Search
Notices

[Breeze] Airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2020, 07:11 PM
  #651  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 67
Default

I interviewed and was put in the pool before Covid. Last I heard they're still mostly on track for certification. With FAA working at home things have slowed down a bit but they're still pushing for fall.
schlittykess is offline  
Old 05-09-2020, 07:14 PM
  #652  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 529
Default

Originally Posted by schlittykess View Post
I interviewed and was put in the pool before Covid. Last I heard they're still mostly on track for certification. With FAA working at home things have slowed down a bit but they're still pushing for fall.
What's your experience level if you don't mind me asking?
TimetoClimb is offline  
Old 05-09-2020, 07:17 PM
  #653  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 67
Default

Originally Posted by TimetoClimb View Post
What's your experience level if you don't mind me asking?
4600TT 1300TPIC. Also all TPIC was E175 which they were looking for since they're launching with E190
schlittykess is offline  
Old 05-09-2020, 08:10 PM
  #654  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 380
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Possible if the economy is totally devastated beyond any hope of return to pre-COVID normals.

If we revert to a third-world economy, with legacies liquidated, maybe business travelers and upper-middle class will have no choice but to fly ULCCs.

But if things return to mostly normal, people will fly the same airlines they've always flown.
You’re forgetting the fact the big 3 will be significantly smaller on the other side of this. Someone will be there to take advantage.
Notarealpilot is offline  
Old 05-09-2020, 09:52 PM
  #655  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,503
Default

Originally Posted by Notarealpilot View Post
Why do you think this won’t cause Frontier and Spirit to blow up and take over market share for the exact same reasons above? Other than a few differences I think they have a way better shot at taking advantage of this situation. I’m biased because I work for one but my money’s on the current ULCCs.
i didn’t say they wouldn’t. If you followed my other posts, I think the legacies will be hurt fairly badly if international flying doesn’t rebound quickly, even (and perhaps especially) if domestic does. Too many fleet types and too much seniority in the international wide-body equipment will turn furloughing the junior people into an atrociously expensive training cascade for those not furloughed. And clearly, F9 and NK can also benefit from the used aircraft market, dumping (Or at least renegotiating downward) leases on older 319/320/321 CEOs and picking up slightly used NEOs to replace them. And - like Breeze - they too will benefit from cheap fuel, unused gates, and a plethora of easy to recruit pilots out there.

But Breeze is still going to have an advantage in lower employee costs - at least initially - because literally EVERYBODY will be a newbie on year one of the salary schedule while - even if NK and F9 don’t wind up furloughing they still both have people onboard who have been there long enough to work their way up the payscale. Even so, if you look at the furloughing that AA and UAL will have to do if international flying doesn’t come back promptly, they well might wind up with no one avoiding furlough who ISN’T At year 12 on longevity.

but yeah, I imagine right now the Big Three CEOs are having nightmares about NK and F9 and Breeze and SWA siphoning off domestic market share while they are still having to type rate 777 and 787 pilots and FOs (Many whose last previous type rating was a 727) into their narrow body domestic fleet.

And probably their very WORST nightmare would be an NK F9 merger with all future orders converted to 321Neo XLR so they could steal market share domestically AND internationally.

But since it was a Breeze thread, I didn’t really go into that in my previous posting...
Excargodog is online now  
Old 05-10-2020, 12:00 AM
  #656  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 537
Default

Breeze also planned on zero revenue during their current startup timeframe. In other words, they aren’t losing any money now due to covid that they didn’t plan to lose already, whereas every other airline (incl NK/F9) is losing billions with parked and/or empty planes and idle pilots with no revenue coming in, and amassing huge debt, which will cost money to service (raising their overall costs down the road). Besides the handful of initial cadre and DECs on year 3/2 pay, as stated above, everyone will be on year 1 pay. And the pay scales/401k are hot garbage. Barely higher than regional pay scales. E195 pay a little over half of JB E190 pay, and A220 pay a little over half of JB A220 pay when you factor in 401k. And...now they have thousands of apps on file (even pre-covid they had a ton). So there is no pressure to raise the pay now, or worry about turnover for guys going to legacies (saving training costs). One guy I know in the pool there was planning on bouncing to any of the big 3/SWA/AS/B6/G4 even if he had a single or low digit seniority number at Breeze. Not anymore. Even if he wanted to leave, doubtful anyone will be hiring in the next couple years. I’m sure he isn’t the only one, so Breeze dodged a huge bullet there. Whereas it was going to be a stepping stone, even with the allure of getting in on the ground floor, now it’s not...at least for a couple/few years.



Also, as a startup, they can build their systems from the ground up, which enables a lot more efficiency. I’m also guessing they can negotiate a lot of things at a discount right now, between lease/finance rates, contract employees, GSE, etc.



Taking a look at the allegiant thread, they are in contraction mode. Breeze’s network guy came from there, so I have to think he will be able to capitalize on that, as well as newfound availability to access some other gates/slots that wouldn’t have otherwise been available. Before, Breeze said they weren’t going to fly any routes that had competition (largely knowing that the Goliaths like delta would lose money to bleed them out if they did). But now every airline is in survival mode, so there likely won’t be much of a competitive response against Breeze. No one can afford to do it. So perhaps they don’t just go for allegiant style routes now...and maybe they won’t avoid competition as hard as they were before.



Minus not selling his stake in TAP when he was trying to and subsequently losing his a$$ with a margin call, by sheer luck Neeleman’s timing is perfect here, assuming demand comes back and he’s able to hit markets that work. He will have a tremendous cost advantage with dirt cheap E195 leases from Azul, cheap pilots, cheap fuel, cheap everything really, probably a good onboard product, pilots and FAs just happy to have a job with a fun startup culture, as well as having charter flights (unless college sports stop next year) securing revenue even if leisure demand is still down when they launch.



Just as the post-9/11 times with hurting legacies allowed JB to grow and access a lot of prime markets, I think this virus has enabled a very rare jetblue 2.0 type of opportunity.
copy is offline  
Old 05-10-2020, 06:27 AM
  #657  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,128
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Possible if the economy is totally devastated beyond any hope of return to pre-COVID normals.

If we revert to a third-world economy, with legacies liquidated, maybe business travelers and upper-middle class will have no choice but to fly ULCCs.

But if things return to mostly normal, people will fly the same airlines they've always flown.
It looks like Parker is betting that the dramatic pullback by both UAL and DAL will open market share to AA and make the retaining of an extra 1,000 plus pilots over the winter be worthwhile.... plus there will likely be endless AA advertisements how they didn't furlough anybody like everybody else... "the company that cares," ya can almost hear the background music now....
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 05-10-2020, 06:53 AM
  #658  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,870
Default

If they keep offering LOAs we won’t be fat pilots at all next year. May & June over 5000 pilots are only making 55 hr voluntarily
AllYourBaseAreB is offline  
Old 05-10-2020, 07:16 AM
  #659  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,284
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
It looks like Parker is betting that the dramatic pullback by both UAL and DAL will open market share to AA and make the retaining of an extra 1,000 plus pilots over the winter be worthwhile.... plus there will likely be endless AA advertisements how they didn't furlough anybody like everybody else... "the company that cares," ya can almost hear the background music now....
He seems to be going out on a limb... if things pick up, he wins. If they don't it was probably BK anyway.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-10-2020, 11:36 AM
  #660  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GuppyPuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: JetRight, JetLeft
Posts: 760
Default

Originally Posted by copy View Post
Breeze also planned on zero revenue during their current startup timeframe. In other words, they aren’t losing any money now due to covid that they didn’t plan to lose already, whereas every other airline (incl NK/F9) is losing billions with parked and/or empty planes and idle pilots with no revenue coming in, and amassing huge debt, which will cost money to service (raising their overall costs down the road). Besides the handful of initial cadre and DECs on year 3/2 pay, as stated above, everyone will be on year 1 pay. And the pay scales/401k are hot garbage. Barely higher than regional pay scales. E195 pay a little over half of JB E190 pay, and A220 pay a little over half of JB A220 pay when you factor in 401k. And...now they have thousands of apps on file (even pre-covid they had a ton). So there is no pressure to raise the pay now, or worry about turnover for guys going to legacies (saving training costs). One guy I know in the pool there was planning on bouncing to any of the big 3/SWA/AS/B6/G4 even if he had a single or low digit seniority number at Breeze. Not anymore. Even if he wanted to leave, doubtful anyone will be hiring in the next couple years. I’m sure he isn’t the only one, so Breeze dodged a huge bullet there. Whereas it was going to be a stepping stone, even with the allure of getting in on the ground floor, now it’s not...at least for a couple/few years.



Also, as a startup, they can build their systems from the ground up, which enables a lot more efficiency. I’m also guessing they can negotiate a lot of things at a discount right now, between lease/finance rates, contract employees, GSE, etc.



Taking a look at the allegiant thread, they are in contraction mode. Breeze’s network guy came from there, so I have to think he will be able to capitalize on that, as well as newfound availability to access some other gates/slots that wouldn’t have otherwise been available. Before, Breeze said they weren’t going to fly any routes that had competition (largely knowing that the Goliaths like delta would lose money to bleed them out if they did). But now every airline is in survival mode, so there likely won’t be much of a competitive response against Breeze. No one can afford to do it. So perhaps they don’t just go for allegiant style routes now...and maybe they won’t avoid competition as hard as they were before.



Minus not selling his stake in TAP when he was trying to and subsequently losing his a$$ with a margin call, by sheer luck Neeleman’s timing is perfect here, assuming demand comes back and he’s able to hit markets that work. He will have a tremendous cost advantage with dirt cheap E195 leases from Azul, cheap pilots, cheap fuel, cheap everything really, probably a good onboard product, pilots and FAs just happy to have a job with a fun startup culture, as well as having charter flights (unless college sports stop next year) securing revenue even if leisure demand is still down when they launch.



Just as the post-9/11 times with hurting legacies allowed JB to grow and access a lot of prime markets, I think this virus has enabled a very rare jetblue 2.0 type of opportunity.
Excellent summation.

Gup
GuppyPuppy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
Drums4life
Regional
107
08-16-2011 11:21 PM
ryane946
Major
25
03-06-2007 08:53 PM
RedBaron007
Major
3
01-31-2007 09:05 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices