Search
Notices

[Breeze] Airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2021, 05:10 PM
  #1831  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville View Post
I'm home every night at allegiant. Do a little industry research.
and how were the wages at Allegiant IN THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS of operation? 🤔

Inquiring minds wanna know..
fastneat is offline  
Old 10-08-2021, 05:12 PM
  #1832  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by MartyM View Post
To me Breeze is a regional since it pays like a regional. If someone wants to go there to build up time and bounce, cool. If they want to go to a different regional to build up time and bounce, cool. If they want to stay, there's probably a reason other than finances for them to stay, like QOL, family, can't move, etc. If they want to go there, I don't care, it doesn't bother me. Why some are getting so worked up about what other people choose to do, is beyond me. If you don't like it, don't go. My body, my choice! Wait, different discussion...
^ gets it. 👍
fastneat is offline  
Old 10-08-2021, 05:17 PM
  #1833  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
Tech startups fail a lot as well. They don’t always turn into Google or Facebook or Twitter. It’s always a gamble. But with an airline like breeze set to grow from nothing to a 100-150 airplane company in 5ish years, that valuation will potentially grow rapidly. And it isn’t really a financial plan, it’s more of part of the risk/reward equation for going to a startup (along with seniority), and a monetary one that *may* compensate for initial low wages. The idea with the airline startup paying in equity is to have it long enough for the airline to go public, still in growth stage, at which point you have the option to cash out (or hold, I guess, but holding stock long term in the company you work for isn’t a great idea). That was one reason B6 got away with low wages initially, and some of those guys made out really well (some didn’t). It’s just something like profit sharing in that that isn’t guaranteed to pay out, but can move the needle in getting people in the door, and is an IOU of sorts, not really a scheme or promise that the stock will go parabolic and get rich…just something additional on top of and to partially make up for initial low wages.

I’d cut the breeze guys more slack if this were the case. Instead, they got a chance to put their own money into the company. Which is insanity when you think about it. It’s one thing to receive equity as compensation, but when you have to pay your own money, while already being underpaid, to invest in an airline startup at which you work…yikes.

Sir, may I make a statement? I have a pilot friend at Breeze who bought in in August 2020. Ten months later when they released B shares, his initial investment at Breeze was valued at 5x. (on top of his options..)

he's pretty good with it.
fastneat is offline  
Old 10-08-2021, 06:24 PM
  #1834  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by fastneat View Post
Sir, may I make a statement? I have a pilot friend at Breeze who bought in in August 2020. Ten months later when they released B shares, his initial investment at Breeze was valued at 5x. (on top of his options..)

he's pretty good with it.
Until it’s publicly traded, it’s kind of hard to place a valuation on the company. And that 5x was based on a basically self-proclaimed 1.5bn valuation if I’m not mistaken. Pretty aggressive if you ask me. I’m not saying that early investors won’t do well. It probably will. I’m not arguing the merits of an investment in breeze. I am arguing that they are underpaying, and as a start up, ought to at least be providing equity in the company to compensate for low wages and poor work rules. But, no real reason to do it when “it’s better than my regional, barely” keeps classes full, and attrition doesn’t cancel flights or cost more money in hiring/training than paying enough to keep people.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 10-08-2021, 07:20 PM
  #1835  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chihuahua's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 421
Default

It appears that Breeze has changed their new hire vaccination policy. At least they've taken a step in the right direction on this one.
chihuahua is offline  
Old 10-08-2021, 07:24 PM
  #1836  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,066
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
Until it’s publicly traded, it’s kind of hard to place a valuation on the company. And that 5x was based on a basically self-proclaimed 1.5bn valuation if I’m not mistaken. Pretty aggressive if you ask me. I’m not saying that early investors won’t do well. It probably will. I’m not arguing the merits of an investment in breeze. I am arguing that they are underpaying, and as a start up, ought to at least be providing equity in the company to compensate for low wages and poor work rules. But, no real reason to do it when “it’s better than my regional, barely” keeps classes full, and attrition doesn’t cancel flights or cost more money in hiring/training than paying enough to keep people.
it isn’t “self-declared”. Valuations are based on what other internal investors paid for in the subsequent round. And it isn’t just friends and family. There is some real money behind it.

it isn’t liquid but it also isn’t a scam either.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 10-08-2021, 07:59 PM
  #1837  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD View Post
it isn’t “self-declared”. Valuations are based on what other internal investors paid for in the subsequent round. And it isn’t just friends and family. There is some real money behind it.

it isn’t liquid but it also isn’t a scam either.
No. That’s not how valuation of a private company works. You have it backwards. What other investors pay in private company funding rounds is based on the “valuation” and price per share set by the company for that round of funding, and finding those willing to pay the company’s set price for the shares. It isn’t like a public market where there are buyers and sellers setting the price with a bid/ask. Neeleman says hey, we are worth 1.5bn based on my business plan and estimated cash flow projected over the next few years. Here’s ____ number of shares you can buy for ____ price based on this valuation. He phones his PE/HF buddies, they throw down their wads of cash, as well as accredited friends/family/employees at various stages/funding rounds, and again, that’s at the price they set, not at a negotiated or market price (because there is no market, as breeze BOD/mgmt sets that price).

You could say that retrospectively, since banks, PE firms, and people paid ____ per share, the company is therefore worth that price per share for the total number of shares. But, that’s not really a true valuation of the company. This exact discussion was had in one of their interviews/company presentations, and was cited as one of the main reasons why they didn’t want to offer equity—they stated that it gets too muddy with valuations when people want to sell if the company hasn’t IPOd yet.

And last, nobody that I’ve seen in this thread, including me, has said it was a scam, or that there wasn’t real money behind it. $200+ million obviously didn’t come from friends and family, and anyone with that kind of money likely isn’t throwing it on the table without some serious due diligence. Gotta separate the investment thesis/business stuff from pilot compensation. The former is (likely) solid. The latter is not. My argument is that there should be overlap between the two—as compensation ought to include a chunk of the financial risk of going to a startup that underpays via equity that, if successful, will make up for it. But, it doesn’t. Unless you put your own money into it. But that isn’t compensation. That’s an investment, and an entirely different discussion.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 10-08-2021, 08:33 PM
  #1838  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville View Post
Would you also cross a picket line because you feel its the right move for you? Same mentality. Greed and selfishness, with a complete lack of sense of community. SCAB mentality.
How many have put you on their no fly list..........you must be fun to fly with.
AUpilot75 is offline  
Old 10-08-2021, 11:03 PM
  #1839  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,066
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
No. That’s not how valuation of a private company works. You have it backwards. What other investors pay in private company funding rounds is based on the “valuation” and price per share set by the company for that round of funding, and finding those willing to pay the company’s set price for the shares. It isn’t like a public market where there are buyers and sellers setting the price with a bid/ask. Neeleman says hey, we are worth 1.5bn based on my business plan and estimated cash flow projected over the next few years. Here’s ____ number of shares you can buy for ____ price based on this valuation. He phones his PE/HF buddies, they throw down their wads of cash, as well as accredited friends/family/employees at various stages/funding rounds, and again, that’s at the price they set, not at a negotiated or market price (because there is no market, as breeze BOD/mgmt sets that price).

You could say that retrospectively, since banks, PE firms, and people paid ____ per share, the company is therefore worth that price per share for the total number of shares. But, that’s not really a true valuation of the company. This exact discussion was had in one of their interviews/company presentations, and was cited as one of the main reasons why they didn’t want to offer equity—they stated that it gets too muddy with valuations when people want to sell if the company hasn’t IPOd yet.

And last, nobody that I’ve seen in this thread, including me, has said it was a scam, or that there wasn’t real money behind it. $200+ million obviously didn’t come from friends and family, and anyone with that kind of money likely isn’t throwing it on the table without some serious due diligence. Gotta separate the investment thesis/business stuff from pilot compensation. The former is (likely) solid. The latter is not. My argument is that there should be overlap between the two—as compensation ought to include a chunk of the financial risk of going to a startup that underpays via equity that, if successful, will make up for it. But, it doesn’t. Unless you put your own money into it. But that isn’t compensation. That’s an investment, and an entirely different discussion.

I understand how private companies are valued. And all I was responding to is the notion that the 1.5B valuation is somehow pulled out of thin air.

That valuation was subject to some scrutiny by sophisticated investors. So it isn’t just Neeleman making stuff up but also others - sophisticated PE firms - buying it. And they don’t do it for some charitable reason but believe that they can make money at it.

is it worth 1.5B or just 1B - who knows? But someone believes that they can make a serious return on it - and serious being 30-40% p.a. for this kind of investment risk. That’s all what matters.

Should it be part of pilot compensation? Nobody is forced to work there or to buy shares. It’s a creative way on playing on people’s hopes and dreams. But everyone has to do their own due diligence.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 10-08-2021, 11:08 PM
  #1840  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
Until it’s publicly traded, it’s kind of hard to place a valuation on the company. And that 5x was based on a basically self-proclaimed 1.5bn valuation if I’m not mistaken. Pretty aggressive if you ask me. I’m not saying that early investors won’t do well. It probably will. I’m not arguing the merits of an investment in breeze. I am arguing that they are underpaying, and as a start up, ought to at least be providing equity in the company to compensate for low wages and poor work rules. But, no real reason to do it when “it’s better than my regional, barely” keeps classes full, and attrition doesn’t cancel flights or cost more money in hiring/training than paying enough to keep people.

Fair enough. Although Black Rock saw something significant in Breeze to inject 200M, so they must also see something there, too, to make that big of an investment, thereby validating the "arbitrary" valuation.

But there's another non tangible that no one here talks about, and that is, most people who are here ACTUALLY love coming to work! It's actually a good feeling when the customers consistently, and i'm not over stating this, but over and over again, they THANK our crews for the nice experience. Just today I was having a conversation with a couple in row 1... I'll say again... HAVING A CONVERSATION with our customers ... and they jokingly asked if we two pilots were the pilots or if we were the on board entertainment?.. (translation.. they were complimenting us for sharing our personalities with them and the whole aircraft. because that is our norm)

How many of you, especially those who keep placing such a focus on money, how many of you can say that your crews and your customers enjoy their flights, express that they enjoy their flights, and enjoy eachother on a crew, as a matter of rule rather than as an exception? How much is THAT worth to you?

Would making more money be better? Of course it would. Does it define my overall satisfaction in my job? Nope. Maslow's hierarchy spells that out for us. If I learned anything coming out of Covid, I learned that life is, can be, could be, IS short. Enjoy every minute of it. Making "industry standard" does not a better life make.

Last edited by fastneat; 10-08-2021 at 11:52 PM.
fastneat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
Drums4life
Regional
107
08-16-2011 11:21 PM
ryane946
Major
25
03-06-2007 08:53 PM
RedBaron007
Major
3
01-31-2007 09:05 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices