Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Good Riddance (ESAs to be Banned) >

Good Riddance (ESAs to be Banned)

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Good Riddance (ESAs to be Banned)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2020, 07:47 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 144
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
This is how weak society has become, people need “emotional support” animals because they are too immature or uneducated to handle the stresses of life. This is what happens when you give everyone participation trophies and tell them they are all equal in outcome. I love my dog more than the next person but if you need an emotional support animal on a flight, you need some serious mental help.
Do you really believe that all these people are bringing their animals into the cabin because they need emotional support? I've been present several times when crew were try to bring animals through KCM and they had the nerve to get upset when they were denied. Ninety percent of the idiots trying to bring their animals on-board think that that their animals are special and shouldn't be relegated to the cargo hold with the animals of people who weren't wealthy and/or cynical enough to flout the rules.

Either way, good riddance to them.
Back2future is offline  
Old 01-23-2020, 08:02 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
drywhitetoast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: Sitting
Posts: 498
Default

Wonder how many of them bring them into a job interview?
drywhitetoast is online now  
Old 01-23-2020, 09:07 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,228
Default

The young women with the big unruly “support” dogs that defecate all over because they are freaked out and stressed have brought this on, it needs to end.
trip is offline  
Old 01-23-2020, 10:35 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Omniscient's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 813
Default

Originally Posted by morerightrudder View Post
Most people who bring ESAs don't really need them. It's just a convenient excuse to bring your pet for free. Glad the FAA and airlines are trying to crack down.
Haha, uh yeah, that’s the entire point of why pilots are glad it’s coming to an end.
Omniscient is offline  
Old 01-23-2020, 12:10 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Karnak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Default

Wonder if the increase in ESA dogs/cats would've happened if we hadn't killed so many animals in our cargo holds?

There were some horrific instances of passenger's dear pets getting snuffed in airliners due to various levels of ramper/planner/pilot incompetence.
Karnak is offline  
Old 01-23-2020, 12:44 PM
  #16  
Prime Minister/Moderator
Thread Starter
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,224
Default

Originally Posted by SparrowBird View Post
How long before a lawsuit?
Harder to sue the government and win. Not impossible but hard.

If you don't like a reg, have to prove it's illegal.

Don't like a law, have to prove it's unconstitutional.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-23-2020, 03:36 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
I went pretty far into this before, ESAs ARE considered service animals, although they have a few different requirements and the airlines have a little more power with them, they are included in the law as a subset of service animals. It's always referred to as ESA/PSA in the law. That's one of the big hangups currently, and yes, they are also supposed to be trained. The airlines can request records of their training to be sure they won't pose a threat to other people in the cabin, but the airlines tend to not train their people and enforce these rules much, passing it off to the cabin crew.

Go into the previous Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Final Rule comments on the current transportation service animal law, this is where the above information comes from.

ESAs are only grouped in with "service animals" on airplanes. They are not service animals under the ADA or any other federal law, they were just allowed during the ACA, so no they are not "service animals." Although, this is why people started to think they could bring their ESAs into supermarkets and other areas where pets are banned but service animals have to be permitted.
Baradium is offline  
Old 01-23-2020, 08:27 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,978
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
ESAs are only grouped in with "service animals" on airplanes. They are not service animals under the ADA or any other federal law, they were just allowed during the ACA, so no they are not "service animals." Although, this is why people started to think they could bring their ESAs into supermarkets and other areas where pets are banned but service animals have to be permitted.
It appears so.
DOT docket OST-2004-19482 states that emotional support/psychiatric support service animals are considered to be a category of service animals in the Guidance Concerning Service Animals section after the Appendices, page 46 within the document, under the heading “Service Animals”:

Also, an animal used for emotional support need not have specific training for that function. Similar to an animal that has been individually trained, the definition of a service animal includes: An animal that has been shown to have the innate ability to assist a person with a disability; or an emotional support animal.

The DOT document was evidently based on 1996 guidance from the ADA. If you want the full story, look up OST-2004-19482 and go from there.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 01-24-2020, 05:38 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sluggo_63's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,273
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
ESAs are only grouped in with "service animals" on airplanes. They are not service animals under the ADA or any other federal law, they were just allowed during the ACA, so no they are not "service animals." Although, this is why people started to think they could bring their ESAs into supermarkets and other areas where pets are banned but service animals have to be permitted.
ESAs are also required to be accommodated in some housing where pets aren't allowed.
Sluggo_63 is offline  
Old 01-25-2020, 07:52 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TangoIndiaMike1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Captain for Skyhawks
Posts: 482
Default

At some point size does matter. If something happens and a mini horse that’s not strapped in Wacks the seat in front of it due to a ditching. Is the seat rated for that? Hopefully everyone can step over the horse but good luck to grandma and her walker during the evac.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TangoIndiaMike1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flysooner9
Hangar Talk
2
09-14-2011 07:37 PM
jungle
Money Talk
1
04-21-2011 09:56 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
10
01-15-2007 08:59 PM
CALPilotToo
Cargo
25
11-26-2006 10:15 AM
captain_drew
Major
30
06-29-2006 02:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices