![[Breeze] Airways](/iconimages/breeze/breeze-airways_ltr.gif)
[Breeze] Airways
05-12-2021, 06:05 AM
#1121
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Trying not to crash
Posts: 1,260
Originally Posted by DHC8DRV
It is based on wing span and tail height. Do you guys ever read the text of a NOTAM? For example, a taxiway will be closed to Group III or larger aircraft. Most times they also include the wingspan limits but not always and then you must know what Group number your aircraft is in.
https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/...ive-201705.pdf
https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/...ive-201705.pdf
Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk
05-12-2021, 06:53 AM
#1123
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,244
Originally Posted by BobbyLeeSwagger
I'm sorry I brought up these groups from the job posting. Are we at the point in the thread where we derail into politics yet?
................
05-12-2021, 08:47 AM
#1124
Covfefe
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Originally Posted by detpilot
This document is 300 pages long, and a ctrl+f wasn't helpful. Do you have a concise reference that defines group numbers? I haven't had a practical need for this info in my 12 years of transport and large military aircraft, but that doesn't mean I won't tomorrow.
Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk
doesn’t copy and paste well though
05-12-2021, 10:14 AM
#1125
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,244
Part 121 uses Group I & II differently, these definitions need to be used in the proper context...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/121.400
Pretty sure the job requirements refer to the 121 definition (jets).
Otherwise they are limiting their applicants to only people who have thousands of hours in a *very* specific subset of small-ish aircraft (aircraft design group II).
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/121.400
Pretty sure the job requirements refer to the 121 definition (jets).
Otherwise they are limiting their applicants to only people who have thousands of hours in a *very* specific subset of small-ish aircraft (aircraft design group II).
05-12-2021, 12:51 PM
#1127
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 846
Originally Posted by rickair7777
Part 121 uses Group I & II differently, these definitions need to be used in the proper context...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/121.400
Pretty sure the job requirements refer to the 121 definition (jets).
Otherwise they are limiting their applicants to only people who have thousands of hours in a *very* specific subset of small-ish aircraft (aircraft design group II).
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/121.400
Pretty sure the job requirements refer to the 121 definition (jets).
Otherwise they are limiting their applicants to only people who have thousands of hours in a *very* specific subset of small-ish aircraft (aircraft design group II).
05-12-2021, 01:10 PM
#1128
Covfefe
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Originally Posted by Tpinks
it’s literally defined right on the job description what they mean by group II aircraft. If they can’t understand that, I don’t think they will need to worry about the job.
05-12-2021, 04:16 PM
#1129
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 407
Originally Posted by BobbyLeeSwagger
I'm sorry I brought up these groups from the job posting. Are we at the point in the thread where we derail into politics yet?
05-13-2021, 04:54 AM
#1130
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,544
Originally Posted by ElCaribe
My “wing mounted engine” joke went way over everyone’s heads apparently.
You were correct though, under-wing mounted engine time is the most important logbook statistic only beaten by over-wing mounted engine time. And glider time, but only because those things are powered by magic.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
