Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Rip off the bandaid now or slowly bleed out? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/128661-rip-off-bandaid-now-slowly-bleed-out.html)

rickair7777 03-30-2020 07:34 AM


Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER (Post 3017045)
Where are you getting this nonsense from? :rolleyes:

No this is a real concern. If your employer doesn't need cash NOW, they might take a longer-term view.

iPilot 03-30-2020 07:35 AM


Originally Posted by JulesWinfield (Post 3017032)
I'm not taking a position either way, but it does seem foolish to spend 25 billion to just delay the inevitable. We're all flying around empty airplanes and losing money on every flight. At some point, we need to realize that it isn't sustainable, right?

I think the 4 months is to stabilize them through this ridiculously slow time for the industry. They probably would not of been able to make it out the other side of this virus lockdown otherwise. The real question is what is the travel industry going to look like in October? I'm betting that's where the fleet/manpower planning folks are earning their keep right now. They'll come up with their best plan of action and then make their recommendations to the execs. My guess is the rest of the 4 months will be gearing up for that day through displacement bids and training while everything is shut down. That way October 1st they'll be ready to go with whatever the long term plan is.

To add: airlines with simple fleet plans have a much easier task ahead. Frontier, Spirit, Southwest and even JetBlue or Alaska might decide its just easier to not take the money and go their own way. That money is coming with some onerous terms for management and just like Ford in 2008 decide its just easier if they don't strap themselves to Uncle Sam.

WHACKMASTER 03-30-2020 07:46 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3017065)
No this is a real concern. If your employer doesn't need cash NOW, they might take a longer-term view.

Now I’m no SWA cheerleader (and that’s a gross understatement), but I’d be shocked if they went for furloughs instead of the grants. It would utterly destroy employee moral and what the Kompany has stood for.

Again, not impossible but personally I can’t wrap my mind around furloughs over grant money. Now furloughs after September......definitely a good possibility.

rickair7777 03-30-2020 07:51 AM


Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER (Post 3017081)
Now I’m no SWA cheerleader (and that’s a gross understatement), but I’d be shocked if they went for furloughs instead of the grants. It would utterly destroy employee moral and what the Kompany has stood for.

Again, not impossible but personally I can’t wrap my mind around furloughs over grant money. Now furloughs after September......definitely a good possibility.

I agree they really don't want to go there, but what if furloughs leaves them $2B in cash on 01 Oct and grants + no furloughs leave them $0.8B?

I think it comes down to how much of the pie each carrier will be allocated. Don't know if that will be based on a fixed metric like ASM's, or if it will be need based. If it's the later I suspect some furloughs might happen at non-big-three majors.

Peacock 03-30-2020 07:57 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3017087)
I agree they really don't want to go there, but what if furloughs leaves them $2B in cash on 01 Oct and grants + no furloughs leave them $0.8B?

I think it comes down to how much of the pie each carrier will be allocated. Don't know if that will be based on a fixed metric like ASM's, or if it will be need based. If it's the later I suspect some furloughs might happen at non-big-three majors.

The grants are the payroll from the same period last year

rickair7777 03-30-2020 08:16 AM


Originally Posted by Peacock (Post 3017094)
The grants are the payroll from the same period last year

Is that in the law, or policy from Treasury? Also know if that includes the cost of bennies?

Flubber 03-30-2020 08:41 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3017128)
Is that in the law, or policy from Treasury? Also know if that includes the cost of bennies?

It's in the language: salary and benefits, based on the amounts paid to employees 4/1/2019 thru 9/30/2019.

rickair7777 03-30-2020 08:57 AM


Originally Posted by Flubber (Post 3017170)
It's in the language: salary and benefits, based on the amounts paid to employees 4/1/2019 thru 9/30/2019.

OK, I didn't look hard enough. If that's what it is then everybody should take the grant unless they have some weird circumstance.

SAABoroowski 03-30-2020 08:58 AM


Originally Posted by Peacock (Post 3017094)
The grants are the payroll from the same period last year

too bad my airline grew significantly since then and our payroll costs are much higher

stevo22 03-30-2020 09:05 AM


Originally Posted by SAABoroowski (Post 3017188)
too bad my airline grew significantly since then and our payroll costs are much higher

At least the lack of open time and premiums as well as overtime in other positions will be way lower or nonexistent this year and reduced lines will stretch it a bit further for pretty much all carriers. Even with growth I think payroll costs could be lower.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands