack off and the smell dissipated after a few minutes.

I don’t know about the rest of you guys but I went from not having any allergies, 10-15 years ago, to now, having pretty bad allergies, and not only seasonally. I feel like I come to work fine, and uncongested, and after a day or two at work, my nose is running, my eyes dry out occasionally...I can live with it but it’s not pleasant. In the spring and the fall, it’s a lot worse. I missed 3 weeks of work last February when, on a trip, during a red eye, my ear started acting up. I went home sick and went to quick care. I had a sinus infection, two ear infections and strep. It took three weeks before I could get the pressure to equalize in my ear.

My Primary care Doc has Told me about several AMA articles he’s read regarding the atomized fuel being inhaled by passengers and the studies and tests they’ve done on how harmful it is. Once it just an irritant, but over time, it can cause permanent damage.

All I can say is, I’m glad I’ve got a huge life insurance policy, cause I don’t know if I’ll live long enough to see my kids off to college.

Edit: I just read my entire post and realize I jumped around a lot with the issues I’ve had lately and I’m not blaming strep or the ear infections on the dirty sock smell...I’ve just been getting sick a lot more over the past 5-10 years, and I’m concerned about the health implications of all the crap we are exposed to. I was on the 757/767 for a majority of that time too. Maybe I’m just getting old and that’s why I’m getting sick more often...I don’t know.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 08-22-2018, 07:50 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 258
Default

I was talking to a crew about this a few days ago actually, bought up the Spirit pilot who died due to it and that now whenever they get the smell they divert immediately. And if the crew is breathing that stuff in imagine what the folks in back are breathing in, especially the elderly.
TCASTESTOK is offline  
Old 09-05-2018, 12:15 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TrojanCMH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,269
Default

Had one going into Seattle a while back. Raining hard, moderate turbulence. Got the sock smell on the downwind. They tried to “burn it out of the packs” by running the engines up with the packs on. Maintenance brought plane back, we boarded with APU on and no issues. When we pushed back and started it reeked of the sock smell. Returned to the gate. One of the FAs was pregnant and said she didn’t want to get back on plane. We agreed, told dispatch we weren’t accepting the plane. They cancelled the flight. Moral is I don’t think it has to do with the pack filters being dirty as it was fine running off the APU.

Something isn’t right... We are getting new super fancy filters that supposedly filter out the fine particulates though so that’s nice. I flew the 145 for a decade and I smelt that all the time and just thought it was a moldy filter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TrojanCMH is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Merica
FedEx
1
11-22-2016 03:37 PM
CloudSailor
FedEx
111
02-03-2016 06:59 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
11
07-31-2010 04:57 AM
MoneyMan
Cargo
1
03-08-2009 01:44 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
4
05-04-2006 06:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices