American, UPS, or Spirit
#51
#52
A lemming follows blindly, without thinking for themselves.
You looked at AMZN’s 10-K yet to see what segments are driving their revenue growth and expense growth, or are you content to repeat what you read in a Business Insider article?
Amazon *could* be the breaker of the duopoly in a way DHL wasn't...maybe. Well down the line. After billions and billions more CapEx to build a competitive air and ground network. Or, they could buy DHL USA and instantly be a player.
Who knows...but I still think pax carriers have more competitive risks though AA’s retirements can shorten the potential downside for a newhire in the next couple years. YMMV...
Last edited by BoilerUP; 09-24-2019 at 11:34 AM.
#53
Pan Am was not that big. Famous, yes. Big, no.
Any of the big three is probably about at least five times the size of Pan Am.
Now any of them could gradually dwindle away to the point of irrelevance but that would take many years. In the meantime they are too big to fail.
Any of the big three is probably about at least five times the size of Pan Am.
Now any of them could gradually dwindle away to the point of irrelevance but that would take many years. In the meantime they are too big to fail.
Pan Am was “the” United States international airline and essentially their flag carrier. It died. Ask anyone in the 1960s if they would envision air travel without Pan Am, wonder what they would say?
You can’t hedge your bets and say AA is too big to fail and then say it could fail if they have many years of bad decisions, it’s contradictory. If they make bad decisions, they will fail. Pan Am began making bad decisions, perhaps with the purchase of National, and over years of bad decisions, they failed.
No airlines are too big to fail. Sure, they can get relief from the government, like to auto makers have as well, but that doesn’t make them too big to fail.
#54
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 271
You’re right again, All the experts are wrong. No threat from anything, got it. If you go back a few pages I said the guy should go to UPS but lets not kid ourselves, UPS has the same big issue that AA has.....heavily unionized workforce. Amazon, or even new pax startups dont have that issue. You guys also have the self driving airplane problem you “might” have to contend with but we have the aelf driving car issue where everyone stops flying flights less than 500miles because they can let the robot drive but wait, you have the self driving truck issue. Its all a guess at this point and nobody really knows but if you dont believe amazon is coming to disrupt your business model then you might have your head in the sand. Will it take time? Yep but just like winter its coming and when it gets here dont be like damn, what just happened?
#55
Social Media retired.
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 777
Between boiler, myself, and a handful of others, we have put out a ton of information on all aspects of the UPS gig over the last few years on the UPS threads. Head over there and do the research. The big 5 are all quality spots, each having its pros and cons so you can’t really go wrong but some may be better than others depending on your needs/preferences. Also, FedEx/UPS aren’t really cargo - think scheduled express shippers/logistics/supply chain solutions, etc.
#56
The crux of the issue is the "experts" you mention, just like Jon Snow, know nothing. They are willfully ignorant and worship at the altar of Bezos as if Amazon is a juggernaut that will roll over all in its path regardless of industry.
Kinda reminds me of what people wrote about Wal-Mart 15 years ago...
I never said there are "no threats", I called the threats overblown. You're right 100% that there are threats to all segments and all employers (you'll find those risks in their 10-Ks...) and nobody is immune; as an employee you takes yous chances.
That's EXACTLY it; nail-on-the-head to the basic reality that the Amazon fanboiis spilling thousands of words in columns with clickbait headlines simply cannot or will not acknowledge - especially when the authors' knowledge of logistics is absolutely nil.
You might note I never said they "aren't coming", I said their threat was overblown - because it is. Amazon is to UPS what the ME3 and Flags of Convenience is to AA, a potential threat to future revenue growth but in no way/shape/form a tangible threat to employment security let alone the going concern.
Oh by the way, AWS is driving Amazon's growth these days...an industry that is (by comparison to transport and last mile delivery) not very capital intensive.
Kinda reminds me of what people wrote about Wal-Mart 15 years ago...
I never said there are "no threats", I called the threats overblown. You're right 100% that there are threats to all segments and all employers (you'll find those risks in their 10-Ks...) and nobody is immune; as an employee you takes yous chances.
Its all a guess at this point and nobody really knows
if you dont believe amazon is coming to disrupt your business model then you might have your head in the sand.
Oh by the way, AWS is driving Amazon's growth these days...an industry that is (by comparison to transport and last mile delivery) not very capital intensive.
#57
Social Media retired.
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 777
You’re right again, All the experts are wrong. No threat from anything, got it. If you go back a few pages I said the guy should go to UPS but lets not kid ourselves, UPS has the same big issue that AA has.....heavily unionized workforce. Amazon, or even new pax startups dont have that issue. You guys also have the self driving airplane problem you “might” have to contend with but we have the aelf driving car issue where everyone stops flying flights less than 500miles because they can let the robot drive but wait, you have the self driving truck issue. Its all a guess at this point and nobody really knows but if you dont believe amazon is coming to disrupt your business model then you might have your head in the sand. Will it take time? Yep but just like winter its coming and when it gets here dont be like damn, what just happened?
Also, once they replace cargo pilots with single pilot or pilotless planes, the pax carriers are next in line...
#58
Does anyone here vote for him to stay at spirit? I mean we act like there isn’t a recession looming (when or how large is impossible to tell) but isn’t spirit in a pretty solid place if that happens?
Honest question, not looking to flame but trying to gain context- what happened in the ‘08-10 time period with regards to UPS/FedEx? Did they grow? Stagnate?
Honest question, not looking to flame but trying to gain context- what happened in the ‘08-10 time period with regards to UPS/FedEx? Did they grow? Stagnate?
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
I don’t think it’s comparable to use size of the airline as to the impact the airline had. Nobody doubts American Airlines is much larger than Pan Am was, but more people travel now than they did in the 60s, so it’s not apples and apples.
Pan Am was “the” United States international airline and essentially their flag carrier. It died. Ask anyone in the 1960s if they would envision air travel without Pan Am, wonder what they would say?
You can’t hedge your bets and say AA is too big to fail and then say it could fail if they have many years of bad decisions, it’s contradictory. If they make bad decisions, they will fail. Pan Am began making bad decisions, perhaps with the purchase of National, and over years of bad decisions, they failed.
No airlines are too big to fail. Sure, they can get relief from the government, like to auto makers have as well, but that doesn’t make them too big to fail.
Pan Am was “the” United States international airline and essentially their flag carrier. It died. Ask anyone in the 1960s if they would envision air travel without Pan Am, wonder what they would say?
You can’t hedge your bets and say AA is too big to fail and then say it could fail if they have many years of bad decisions, it’s contradictory. If they make bad decisions, they will fail. Pan Am began making bad decisions, perhaps with the purchase of National, and over years of bad decisions, they failed.
No airlines are too big to fail. Sure, they can get relief from the government, like to auto makers have as well, but that doesn’t make them too big to fail.
Ultimately, the CAB's reluctance during the regulated era to grant Pan Am any domestic routes is what killed them after deregulation.
Last edited by 450knotOffice; 09-24-2019 at 03:03 PM.
#60
Social Media retired.
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 777
There’s inherent risk in any job that involves piloting aircraft. We can predict the weather better than we can predict which airlines are going to survive and which will fail. We suck at predicting the weather...choosing an airline shouldn’t be based on a wild guess of who might be the last man standing. The OP wanted to know basic questions about Brown - we’ve put so much info out on the UPS threads: pay, schedules, vacation, benefits, retirement, contract summaries, etc., that anyone who has spent even a little time researching over there should have a pretty good idea of what the gig is like.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post