End of 2019 salary survey
#611
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
End of 2019 salary survey
I’m glad that you are happy with your A plan. While it may not seem like it, there is definitely a specific rate of return tied to a pension. The same way that when you lease a car you are paying a specific interest amount on the money. The only difference between a lease and a traditional car loan is the dealership does not have to tell you what percentage rate that is with a lease. In both cases (a pension and a lease), you have to back into it yourself with some complicated math formulas. The bottom line is that his response about pensions returning 5 to 6% is pretty accurate.
If you want to compare apples to apples, look at how much monthly is put into your A plan. You can put it into a financial calculator that you find on Google and assume a 10% return with monthly additions over the length of your career. You will find quite a large sum at the end of your career. Take that large sum and multiply it by 10%. I bet that number will be more than the monthly payment that you will receive from your pension. On top of that, when you die that lump sum can be given to your heirs.
If you want to compare apples to apples, look at how much monthly is put into your A plan. You can put it into a financial calculator that you find on Google and assume a 10% return with monthly additions over the length of your career. You will find quite a large sum at the end of your career. Take that large sum and multiply it by 10%. I bet that number will be more than the monthly payment that you will receive from your pension. On top of that, when you die that lump sum can be given to your heirs.
I do know how pensions work. And state and federal pensions work very similarly to private pensions, in that a portion of compensation is paid into a pension fund which gets invested and managed by the company, and in the end is treated effectively like a long-term annuity, where the amount initially invested in the pension fund theoretically can't be touched and you never get that nest egg back when you die. The diff between a company and govt pension is that govt pensions are at risk of being borrowed from, at the stroke of a pen by the legislature and governor, while corporate pensions are somewhat more rigorously regulated yet still at risk to cover company liabilities. A govt can also budget more to cover pension payouts if they fail to contribute enough into the pension fund, while a company that under-contributes to its pension fund ends up having to cash-flow the difference and might end up defaulting on the whole thing if they end up with too much pension liabilities and not enough pension fund investments.
Also, I was specifically talking about an "A/B strategy" for managing your own retirement assets. Nothing to do with A and B "plan" retirements. A/B fund strategies with regards to your own investments refers to having separate conservative and aggressive funds within your own retirement accounts, and is a way to maximize returns over the long term while managing risk over an approx 5-year rolling period. A properly followed A/B fund strategy can maintain market average returns essentially indefinitely without risking losing everything or even having to cut withdrawal rate in a market downturn lasting several years. My point in bringing this up is that almost every pension on the planet returns ballpark 5%, no better than an annuity that you can purchase, because of how they're run. If you properly invest the amount contributed to the pension in your name instead (ie. take the buy-out if that's an option and invest it yourself), you should be able to see returns closer to 8-10% over almost any timeframe. The trick is to have an "A fund" containing 5 years of household expenses invested conservatively, and the remainder in the "B fund" invested as aggressively as desired. In the history of the stock market, there have been very few 5-year periods where the market has not turned a profit, and over the history of the market it has returned an average approx 10-11%. So a 5 year "A fund" should cover almost any conceivable market downturn, you live off the A fund when the market is bad, and you refill your A fund from the aggressively invested B fund when the market is good. It works, and it returns about double what you see from a typical company run pension. You can easily calculate return your company's pension is expected to return by taking the buyout amount, and figuring the rate of return it would have to have in order to pay out the expected pension payout for life. Generally you'll see that it's ballpark 5%.
Money works the same regardless of your industry and history has shown that ALL pensions can be at risk. An unhealthy pension fund can go bankrupt, and a healthy pension fund can get raided to cover other liabilities in the event of bankruptcy. That's the same no matter where you are.
Also, I was specifically talking about an "A/B strategy" for managing your own retirement assets. Nothing to do with A and B "plan" retirements. A/B fund strategies with regards to your own investments refers to having separate conservative and aggressive funds within your own retirement accounts, and is a way to maximize returns over the long term while managing risk over an approx 5-year rolling period. A properly followed A/B fund strategy can maintain market average returns essentially indefinitely without risking losing everything or even having to cut withdrawal rate in a market downturn lasting several years. My point in bringing this up is that almost every pension on the planet returns ballpark 5%, no better than an annuity that you can purchase, because of how they're run. If you properly invest the amount contributed to the pension in your name instead (ie. take the buy-out if that's an option and invest it yourself), you should be able to see returns closer to 8-10% over almost any timeframe. The trick is to have an "A fund" containing 5 years of household expenses invested conservatively, and the remainder in the "B fund" invested as aggressively as desired. In the history of the stock market, there have been very few 5-year periods where the market has not turned a profit, and over the history of the market it has returned an average approx 10-11%. So a 5 year "A fund" should cover almost any conceivable market downturn, you live off the A fund when the market is bad, and you refill your A fund from the aggressively invested B fund when the market is good. It works, and it returns about double what you see from a typical company run pension. You can easily calculate return your company's pension is expected to return by taking the buyout amount, and figuring the rate of return it would have to have in order to pay out the expected pension payout for life. Generally you'll see that it's ballpark 5%.
Money works the same regardless of your industry and history has shown that ALL pensions can be at risk. An unhealthy pension fund can go bankrupt, and a healthy pension fund can get raided to cover other liabilities in the event of bankruptcy. That's the same no matter where you are.
I’m not sure I explained it well enough. Let me put it this way. It doesn’t matter how much FDX/UPS funds their pension obligation or their assumed rate of return on that. The simple formula (YOS x % x high 5) dictates the monthly benefit, regardless of funding and rate of return, no assumptions needed. Also, there are now laws on funding obligations and required insurance premiums to the PBGC.
There are pros and cons to A plans and B plans. I was just trying to dispel the idea that an A plan can go completely away, to zero. There is a floor to any A plan that you can count on, more so than a B plan. If the economy goes down to the point that FDX/UPS goes bankrupt and a judge allows the divestiture of the pensions, the PBGC will still pay some of it. But if the economy is that bad, how much will the B plan lose? Having both an A and B plan is, as FDX/UPS have, is just another form of diversification.
#612
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
End of 2019 salary survey
A pension doesn’t go completely away. If it’s divested to the PBGC, that $130k/yr would go down to about $70k/yr.
Sorry I can’t answer that math question. Someone smarter than me can probably do it. But it should take into account that no one will completely lose their pension. Maybe calculating it only for the amount one would lose, in this case 130-70=$60k/yr?
#613
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Can someone just take all the relevant information on this thread and just create a spreadsheet and post it? Thanks
Or maybe there is a way to create a spreadsheet (template) that people can crowd source?
#614
You know many people IN RETIREMENT who have all their savings in a SP500 index fund?
That’s very a aggressive and risky investment strategy for a retiree...
#615
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 617
That’s my plan. It’s risky NOT to be invested well enough to keep up with/ahead of inflation. I plan to have about a year or 2 worth of expenses in cash in case of a major market downturn. I want to die with the same amount (or more) in my nest egg as the day I retire. That will be nice to leave to my kids/grandkids. I’m not planning in living a meager retirement either. If you save enough it can be done.
#616
Making a 3% return on a safe investment would only keep you even, not move you forward like it may seem.
#617
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,094
A pension doesn’t go completely away. If it’s divested to the PBGC, that $130k/yr would go down to about $70k/yr.
Sorry I can’t answer that math question. Someone smarter than me can probably do it. But it should take into account that no one will completely lose their pension. Maybe calculating it only for the amount one would lose, in this case 130-70=$60k/yr?
Sorry I can’t answer that math question. Someone smarter than me can probably do it. But it should take into account that no one will completely lose their pension. Maybe calculating it only for the amount one would lose, in this case 130-70=$60k/yr?
https://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-x...273-story.html
So I guess you would have to save enough to pay $85,000 a year to make up the difference.
Some sad stories in that article about companies (and unions) negotiating away the pensions from retirees.
#618
A decade and a half old, to be exact...just a couple things have changed in the airline industry and financial world since then.
Here's the current PBGC benefit chart:
https://www.pbgc.gov/wr/benefits/gua...imum-guarantee
Here's the current PBGC benefit chart:
https://www.pbgc.gov/wr/benefits/gua...imum-guarantee
#619
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,094
A decade and a half old, to be exact...just a couple things have changed in the airline industry and financial world since then.
Here's the current PBGC benefit chart:
https://www.pbgc.gov/wr/benefits/gua...imum-guarantee
Here's the current PBGC benefit chart:
https://www.pbgc.gov/wr/benefits/gua...imum-guarantee
Now they only have to replace $60,000.
Did they fix this part?
“The lawsuit stems from Delta’s 2005 bankruptcy filing and subsequent transfer of pension liability to the PBGC. The agency botched its takeover of their pensions by defying the benefit priorities established by statute in an effort to keep money in its coffers and maximize its investment returns, the pilots said.
The PBGC allegedly blocked objections to this move by withholding information and denying them the opportunity to lodge an “informed appeal,” the pilots said.”
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/employ...ederal-insurer
#620
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,735
You can do what you want, I’m just going by the last 10+ year history which gives a 10-13% ROR, if you want to play it safe and put it in bonds and get a ROR that barely keeps up with inflation that’s fine too.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post