US Airlines’ Request $50 Billion Bailout
#161
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 98
think the management was bad now? Wait until all the smart guys in mgmt go to chase greener($$) pastures. People don’t get into airlines because they like conservative well-run businesses. Airlines are high-risk, high-reward affairs and it’s leaders are ego-driven adrenaline junkies, not your Warren Buffet types. This is a perfect example of systemic risk. They knew it could happen at any time, they rode the knife, and got their reward as soon as the opportunity arose. And the labor force has been taking its payday as well; called “growth”, enjoying strong contracts, better work rules, and generous profit sharing. It’s no surprise all the contract renegotiations had stalled. Everyone had been waiting for a recession to raise its head. Just didn’t quite expect the double whammy. You can’t punish the people that you’re paying to play the game, for playing the game.
#162
So lots of people recognize that the airline industry is a vital part of our economy and national security, so therefore is worth bailing out. Lots of other industries can make similar cases. Where do we draw the line? Once we determine and industry is too big to fail, then we are admitting that the federal government will always step in to save it. That means management never has to pay any consequences for risky actions. Bailing out all the vital industries every 10-20 years is pretty inefficient. At some point they should just be run as utilities which would be an end of capitalism for our largest industries.
https://mises.org/library/what-causes-moral-hazard
#163
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 80
Very thankful to the Democrats who included the payroll grants and worker protections. McConnell's bill sure didn't have that. It was purely a $500b slush fund that the White House had the freedom to give to whoever they wanted with no oversight, and no requirement to release who got what for 6 months. Just. Wow.
Pelosi's bill had a requirement for a union member to be a part of the corporate board. It had restrictions on stock buybacks.
Don't forget who backed us months from now.
https://www.bizjournals.com/charlott...s-bailout.html
Pelosi's bill had a requirement for a union member to be a part of the corporate board. It had restrictions on stock buybacks.
Don't forget who backed us months from now.
https://www.bizjournals.com/charlott...s-bailout.html
#164
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 659
Very thankful to the Democrats who included the payroll grants and worker protections. McConnell's bill sure didn't have that. It was purely a $500b slush fund that the White House had the freedom to give to whoever they wanted with no oversight, and no requirement to release who got what for 6 months. Just. Wow.
Pelosi's bill had a requirement for a union member to be a part of the corporate board. It had restrictions on stock buybacks.
Don't forget who backed us months from now.
https://www.bizjournals.com/charlott...s-bailout.html
Pelosi's bill had a requirement for a union member to be a part of the corporate board. It had restrictions on stock buybacks.
Don't forget who backed us months from now.
https://www.bizjournals.com/charlott...s-bailout.html
#165
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 79
I'm sorry, but if you think CEOs will play nice without having the rules explicitly spelled out for them in legislation, then you're naive. McConnell and the republicans want to give a blank check to the executives so they can escape with their golden parachutes after the company gets gutted. Pelosi's bill had a requirement for a union member to be a part of the corporate board, and restrictions on stock buybacks which is part of the reason things are so dire. Republicans are playing the partisan game here, and dont like being called out for their crony capitalism. I want a bailout too, but I do not want a blank check handed to execs, even though they "pledged" to be good boys. Legislate that; it's what congress is supposed to do.
#167
#168
Bailout - Deal has been agreed upon. We will see what amount and layout is soon. @3AM / 25 Mar.
Unfortunately they finally are talking virus spike. Many of us have been saying this all along. “Spike is coming” logical assessment as other countries spiked, it’s not like we wouldn’t with the basic measures/society mentality we have shown. Some did well, others going full tilt.
Unfortunately they finally are talking virus spike. Many of us have been saying this all along. “Spike is coming” logical assessment as other countries spiked, it’s not like we wouldn’t with the basic measures/society mentality we have shown. Some did well, others going full tilt.
#170
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 627
Lack of Law in the FAA
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post