Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
787 Production problems >

787 Production problems

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

787 Production problems

Old 04-20-2019, 02:21 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,384
Default 787 Production problems

Article about poor manufacturing issues on the 787 in SC and the



Claims of Shoddy Production Draw Scrutiny to a Second Boeing Jet
Workers at a 787 Dreamliner plant in South Carolina have complained of defective manufacturing, debris left on planes and pressure to not report violations.

By Natalie Kitroeff and David Gelles

NORTH CHARLESTON, S.C. — When Boeing broke ground on its new factory near Charleston in 2009, the plant was trumpeted as a state-of-the-art manufacturing hub, building one of the most advanced aircraft in the world. But in the decade since, the factory, which makes the 787 Dreamliner, has been plagued by shoddy production and weak oversight that have threatened to compromise safety.

A New York Times review of hundreds of pages of internal emails, corporate documents and federal records, as well as interviews with more than a dozen current and former employees, reveals a culture that often valued production speed over quality. Facing long manufacturing delays, Boeing pushed its work force to quickly turn out Dreamliners, at times ignoring issues raised by employees.

Complaints about the frenzied pace echo broader concerns about the company in the wake of two deadly crashes involving another jet, the 737 Max. Boeing is now facing questions about whether the race to get the Max done, and catch up to its rival Airbus, led it to miss safety risks in the design, like an anti-stall system that played a role in both crashes.

Safety lapses at the North Charleston plant have drawn the scrutiny of airlines and regulators. Qatar Airways stopped accepting planes from the factory after manufacturing mishaps damaged jets and delayed deliveries. Workers have filed nearly a dozen whistle-blower claims and safety complaints with federal regulators, describing issues like defective manufacturing, debris left on planes and pressure to not report violations. Others have sued Boeing, saying they were retaliated against for flagging manufacturing mistakes.

Joseph Clayton, a technician at the North Charleston plant, one of two facilities where the Dreamliner is built, said he routinely found debris dangerously close to wiring beneath cockpits.

“I’ve told my wife that I never plan to fly on it,” he said. “It’s just a safety issue.”

In an industry where safety is paramount, the collective concerns involving two crucial Boeing planes — the company’s workhorse, the 737 Max, and another crown jewel, the 787 Dreamliner — point to potentially systemic problems. Regulators and lawmakers are taking a deeper look at Boeing’s priorities, and whether profits sometimes trumped safety. The leadership of Boeing, one of the country’s largest exporters, now finds itself in the unfamiliar position of having to defend its practices and motivations.

Boeing South Carolina teammates are producing the highest levels of quality in our history,” Kevin McAllister, Boeing’s head of commercial airplanes, said in a statement. “I am proud of our teams’ exceptional commitment to quality and stand behind the work they do each and every day.”

All factories deal with manufacturing errors, and there is no evidence that the problems in South Carolina have led to any major safety incidents. The Dreamliner has never crashed, although the fleet was briefly grounded after a battery fire. Airlines, too, have confidence in the Dreamliner.

But workers sometimes made dangerous mistakes, according to the current and former Boeing employees, some of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared retaliation.

Faulty parts have been installed in planes. Tools and metal shavings have routinely been left inside jets, often near electrical systems. Aircraft have taken test flights with debris in an engine and a tail, risking failure.

On several planes, John Barnett, a former quality manager who worked at Boeing for nearly three decades and retired in 2017, discovered clusters of metal slivers hanging over the wiring that commands the flight controls. If the sharp metal pieces — produced when fasteners were fitted into nuts — penetrate the wires, he said, it could be “catastrophic.”

So-called foreign object debris is a common issue in aviation. Employees are supposed to clean the bowels of the aircraft as they work, often with a vacuum, so they don’t accidentally contaminate the planes with shavings, tools, parts or other items.

But debris has remained a persistent problem in South Carolina. In an email this month, Brad Zaback, the head of the 787 program, reminded the North Charleston staff that stray objects left inside planes “can potentially have serious safety consequences when left unchecked.”

The issue has cost Boeing at other plants. In March, the Air Force halted deliveries of the KC-46 tanker, built in Everett, Wash., after finding a wrench, bolts and trash inside new planes.

“To say it bluntly, this is unacceptable,” Will Roper, an assistant secretary of the Air Force, told a congressional subcommittee in March. “Our flight lines are spotless. Our depots are spotless, because debris translates into a safety issue.”
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 04-20-2019, 07:24 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 201
Default

A hot bed of union organization.
AC560 is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 07:30 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cal73's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 853
Default

Originally Posted by AC560 View Post
A hot bed of union organization.


Those damn blue collar tweakers are beloved in this town.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cal73 is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 12:12 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Except doesn’t the South Carolina production plant not have a union. Thought that was why it was made.
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 02:39 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hindsight2020's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Center seat, doing loops to music
Posts: 821
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer View Post
Except doesn’t the South Carolina production plant not have a union. Thought that was why it was made.
He was being facetious, precisely to highlight what you point out.
hindsight2020 is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 05:30 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 201
Default

Originally Posted by hindsight2020 View Post
He was being facetious, precisely to highlight what you point out.
The issues in the article stem from the attempt to unionize, three tries I believe with a small toe hold. Certainly a lot of agenda both sides.
AC560 is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 08:50 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Default

No surprise at all. Welcome to corporate America.
stabapch is offline  
Old 04-22-2019, 10:43 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 201
Default

Originally Posted by stabapch View Post
No surprise at all. Welcome to corporate America.
Or these days just America, both sides to any issue are far to polarizing.
AC560 is offline  
Old 04-23-2019, 09:45 AM
  #9  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,549
Default

Related:

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas...=1000436137931
Flyby1206 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sata 4000 RP
Safety
1
02-12-2013 02:44 AM
shiznit
Safety
24
01-23-2013 06:43 PM
Bucking Bar
Major
97
03-21-2011 03:03 PM
aerospacepilot
Hangar Talk
22
12-19-2008 06:14 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-04-2005 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices