Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Airbus to end A380 production >

Airbus to end A380 production

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Airbus to end A380 production

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2019, 07:10 AM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer View Post
Probably reused as a cargo once emirates sells them. They love cheap used planes.
Don't know if it's readily convertible to cargo. The problem would be the two decks... both would likely need to be reinforced, and both would need cargo access doors. No way it would be economical to fly that form drag around with the top deck empty.

About guaranteed that AB will not develop/certify cargo mods, so some aftermarket shop would have to do it. Too small of a fleet also.

Also AB probably wants all of these things in the recycling shredder as quickly as it can be arranged. They've already lost $25B+, and everything they do related to the 380 loses more money. The fleet only reached a small fraction of their hoped-for market segment, and the support overhead will be bleeding red ink until they park the last one (ala Beech Starship).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 07:57 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,909
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Don't know if it's readily convertible to cargo. The problem would be the two decks... both would likely need to be reinforced, and both would need cargo access doors. No way it would be economical to fly that form drag around with the top deck empty.

About guaranteed that AB will not develop/certify cargo mods, so some aftermarket shop would have to do it. Too small of a fleet also.

Also AB probably wants all of these things in the recycling shredder as quickly as it can be arranged. They've already lost $25B+, and everything they do related to the 380 loses more money. The fleet only reached a small fraction of their hoped-for market segment, and the support overhead will be bleeding red ink until they park the last one (ala Beech Starship).
Interesting to know if the engineers performed a study to see if upper deck were removed... with a swing-tail installation to see if it would be viable competitor of the An-124, which is about the same length of the A-380.
captjns is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 08:14 AM
  #13  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
Interesting to know if the engineers performed a study to see if upper deck were removed... with a swing-tail installation to see if it would be viable competitor of the An-124, which is about the same length of the A-380.
A380 fuselage is largely carbon fiber... I don't think that's as easy to modify as a conventional aluminum structure. Their "beluga" parts carriers are based on older types, probably for that reason.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 08:18 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Lots of possibilities for a beached leviathan:

https://www.cheapflightsfinder.com/b...tired-airplane
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 08:38 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 101
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Don't know if it's readily convertible to cargo. The problem would be the two decks... both would likely need to be reinforced, and both would need cargo access doors. No way it would be economical to fly that form drag around with the top deck empty.

About guaranteed that AB will not develop/certify cargo mods, so some aftermarket shop would have to do it. Too small of a fleet also.

Also AB probably wants all of these things in the recycling shredder as quickly as it can be arranged. They've already lost $25B+, and everything they do related to the 380 loses more money. The fleet only reached a small fraction of their hoped-for market segment, and the support overhead will be bleeding red ink until they park the last one (ala Beech Starship).
I may be wrong, but I seem to recall Fedex had an order for the 380. They cancelled the order when production delays mounted.
RSRVWINDSURFR is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 08:47 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Speedbird2263's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 705
Default

Sad to see it go, from a passenger standpoint, IMO it is by far and away the most comfortable and quiet aircraft I've ever had the pleasure to fly on. The sheer engineering advances pioneered by the A380 will undoubtedly make their way on future products, as has already been seen on the A350 et al.
Speedbird2263 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 08:53 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Speedbird2263's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by RSRVWINDSURFR View Post
I may be wrong, but I seem to recall Fedex had an order for the 380. They cancelled the order when production delays mounted.
You're on the money, both FedEx and UPS had orders. The A380 was never a true contender for heavy cargo applications like the 747 & 777 were and still are. As I understand it they were passable for package(volume limited) applications due to low floor loading specifications and to strengthen the floors further would add weight to an already weight challenged airframe. (One of the reasons the A380 has only inboard T/Rs and brakes on only 2 of the 3 axles for the inboard main body gear.)
Speedbird2263 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:17 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Originally Posted by Speedbird2263 View Post
You're on the money, both FedEx and UPS had orders. The A380 was never a true contender for heavy cargo applications like the 747 & 777 were and still are. As I understand it they were passable for package(volume limited) applications due to low floor loading specifications and to strengthen the floors further would add weight to an already weight challenged airframe. (One of the reasons the A380 has only inboard T/Rs and brakes on only 2 of the 3 axles for the inboard main body gear.)
Didn’t fedex even build a hangar for one?
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:21 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Speedbird2263's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer View Post
Didn’t fedex even build a hangar for one?
Of that I’m not sure but I wouldn’t be surprised if they had.
Speedbird2263 is offline  
Old 02-15-2019, 05:04 AM
  #20  
On Reserve
 
MaddDogg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD11
Posts: 14
Default

FedEx did have the A380 on order. But, with endless delays on delivery dates and charted available versus required lift expected to cross, the order was canceled and the company went with the 777.
IIRC the main differences between the cargo and pax versions were a slightly lowered upper deck, where the carbon fiber was replaced with aluminum, and a steerable aft main body gear.
The hangar is a fact.
MaddDogg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
antiguogrumete
Your Photos and Videos
0
12-19-2018 11:49 PM
antiguogrumete
Your Photos and Videos
2
09-22-2018 01:52 AM
Carl Spackler
Major
208
11-29-2013 03:15 PM
MacMan
Cargo
1
03-19-2007 10:10 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
06-20-2005 12:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices